Six girls, five sets of legs

Quote: Face

Easy game.
...
That little white blip is the girl second-from-right's sock.

I think that Face has it correct. But "right" is from the girl's perspective, not the photographer.

The problem is that three girls are sitting on a hip.Sort of like this girl is sitting, but not as extreme.



While the image is not photoshopped, it doesn't have a lot of contrast to see the difference between the two girls black pants.

Just tell me whose basement rec room this is and how he managed to get all those good looking broads to do the posing?

Quote: Pacomartin

I think that Face has it correct. But "right" is from the girl's perspective, not the photographer.

Precisely.

Face said:

"The wine glass girl is leaning left with her hips shifted right. The ripped blue jeans are wine glass girl's.
The girl to her right is sitting similarly, but is wearing black pants that meld with the girl on the far right. If you follow the far rights black jeans from the rip down, you can see a faint line demarking the two different legs. That little white blip is the girl second-from-right's sock."

I don't see that at all. The girl on far left
is just sitting there. 2nd girl is sitting with
her left leg under her. Her right leg
is crossed over the 3rd girls leg to make
it look like a pair. The 4th girl is leaning
right and has her left leg leg tucked under
her. She is almost sitting in the 3rd girls
lap with her right leg crossed over the
3rd girls other leg to make it look like
a pair. It gives the illusion of one girl
missing her legs.

Quote: Pacomartin

I agree with JB's explanation.

Quote: Wizard

I agree with JB's explanation.

I don't buy it. That one girl would really have the other girls leg shoved up her butt in a way that would make a pornographer blush.

Quote: Pacomartin

I don't buy it. That one girl would really have the other girls leg shoved up her butt in a way that would make a pornographer blush.
]

The girl in the middle obviously has her
legs spread wide apart, take it from there
and it's easy.

Quote: Evenbob

It's plain as day.

I disagree. The girl holding the beer bottle does not have one leg with a 30 inch diameter. The black pants that have a hole in the knee belong to the girl next to her. Her other leg is obscured. Because they are both black pants they tend to run into one another. The next two girls are leaning on one hip.



I don't think this photo was staged. They simply took the picture, then afterwards noticed that one set of legs seems to be missing. Although it is possible that they had several photos and eliminated ones where you could see the shoes.

To accompany the image of the girl with a missing leg is this helpful motel sign that assures you that you can relax and read a book once you've purchased access to a hotel safe.

I am with Face if he agrees the middle girl [wine-glass] has her left leg hidden behind the two girls to her left. I can't see how you can dispute the black leg with the sock bit.

I can't follow EB's explanation because he can't describe 'which girl is which' to my satisfaction.

As for JB,

Quote: JB

Here's my guess:

It looks like the middle girl on the couch, her legs are the ones on the bottom,

that would be wine glass girl. What is meant by "the ones on the bottom"? that expression makes no sense to me.

Quote:

spread apart (the red oval is almost perfectly between her two legs).

so what?

Quote:

Each of her neighbors has one leg on top of middle girl's legs, making it look like two matching crossed pairs.

my view is that the girl to the left of wine-glass-girl is just showing her two legs normally, but she and her neighbor hide wine-glass-girl's left leg

Quote:

The two "missing" legs are likely being sat on or otherwise obscured from view.

we must get to the bottom of this !! - but without "legs on the bottom"