Spoiler commetns on "The Shawshank Redemption."
February 1st, 2015 at 3:52:03 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
A lot of them are dumb guys who failed the cop tests. So they do this because they get a uniform and authority, which is what they really want. Some of them even get to carry guns. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
February 1st, 2015 at 4:46:42 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18204 |
Once one really talked like a total jerk to me. I wrote a letter to the warden. I know nothing came of it, but boy was I po'ed he acted like he did. Dude talked to me like I was a guest of New York. He might be a captain by now. In free society dealing with the public based on his people skills I would not have given him a mop job. The President is a fink. |
February 2nd, 2015 at 12:04:13 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
Narration is not always intended by the director, and in some cases they are forced to add a narrator because some executives feel it isn't comprehensible. Blade Runner is probably the best known film where the narration was added by request of executives (and against the wishes of the director). One of my favorite narrations begins as follows. Can you identify the movie?
|
February 2nd, 2015 at 12:23:06 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Fight Club, which I found to be very disappointing. Not what I expected at all. I don't like movies where they lead you to believe one thing is going on, when in reality the main character is just a whack job. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
February 3rd, 2015 at 6:55:32 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Overvalued movie... You know what could have used narration, or even plain dialogue? 2001. What the hell happens after Bowman steps off the ship the last time is pure gibberish. Yes, I've read the book (overvalued novel) and the sequels (one decent one). Clarke was at his best with short stories anyway. Books have a density of information that's hard to translate to the screen intact, or in some cases even in a comprehensible form. One notable exception is the Italian movie "Noi Vivi." They had no real script, so they pretty much shot the entire book scene by scene as far as the budget allowed. Of course some movies don't even care what the book is about. That's how you get an abortion like "The Bicentennial Man," which bears only a very slight, very distant resemblance to Asimov's masterpiece. That said, I would love to do a movie adaptation of "The End of Eternity." It would require narration, additional characters (there are four real characters in the entire novel: Andrew, Noys, Twisell and Finge) for exposition, and date headings for each scene (ie "Date: 11,509 AD. Physiotime 625." and near the end "Date 1925 AD Physiotime 626"). It would be quite a chore. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |