Hey FrGamble!
October 14th, 2020 at 8:47:35 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Yeah, I can see that it is a problem, a big one. What is your solution. You don't seem very tolerant of the opinions of others who have determined what is good to them.
I have heard of collateral damage and it is NOT at all the purposeful killing of innocent people. What you describe is a war crime not collateral damage. There are of course circumstances that change the nature of a act or your guilt in committing it. However purposefully killing an innocent person is always and in every case a bad thing.
Did you really ask that? Do you know what genocide is? Would you ask, "Which rape? or which torture of children?" if asked to condemn all instances of them? Just admit it you are wrong. You seem like a wounded animal that is just lashing out unreasonably saying things more and more egregious just to avoid the fact that you need help. I'm sorry for pushing you to this point, I always think that with enough reasoning and good questioning you will simply acknowledge that you are wrong and we can move on. Instead you seem to go down the rabbit hole of more and more weird and untenable statements. Can we end this here now and save us both some heartache. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 14th, 2020 at 10:27:04 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
When he was a priest in the early 60's most Catholic's went to confession, unlike now. It was a major part of his job to listen to the same confessions over and over and over. 95% of them were sex related, lusting after somebody. After years of this it wore him down, he saw no real purpose in it. Forcing people to reveal their most intimate thoughts was none of his business, he felt.
14 year old boys do this, don't know any adults who do. Seeing a beautiful woman on a TV show and having a brief thought about her is natural, it's in our genes. Without that impulse we would never have the desire to reproduce our species. But that's the Church's job, to squash any natural sexual desire. Alan Watts was the chaplain at the U of Chicago in the 40's. He says the Church was absolutely obsessed with sex. The book on sex and sexual sins was three times as thick as all the other books put together. Those were the days when girls couldn't wear patent leather shoes because boys might be able to look up their skirts. And I Love Lucy couldn't use the word pregnant because it might trigger men into thinking of the filthy act that got her pregnant. Insanity. Watts quit the priesthood and became an authority on Eastern religions. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 15th, 2020 at 7:11:43 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
What book are you talking about? “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 15th, 2020 at 8:51:14 AM permalink | |
aceofspades Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 83 Posts: 2019 | My über-Catholic friend's most recent message to me trying to convince me to be a believer |
October 15th, 2020 at 9:34:17 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
In those days the Vatican had books of rules and guidelines for priests on every subject. Watts said the one for sex was three times thicker than all the others combined. He talks a lot about the Church's obsession with sex. He's been dead 50 years, so this is a long time ago. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 15th, 2020 at 9:56:42 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | You need to go back pretty far to find the use of "manuals" as they were called. I think he might have been using hyperbole to make a point that you took literally. There were no separate books or manuals for certain types of sins. In general our world, not the Church, makes a big deal about sex and lust. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 15th, 2020 at 10:51:53 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Nope, he was very specific about it. There were books on different subjects put out by the Vatican. Maybe they were Catechism books. But they definitely existed.
Because the Church gradually became obsessed with it! Especially after they banned priests from getting married in the 11th century. Forbid something and people become obsessed with it. And it really didn't work very well anyway. "Despite the Latin Church's historical practice of priestly celibacy, there have been Catholic priests throughout the centuries who have engaged in sexual relations through the practice of concubinage. In February 2019, the Catholic Church acknowledged that the church's celibacy policy has not always been enforced and that at some point in history, the Vatican enacted secret rules to protect priests who violated their vows of celibacy. The rules even applied to Catholic clergy who fathered children by doing so as well. Some of those who were fathered by Catholic clergy also publicly came forward." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/children-of-catholic-priests-vatican-confirms-secret-catholic-church-guidelines-for-priests-who-father-children/ If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 17th, 2020 at 3:45:39 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Do you agree with this priest? He's in huge trouble with the Vatican for speaking the truth. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 17th, 2020 at 10:55:48 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Are you aware of this story? A priest was baptized in 1990 by a priest who used the word 'we' instead of 'I' and thereby making the baptism invalid. This meant the baby wasn't really a Xtion and therefore was not a priest himself now. All the masses he gave, weddings, last rights, were all invalid. It's an insane story. https://detroitcatholic.com/news/mike-stechschulte/for-fr-hood-finding-out-his-baptism-and-ordination-were-invalid-a-blessing-in-disguise If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 18th, 2020 at 8:57:42 AM permalink | |
aceofspades Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 83 Posts: 2019 |
Sounds like something out of Harry Potter where the exact language of a spell must be used in order for it to work |