Home » Controversial Topics » Politics » Abraham Lincoln is in aggregate ranked as America's greatest president
Abraham Lincoln is in aggregate ranked as America's greatest president
November 23rd, 2016 at 3:32:39 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | A great deal of the conflict leading up the USCW had to do with the states and territories acquired by Polk. So the Manifest Destiny meme also cost the lives of 600,000 mostly white Americans. Want to joke about that, too? Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
November 23rd, 2016 at 3:48:55 PM permalink | |
Ayecarumba Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 89 Posts: 1744 |
Are you saying Lincoln should have avoided conflict with the South and let the CSA and slavery continue to exist in order to save White lives? |
November 23rd, 2016 at 3:54:33 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
I'm saying had Polk not gone aconquerin' like a Roman emperor, the whole thing might have been avoided, while things gradually changed. Support for slavery had been slipping, even in the South. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
November 23rd, 2016 at 5:10:10 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
It is possibly the greatest "what if" of American History. Polk's election in 1844 started the bloodiest two decades of USA's existence. Henry Clay was anti-annexation of Texas and tried preserve North-South sectional unity and to avoid war with Mexico. He lost by less than 2% of the popular vote. Many historians felt that slavery would have ended anyway. Brazil ended slavery without war (in 1888). Brazil probably imported 10X the number of slaves from Africa as British North America. |
November 23rd, 2016 at 6:20:59 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Many historians cite Eli Whitney as, unwittingly, extending the grip of slavery for decades. The notion is that without the cotton gin to process cotton quickly, efficiently and economically, there'd have been no use for large cotton plantations in the south. Anyway, had there'd been no civil war and no threats of secession, slavery would either have ended or the country would have split, albeit in a different fashion. Most of the alternate histories surrounding the civil war have the south winning one way or another, and then there's a look at the consequences later on. I can think of a few exceptions, and then it's the north that wins but differently (ie Lincoln gets killed visiting the front, or by southern terrorists, or he hunts vampires in his spare time or something). I know of none where the war never happens, or that looks at a different resolution to the conflict with Mexico. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
November 23rd, 2016 at 8:01:42 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
Well, you are better versed in alternative histories than I am. But there is a TV show called "Timeless" where a group of three time travelers are pursuing another time traveler who is bent on destroying the USA. At one point he goes to the Alamo and befriends Santa Anna. He also murders William Travis before he writes the letter below. The argument is that the letter is what rallies Texas to win the Texas Revolution (October 2, 1835 - April 21, 1836) . In turn the Texas Revolution leads to the Mexican American War (April 25, 1846 - February 3, 1848) a decade later. Than without California becoming a "free" state, there is no major instigation for the Civil War (April 12, 1861 - May 9, 1865). At some point (it's not clear how), the America we know is destroyed.
|
November 23rd, 2016 at 8:25:03 PM permalink | |
Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 239 Posts: 6095 | I sometimes wonder what would have happened if Lincoln let the Confederate states split off. We will never know, but I wonder if choosing the Civil War was the greater sin. Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |
November 24th, 2016 at 4:22:20 AM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
The constitution was over 70 years old, and the South had only one moderate size city. Slavery was vanishing over most of the world, so conventional wisdom was that the South would have simply collapsed economically and asked to rejoin the Union. Rank City State Population (1860) 01 New York New York 813,669 02 Philadelphia Pennsylvania 565,529 03 Brooklyn New York 266,661 04 Baltimore Maryland 212,418 05 Boston Massachusetts 177,840 06 New Orleans Louisiana 168,675 Personally, I think that without the threat of military action, Europe (especially Britain) would have continued to purchase cotton from the Confederate states and they would have functioned economically as a slave state as long or longer than Brazil (1888). Even with the civil war, there was still no major cities in the South until close to WWII. Rank | Place |1930 Population| (sq miles)|pop/sq. mile) ---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 New York city, NY *...... 6,930,446 299.0 23,179 2 Chicago city, IL......... 3,376,438 201.9 16,723 3 Philadelphia city, PA.... 1,950,961 128.0 15,242 4 Detroit city, MI......... 1,568,662 137.9 11,375 5 Los Angeles city, CA..... 1,238,048 440.3 2,812 6 Cleveland city, OH....... 900,429 70.8 12,718 7 St. Louis city, MO....... 821,960 61.0 13,475 8 Baltimore city, MD....... 804,874 78.7 10,227 9 Boston city, MA.......... 781,188 43.9 17,795 10 Pittsburgh city, PA...... 669,817 51.3 13,057 11 San Francisco city, CA... 634,394 42.0 15,105 12 Milwaukee city, WI....... 578,249 41.1 14,069 13 Buffalo city, NY......... 573,076 38.9 14,732 14 Washington city, DC...... 486,869 62.0 7,853 15 Minneapolis city, MN..... 464,356 55.4 8,382 16 New Orleans city, LA..... 458,762 196.0 2,341 17 Cincinnati city, OH...... 451,160 71.4 6,319 18 Newark city, NJ.......... 442,337 23.6 18,743 19 Kansas City city, MO..... 399,746 58.6 6,822 20 Seattle city, WA......... 365,583 68.5 5,337 |
November 24th, 2016 at 4:48:14 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18204 |
Germany would dominate Europe. Japan would be an empire in the Pacific. Slavery would have died out by 1880, for sure 1900. Slaves would have probably been shipped to Africa or "Negro Reservations" similar to Indian Reservations. The President is a fink. |
November 24th, 2016 at 6:41:49 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Not really. I keep finding disappointment and replay in most stories... IMO, it's a cultural thing. Most Americans don't regard the USCW as something bad or terrible, even when considering what it cost in blood and treasure. On the contrary, it's a "good" war. To this day there are southern sympathizers and apologists who keep attempting to whitewash the south, as though slavery wasn't the main reason for secession.
Interesting. Very Asimovian in concept (Minimum Necessary Change). I should try to look it up. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |