The "problem" of evil
July 8th, 2016 at 7:38:25 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
This is so, but only due to the triumph of science. granted most people don't make the connection explicitly, but everyone is aware of it implicitly, and have been for a very long time, say from the late 1700s onwards.
Because too many people use their god as a means of oppressing others, and the argument from divinity still holds terrific emotional sway. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
July 8th, 2016 at 9:31:08 AM permalink | |
pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | It's been the case from way back. Back in the day of Noah the whole world didn't care. |
July 8th, 2016 at 12:06:59 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
God is pure emotion, that's why the preacher always appeals to the believers emotional side. Science is devoid of emotion, there's no room for god. Science and religion are like oil and water, they'll never get along. Science appeals to the our rational, thinking side. Religion appeals to our irrational, non thinking side. That's why it's so repugnant to real thinking people, like atheists. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
July 8th, 2016 at 4:18:17 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | If there is anything the history of science shows us is that science and religion do go together and need to. Beyond the philosophical underpinnings girding science and creating the possibility to do science religion provides the morality science needs to makes sure that just because we can do something does not mean that we should. Both science and religion as well as everything we do besides watching Jersey Shore require of us to be rational and thinking people. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
July 8th, 2016 at 5:07:25 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Can you be any more condescending and ridiculous? The people of science are perfectly capable of having morals without the help of religion. In fact, they do a much better job of it than religious people do, as we've discussed here many times. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
July 8th, 2016 at 7:35:27 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Where would these morals come from? Science cannot create morals or test for them or observe them? Majority rules is a dangerous faulty way to arrive at our morality? Personal wishes or desires of the scientists themselves? Just as bad as depending on majority rules. No morality has to come from someplace different, outside of ourselves, universal, and something that resonates with our reason and nature. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
July 8th, 2016 at 7:49:15 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Of course they do. The former debunks the latter. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
July 8th, 2016 at 8:14:29 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
They are totally different fields, they don't debunk each other but they support and help each other. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
July 8th, 2016 at 8:31:14 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18757 |
It comes from common interest, reason and logic combined. It may take a little more than initial thoughts to learn to treat the handicapped more like everyone else, but it can be arrived at through reason and common interest. I suspect there was a slow realization that virtually anyone could be in the difficult position of being handicapped. So, eventually, running the handicapped through with a spear gave way to, "it could be me" in that position if I become lame in some manner. Or they laughed if it was someone elses' family member, but realized it was terrible if it was their family member. Of course, the ability to serve people in greater capacity than just survival mode lead to more sympathetic results in societies. But that was also a logical result. I didn't employ morals, just logic and common interest to arrive at that. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
July 8th, 2016 at 8:36:11 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
All morality comes from common sense. We know this because we see societies that have been cut off from organized religion entirely had no trouble coming up with their morals. Trial and error and you soon have a workable society. God had nothing to do with it. You're always selling people short, why is that. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |