The Trump Dossier

It appears that the ads that the Russian were paying for were aimed at destabilizing the US rather than actually effecting the election. There is no reason to think that Russia still doesn't have that as a goal. Wouldn't it be ironic if Russia was the main source of the Russian influence rumours just to keep anything from being accomplished in the country due to dissent?

Quote: Evenbob

Remember this?

Flashback: How the Media Went Hysterical over Don Jr.’s Willingness to Accept Russian Dirt on Hillary ‘He’s going to jail’

Hillary bought and paid for fake dirt
on Trump, where's the outrage. LOL

I tend to agree. Anyone who gets all spun up about one of these events but dismisses the other as a nothing burger is probably blinded by partisanship.

Quote: JimRockford

I tend to agree. Anyone who gets all spun up about one of these events but dismisses the other as a nothing burger is probably blinded by partisanship.

"Both sides-ism" has reared its ugly head in this thread. It's like we are being haunted by the ghost of RonC.

Quote: JimRockford

I tend to agree. Anyone who gets all spun up about one of these events but dismisses the other as a nothing burger is probably blinded by partisanship.

It's not the getting of dirt on an opponent. That's politics as usual.

It's getting dirt on an opponent in exchange for doing favors for a foreign, hostile power.

So the question isn't whether the Orange Twit or his minions got oppo research from Russia, but what they promised to give the Russian government in return (even if they don't deliver). It would aslo count as collusion if, say, the Trunmpsters asked the Russians to hack the DNC server.

The Pee tape dossier,a s far as I know, was not requested from the Russians, but rather from a private company, presumably in exchange for money.

I'll do you one better and say if Trump traded sucking Vlad's dick for stolen emails, that's not grounds for impeachment. the rank incompetence, the wanton breaking of treaties, the mad rush into conflict, and the monetizing of the post, are a different matter.

CnnMs are doubling down today on the
validity of the dossier story, it's comical
to see. What else can they do, egg is
splattered all over their faces, they've
been ranting for almost a year about a
fake story. Now they're rats looking for
a way off the sinking ship.

We've known since January they the dossier was opposition research. Now it we find out that it was funded by his opposition. Bombshell, revelation, this changes everything.

Quote: JimRockford

We've known since January they the dossier was opposition research. .

But it's not. It's a work of fiction meant
to destroy Trump if he did manage to
get elected. Now it's blown up in their
faces. It's amazing how all the pieces
of the jigsaw puzzle fit together when
you have all the pieces. Hannity says
he's had a series of 'Aha!' moments
this week, now things make sense.

Quote: Evenbob

But it's not. It's a work of fiction meant
to destroy Trump if he did manage to
get elected.

lol

They still can't provide any sources proving this. But they keep repeating it. It's honestly sad.

Quote: ams288

lol

They still can't provide any sources proving this. But they keep repeating it. It's honestly sad.

Doubleplusungood.

hey lil man.................remember dis tweet???

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!