Am I an agnostic or an atheist?
Poll
8 votes (50%) | |||
7 votes (43.75%) | |||
1 vote (6.25%) |
16 members have voted
October 1st, 2015 at 5:05:11 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Baloney. If that were true the prisons would be empty. What's clearly evident is as a society we have rules for living together and teach it to our kids. Remember the cannibalistic tribes in England? Their morality said it was fine to eat a stranger for dinner. They slept very well that night with a full stomach and the universe could care less. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 1st, 2015 at 6:24:34 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | I don't understand your comment about jail? Are you saying that there is no moral law higher than yourself? About those cannabals you can ask yourself a simple question. Given the option of plenty of good food vs the continued killing and eating of innocent people what would they choose? “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 1st, 2015 at 6:48:51 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
So you're saying morality is adaptable to your circumstances? If you're starving it's OK to eat people? I agree. Morality comes from you, not from the outside. Morality doesn't permeate the universe, waiting to be 'discovered'. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 1st, 2015 at 7:14:20 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | What I'm trying to say is that cannibalism and murder are always wrong. Circumstances can make such evil understandable, but we still feel bad about it and given a choice we will always want to do what is right. Hope that is a little more clear. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 1st, 2015 at 7:18:52 PM permalink | |
petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | http://newobserveronline.com/cannibalism-still-stalks-african-conflicts/ Apparently they choose to eat human flesh. Also cannibalism isn't always about getting the protein, it is about control. Just as rape isn't usually about sex, it is about domination. The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
October 1st, 2015 at 7:21:06 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Not really. War has always been a religious excuse to rape, murder and pillage. Christian soldiers were given medals for atrocities they committed in wars, and they performed them with relish. Men went to war willingly and with gusto, knowing they could put aside, at least for awhile, what was the 'right' thing to do, and kill and rape and steal with the full blessing of whatever church they belonged to. The victors didn't go home weeping at what they done, they went home with spoils and stories and their heads held high. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 1st, 2015 at 7:29:56 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | You are making no sense and your knowledge of history is so perverted and twisted as to not be worthy of response. You also don't seem to have a sense of human nature and the desire we have for doing good and the shame we feel for doing wrong. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 1st, 2015 at 8:32:26 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Nope. The rules of morality were suspended in war. Where do you think the Geneva Conventions eventually came from? Why do you think they were needed if wars were so ethical and moralistic? Religious wars especially. 'The Geneva Conventions are rules that apply in times of armed conflict and seek to protect people who are not or are no longer taking part in hostilities; these include the sick and wounded of armed forces on the field, wounded, sick, and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, prisoners of war, and civilians.' If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 1st, 2015 at 10:00:30 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | As John Paul II said, "War is always a failure of humanity." The fact that even in the midst of war we expect human beings to still follow the moral laws is clearly evidence that even when we so radically fail as society and engage in war, we are still subject to a moral law that is above and beyond us. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 1st, 2015 at 11:07:33 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
It's evidence that we are evolving as a society. We can no longer have the Holy See, for instance, hiring mercenaries to do their dirty work in Crusades. Those were interesting times for the Church. These hired savages would be blessed personally by a high member of the Church and given a holy exemption to do whatever they wanted to whoever they wanted, as long as it was in the name of Jesus. They're still looking at the aftermath of this in the Muslim attitude towards the Church today. They indeed have a lonnnnnng memory of the atrocities done to them by the Church. Nice, huh. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |