FBI Director Comey

Page 3 of 25<123456>Last »
May 9th, 2017 at 7:00:27 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 12
Posts: 2234
Quote: AZDuffman
Insult? Your standards for an insult are lower than mine. That was a return-jab. Anytime I have worked or been around men to call that an insult would drop you to omega-male status.


Huh?

Again, when you try to insult you often don't make sense.
In order to insult me, I must first value your opinion
May 10th, 2017 at 1:15:08 AM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 110
Posts: 11603
The Libs are going batshit crazy over Comey
being fired, yet called him every name in
the book over Hillary. Even She said last
week Comey was a main reason she lost.
This is just too hilarious..
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
May 10th, 2017 at 2:48:26 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 103
Posts: 6772
Quote: ams288
Huh?


Huh what?
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
May 10th, 2017 at 5:45:35 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 12
Posts: 2234
There is a new idea in the Senate to now get Comey to lead the Senate's investigation into Russia. How great would that be? Donald would lose his mind (more than he already has...)
In order to insult me, I must first value your opinion
May 10th, 2017 at 6:07:06 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 103
Posts: 6772
Quote: ams288
There is a new idea in the Senate to now get Comey to lead the Senate's investigation into Russia. How great would that be? Donald would lose his mind (more than he already has...)


What would be great is if a liberal could explain exactly what the Russians were supposed to have done.
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
May 10th, 2017 at 6:20:26 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 12
Posts: 2234
Quote: AZDuffman
What would be great is if a liberal could explain exactly what the Russians were supposed to have done.


Liberals have explained it over and over again. You just refuse to listen.
In order to insult me, I must first value your opinion
May 10th, 2017 at 6:21:56 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 5
Posts: 245
Quote: AZDuffman
What would be great is if a liberal could explain exactly what the Russians were supposed to have done.


i am NOT a liberal, but as I understand it, they would say that the Russians hacked the Democrats emails, then exposed them to the public. The American people learning the true agenda of the Democrat leaders led directly to a meaningful number of voters switching from the Democrat leader (HRC) to the only other realistic option available (DJT). Since in a few states just a few percent swing was meaningful, you could argue that if the American people were unaware of what the Democrat Party really stood for, then HRC would be President now.
May 10th, 2017 at 6:26:25 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 103
Posts: 6772
Quote: ams288
Liberals have explained it over and over again. You just refuse to listen.


No, they have not. They just say the Russians interfered. Never any details beyond that.
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
May 10th, 2017 at 6:29:43 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 12
Posts: 2234
Quote: AZDuffman
No, they have not. They just say the Russians interfered. Never any details beyond that.


Here you go, all the details summed up nicely for you. Now bury that head back in the sand and ignore this:

In order to insult me, I must first value your opinion
May 10th, 2017 at 6:33:01 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 103
Posts: 6772
Quote: SOOPOO
i am NOT a liberal, but as I understand it, they would say that the Russians hacked the Democrats emails, then exposed them to the public. The American people learning the true agenda of the Democrat leaders led directly to a meaningful number of voters switching from the Democrat leader (HRC) to the only other realistic option available (DJT). Since in a few states just a few percent swing was meaningful, you could argue that if the American people were unaware of what the Democrat Party really stood for, then HRC would be President now.


Thanks, that is the kind of answer I have wanted liberals to man-up and give.

I guess the argument could be made, though I would counter that the outright contempt for working class whites on the part of the Democrats is what broke the Blue Wall.

As to the hacking, from what I heard the FBI called both NCs and said to beef up security on servers.
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
Page 3 of 25<123456>Last »