Challenge to FrGamble
August 26th, 2016 at 8:52:55 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
No I didn't. I mentioned it in my first post because it ties into number #1. Science has exhaustively proven prayer doesn't work, it's an exercise in self gratification. Places like Lourdes have been studied for over a hundred years and have been shown to be no more effective than random chance. But of course you worship at the feet of urban legend, where facts are meaningless. Lourdes is a tourist trap. "Only 67 'miracles' have been validated by the Church. Over the past 150 years, some 200 million people have made the pilgrimage to Lourdes. For those who care, that's a success rate of .0000335% or 1 out of every 3 million. Furthermore, since 1947 anyone claiming a miraculous cure has to go before a medical board. "From 1947 to 1990, only 1,000 cures were claimed and only 56 were recognized in that time, averaging 1.3 cures a year, against 57 a year before 1914."* Since 1978, there have been only four recognized cures. So, if you're thinking of going to Lourdes for a miracle cure, the odds are not very high in your favor." 1 in 3 million is far worse than random chance. Why did you even mention the place. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
August 26th, 2016 at 9:12:59 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
It is most definitely NOT in my imagination. Why would you say that? Do you have evidence that it is only in my imagination? I promise you that you could experience it too. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
August 26th, 2016 at 9:19:58 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Ha, talk about urban legend. Please stop trying to stuff prayer into a test tube. How do you control for this? How do you deal with the misconception these scientific tests have about prayer, which you have not addressed as of yet?
What is the random chance for a miraculous cure do you think? Are you taking into consideration all the many cures that are not reported and gone through the extensive investigation by the Church? Are you accounting for all the spiritual miracles of hearts and lives that are changed? Go to Lourdes and it will change your life. If this is way below the random chance healing number what percentage of cures happen at the Grand Canyon, there are a lot of people that go there every year? It's a long and funny story, but I did get deathly ill at Lourdes when I went. I also learned how to smoke a cigar while in Lourdes. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
August 26th, 2016 at 10:15:08 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
More to the point, you have zero evidence it's not just your imagination. That's why the man who offered 1 million to anybody who could prove the supernatural is real still has his money. Subjective experience is anecdotal at best, and mostly worthless. I could take peyote and experience lots of gods. Means nothing. You've taught yourself how to do it without a drug. Still means nothing to anybody but you. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
August 26th, 2016 at 10:21:14 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Some of the hospital prayer tests took years by universities and cost millions. They all showed prayer healed exactly at the same level as random chance.
0%, miracles don't exist. You're desperate, so the tiniest thing is miracle to you. Somebody goes to Lourdes and stops sniffling and isn't farting crossways anymore and it's a miracle. You never hear about the millions who felt nothing, or got worse. They don't count. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
August 27th, 2016 at 8:53:02 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Witness testimony is very important. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
August 27th, 2016 at 8:55:22 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Again the hypothesis of the experiment was based on a misunderstanding of prayer.
The evidence says a very different thing.
You don't go to Lourdes and feel nothing. Like me you might feel physically worse, but you feel loved. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
August 27th, 2016 at 9:11:28 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
You turn every topic into love, you seem obsessed with it. What you need is a little dog, he'll teach you what real love is. Maybe then you can get over your idealized idea of it. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
August 28th, 2016 at 2:24:27 AM permalink | |
Aussie Member since: May 10, 2016 Threads: 2 Posts: 458 |
I have seen this line of argument used before and it is basically used by people who can't comprehend that even events with a minuscule chance of occurring do happen. They take the position that because the chance of something happening it so tiny then it couldn't possibly have happened. Of course the reality is that these things DO occur. A combination of numbers will be randomly drawn the next time you have a power ball drawing and the chance of that specific event happening will be in the hundred of millions to one. The god people would argue that something with such a tiny chance of happening couldn't possibly occur. Wrong. |
August 28th, 2016 at 7:00:14 AM permalink | |
pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | By definition naturalism/atheism says the random chance of a miracle is 0 so there is no chance, minuscule or otherwise. I think that may have been F.R.s point. |