Was Jesus God?
December 4th, 2015 at 12:15:22 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
This whole conversation is such a joke. The Church is filled with Gay men, even the new pope says so. If anybody thinks all those Gay men are celibate, they're nuts. The Church has a huge history of abusing kids. With all this going on, they still think they have the moral authority to stand and point the finger at others. Hypocrisy is too nice a word for it. If I said what it really is, I'd get suspended for 3 days. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 4th, 2015 at 12:21:09 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Did you see where it was two of Yahweh's followers who are responsible for the massacre in Calif? Three, actually, if you include the Jewish guy that set off the Muslim on a rampage. That's deluded, that's crazy. Good ol Yahweh, his thousands of years of mayhem rolls on. Don't try and paint the rest of us with your broad brush. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 4th, 2015 at 12:44:47 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I kind of think you should be suspended for this. It is like the trifecta of insults to homosexuals. First you say that if they don't actually have gay sex then their attraction is not real. Then you stereotype gay people by how they act, dress, and what they do. Now you infer that it is gay people who are the ones who are abusing children, equating homosexuality with pedophilia. I'll say what I think you are - a prejudiced bigot towards Catholics, Christians, and gay people. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 4th, 2015 at 12:45:56 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I know you don't like details but their specific understanding of YHWY is of the Islamic tradition. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 4th, 2015 at 1:59:03 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Right on the first two, wrong on the third. I have known a lot of Gay men over the years and liked just about all of them. I make no bones about saying that organized religion is what's the problem in this world, not the solution. Look what Yahweh did on Wed in Calif, he never quits. There was a Gay priest who came out last month and was immediately kicked out of the priesthood because he was in a relationship with another man. He said the priesthood is rife with non celibate Gay priests. Is he lying? The rest of what you spewed is nonsense, not worth replying to. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 4th, 2015 at 2:01:26 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Yahweh is the same god for all 3 Abrahamic religions, the details don't interest me. He's the one they pray to, he's the one you pray to. There's no difference to us seeing the result of the prayer. The OT violence lives on. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 4th, 2015 at 3:08:44 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Me too.
This is like saying guns are the real problem.
Absolutely.
Let me translate this: "I have no response and have been shown to be wrong so rather than just admit it I will be mean and refuse to reply." “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 4th, 2015 at 3:33:33 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
It's a shame they chose prejudice over doing their good work. What do you suppose is far more harmful for an orphan? Having same sex parents, or having no parents at all? Given the choice, they chose, no doubt out of love, to throw the orphans under the bus. Funny how in the early days of the church, the faithful made it a point to loudly claim they cared for children abandoned by their parents outside the city walls, especially in large cities like Rome. I wonder, was it legitimate charity or mere propaganda to gain acceptance? Maybe it was a lie. Someone here claims the church hasn't changed in 2,000 years...
Oh, yes it does. And I'm proud of it. I just don't think such rejection counts as love.
This is the first time I've ever heard a Christian tell an atheist "you're going to" and not end the phrase with "Hell." Fortunately for me there is no Hell. More fortunately, from what little I've read about it, there is no Heaven, either.
1) there is more, a lot more, to sex than "genital activity." 2) Natural law shows us that a limb, organ, function, substance, attribute, etc. developed for one purpose is often used and/or develops additional functions. Sex evolved for procreation, in microscopic plants and animals millions of years ago. it hasn't got stuck there, you know. Particularly in species which are sexually active year-round and have no means of signaling or even sensing fertility, reproduction is, by time and use, a secondary function of sex. In humans it serves for bonding much more than it does for procreation. 3) Read point 2). It's natural to bond with one's spouse through sex. Now, can you tell me again how all true love is good, but straight cisgender love is gooder(*) than other forms of monogamous relationships? (*) used on purpose. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 4th, 2015 at 4:13:50 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
I have no response because it's ridiculous. And now priests are lying? 50%-60% of priests are Gay, some say it's higher. Why? Are Gay men really that much more religious than straight men? Or is it because they know in every all male group, the chance of finding a kindred spirit will be quite high. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 4th, 2015 at 5:51:02 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
How in the world is this prejudice, unless you are talking about prejudice against the Catholic Church? Is it not reasonable to desire to place a child with a mother and father rather than two mothers or tow fathers? There are plenty of husbands and wives who can't have kids and want to adopt I don't see how it is prejudice to have a preference for them. Remember it is not that they don't want to, it is that they cannot without federal funds withheld.
That was abortion back in the day and today the Church continues its 2000 year consistent teaching that even a developing human being in the womb has rights and should be protected. So it certainly wasn't a lie or propaganda it is what the Church continues to do today.
The Church does not and you are not rejected and this does count as love. Don't confuse challenge, compassion, or concern with rejection.
Maybe you should define sex then.
Sexual activity serves both important functions of bonding and procreation. You cannot separate those two aspect of sexual activity they are meant to go together. There are many, many ways to bond with another person, some of which are more important and meaningful than sex. As you have said there is more to it than "genital activity".
It is indeed very natural if one's spouse is the opposite sex.
I don't think the true love of monogamous straight couples and the monogamous homosexual couples love is gooder, but it is different. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |