Hey FrGamble!
June 20th, 2020 at 7:40:50 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
He looked but never found. Hesse and Joseph Campbell lived in the same time period. Both came from very religious families, both studied for religious professions, both dropped out & became god seekers who never found god. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
June 22nd, 2020 at 4:35:56 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | This is interesting. In the late 1700's several secret fraternities were formed, the Illuminati and Freemasons among them, to skirt around the stranglehold the Catholic Church had on science and progress. Especially anything that was Protestant supported. Really smart men joined these secret societies and drove the Church nuts. How does this figure in to your claim that the Church was always open minded and supportive of all things science when obviously the opposite was true. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
June 22nd, 2020 at 4:47:55 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | First do some real research on the Freemasons and I think you will be able to see for yourself. It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures. ( |
June 22nd, 2020 at 6:49:03 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Since its inception in the 18th century the Catholic Church has vehemently opposed the Freemasons. In fact both Catholics and Jews will discriminated against by the Freemasons. But let's stick with the Illuminati. They were formed by educated men because of the stranglehold the church had on science and philosophy. At one time the Illuminati numbered 2500. How does this fit in with your statement that the church has always been open-minded about science and philosophy. If that was true why would they need to form the Illuminati. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
June 27th, 2020 at 11:30:38 AM permalink | |
aceofspades Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 83 Posts: 2019 | I can picture FrG rocking out to this song (especially with those lyrics of 'sacrifice') |
June 27th, 2020 at 11:37:38 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
I keep looking for the 'sacrifice' Jesus made and still haven't found one. He actually was hugely rewarded in the myth, none of the 100k others who died on the cross reaped the rewards like Jesus did. Xtians never talk about this. If you even bring it up they look at you like you're insane. Such is the nature of brainwashing, you aren't the one who's crazy in your cult, everybody else is. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
June 27th, 2020 at 12:35:20 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | You keep saying this as if it has value. I have already shown you that you were wrong about how Christians theologically view the sacrifice of Jesus. You also don't seem to understand the nature of sacrifice, that it should be and is rewarded. Through the sacrifice of Jesus all of those who died on the cross can receive eternal life as well as every human being who has ever died. The consequence of Jesus' sacrifice is so that all of us could go to Heaven. Once again you don't seem to get it. Everything that Jesus did was for you, for me, and for all of us. Hence the supreme nature of His sacrifice. It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures. ( |
June 27th, 2020 at 12:50:25 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Here's what you and all Xtians don't get. Something in NOT a sacrifice if you do it to be hugely rewarded. That's the fly in your stinky sacrifice ointment. If Jesus had no idea he was divine, no inkling, then what he did could be called a sacrifice. But all Xtions insist he absolutely knew he was divine. You can't have it both ways, you're painted into a corner. Surely you see that. Paul invented the whole religion, including original sin. Bart Ehrman says it should be called Paulineism, and not Xtianity. BTW, my ex priest friend said he was taught all thru seminary that Jesus died for original sin. He never questioned how Jesus died for a concept that wasn't even invented till after he died. Long after he died. The whole religion is a lie and a hoax. The biggest con ever played on man. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
June 27th, 2020 at 1:39:42 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Then we have NO problem. Jesus did not suffer and die for you and me and all of us to get rewarded. With what and how could you reward God anyway? It was a sacrificial gift.
You are equating knowing you are divine with being omniscient and they are not the same thing.
Original Sin is well....original. it has always been with us, heck it is part of the Hebrew Scriptures. A conception of original sin or understanding of it is present in every culture and every religion that has ever existed. It is the question of why we struggle and suffer and everyone must answer that question whether you are religious or not. It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures. ( |
June 27th, 2020 at 3:19:07 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Correct, he like everybody on the cross died for breaking a law or pissing somebody off. The rest of his myth was added after he dies and the urban legend grew.
And you are making it up as you go along because there are no facts to work with. You have a story, so you pick and choose the 'what if's' to fit your story like a glove. Old trick, yet people still fall for it.
Originally made up, and not that long ago. '"...also rejects the doctrine of original sin as not being original to the text of Romans 5:12. He and others see original sin as an invention of the pre-enlightenment, and more specifically an invention of the church Father Augustine of Hippo (AD 354430) who is said to have greatly influenced the Western church with this belief" In the myth Jesus died for original sin, something he knew nothing about as it hadn't been invented yet. This is why Xtianity is a myth and not reality, none of it make when examined. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |