Very sad story
September 7th, 2015 at 1:40:15 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | This is the best story of the translations I've read. Instead of Wycliffe changing the NT to read the way he wanted it to, as the Church accused him of, "the first edition was slavishly literal—even to the point of retaining the Latin word order when it made no sense in English!" He did a word for word translation from the Latin, nobody in his time understood the Greek anymore. Then along comes Tyndale 30 years later and produces the masterpiece from the Greek and Hebrew. His translation "heavily influenced the KJV: In 1940, Prof. J. Isaacs wrote of Tyndale’s accomplishment: “His simple directness, his magical simplicity of phrase, his modest music, have given an authority to his wording that has imposed itself on all later versions.… Nine-tenths of the Authorized New Testament is still Tindale, and the best is still his.” Tyndale's translation, that was supposedly chock full of so much heresy that the Vatican had him burned at the stake: "He was kidnapped in 1535 in Antwerp, and burned at the stake the next year for heresy. His charge? A corrupt translation of the Bible. The reality? A superb translation of the Bible." 90% of his work was used almost word for word in the Bible still used today, the King James Version. None of this is in dispute, there are originals of Wycliffe's and Tyndale's Bibles still around. https://bible.org/seriespage/1-wycliffe-king-james-period-challenge If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 7th, 2015 at 2:10:42 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | I think we are reading from different and biased histories here Evenbob. Some reality check might be in order. King Henry VIII condemned repeatedly the Tyndale translation; therefore I find it hard to believe that 90% of this poor translation found itself into a work that originally Henry VIII commissioned. You also have to remember that along with a translation of the Bible come prefaces, introductions, and notes. These too can be heretical and misleading no matter how literal you may attempt to make your translation. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
September 7th, 2015 at 2:15:23 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | Just found out why Henry VIII didn't like Tyndale or his translations that much. Apparently, Tyndale was against the king's famous divorce. That might explain away the King's condemnation of his translation and pretty much neuter my above post. Sorry about that. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
September 7th, 2015 at 2:43:31 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
It doesn't matter. We have original Tyndale Bibles, we know exactly what they say. It's the gold standard for translations of it's day. The Church, no matter what they've told you, only had an ironclad hand on the people as long as they completely controlled the written word. Once the truth got out, that the Church had mislead people about what the Bible contained, their worst nightmare came true, the Reformation. Did you read any of the long article I linked to on Sat, that said how scarce the Bible was in the world in the Middle Ages? The Vatican could have been cranking out hundreds of copies of the NT a year for hundreds of years, yet they did not. Most Churches had no written word at all, the priests had passages memorized that were chosen for them. They had no access to a the whole NT. In fact, if a priest was caught with a written NT, he was dealt with very harshly. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 8th, 2015 at 9:39:41 AM permalink | |
pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | Where in the Bible does it say that if a person commits suicide he or she goes to hell? |
September 8th, 2015 at 10:15:47 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
No the gold standard was the Vulgate.
This is pure poppycock and propaganda. The Church was not misleading anyone. Look we still have the same teachings and now everyone is much more literate and the Bible is much more available. If the Church was misleading anyone about what is in Scripture then those false teachings would have been changed based on Biblical research. Biblical research and education and literacy that the Church founded Europe's first universities for. The Church's best daydream is reformation. The Church like all institutions should be in a constant state of reformation. There were serious problems that needed to be addressed. Martin Luther helped the Church to address and correct these problems. It was pride and the sin of men, many in the Church and in the governments of nations at the time that led to the unfortunate split of Christianity.
yes.
They created many Bibles and did so as devotion and as works of art. There was not a huge demand for Bibles as the populace could barely read.
This is just simply not true. There were translations in English and many other languages approved and faithfully done that were encouraged to have - if you had the money. Books were not cheap. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
September 8th, 2015 at 10:57:35 AM permalink | |
Face Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 61 Posts: 3941 |
It doesn't say that, but much of the Bible says nothing. It's sort of up to you to figure it out, or so I've been told. It doesn't take much to find what I mean...
Your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost. Your body is God's body. To kill your body is to kill God's body. That is murder, in violation of the Sixth Commandment. Be bold and risk defeat, or be cautious and encourage it. |
September 8th, 2015 at 11:25:14 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
There are few items in the Western canon as repulsive as this one. If your body is god's and your spirit is god's, why the hell did he bother making you in the first place? I wouldn't treat a dog that way. No wonder reading the Bible is the surest way to propagate atheism. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
September 8th, 2015 at 12:06:34 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
After Wycliffe, not before. Wycliffe was a well educated priest at Oxford, he was appalled at how uninformed the common priest was about the scriptures. He set about translating the NT into English for the benefit of his church, and the Vatican came unglued. He didn't make a faulty translation as you claimed earlier, he didn't make one changing things to his way of thinking. He made a word for word translation from the Latin, we have Wycliffe Bibles that prove it. The truth, which you will never admit, is the Church was dead set against the whole Bible falling into the hands of the people, to the point they burned translators at the stake and even dug up their bones decades later and burned them. The Church was a censor, not an educator. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 8th, 2015 at 1:27:51 PM permalink | |
pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | That's cor 6-19-20. Paul is addressing born again believers in those passages. The unregenerate are not temples of the Holy Spirit and are going to hell anyway so the argument would be whether a Christian would be condemned to hell because he or she committed suicide. The bible says no. |