The Gay Thread

November 20th, 2020 at 5:39:57 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18204
Quote: Gandler
Go look at the records.

Virtually 100% of the men in BSA who were offenders were straight-married (most) or identified as straight and had kids via heterosexual sex.....

This is not even up for dispute.

They were "straight-married men", this is a correct description....

There was not a single gay-married man involved in BSA lawsuits or criminal cases.... And, I can't even find a record of one who identified as gay......

If you can point me to a public record of a gay-married man or even a man who identified as gay or bi involved in these cases I would happily stand corrected.... (though even if you somehow find one or two, the stats still stand that virtually all were straight-married or identified as straight).... There are endless public records involving these incidents, so it should be easy to find....


Talking to you on this is like talking to the wall.

STRAIGHT MALES DO NOT INITIATE GAY SEX! If they did they would no longer be straight.

Married has nothing to do with it, they use the women as beards. If you do not know what a beard is go use the urban dictionary.

I've had enough of this.
The President is a fink.
November 20th, 2020 at 5:42:53 PM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 22
Posts: 4171
Quote: Gandler


They were "straight-married men", this is a correct description....
And, I can't even find a record of one who identified as gay......
...


It is NOT a correct description. They were either gay or bi men who were married to women. I could not give a crap as to what they ‘identify’ as! As soon as they had sex with boys they were GAY, or bisexual. THEY WERE NOT STRAIGHT no matter how they identified!!!

This is NOT a difficult concept, but for some reason it can’t seep into some....
November 20th, 2020 at 5:59:19 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18758
Quote: SOOPOO
It is NOT a correct description. They were either gay or bi men who were married to women. I could not give a crap as to what they ‘identify’ as! As soon as they had sex with boys they were GAY, or bisexual. THEY WERE NOT STRAIGHT no matter how they identified!!!

This is NOT a difficult concept, but for some reason it can’t seep into some....


LOL, I don't how many times I've heard proof from the right put in terms of "this is what they said"
is proof that something is true.

Oh yeah, here's an example. "Women love abortion" is proof the entire left loves abortion because some women apparently said that.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
November 20th, 2020 at 6:00:42 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18758
Duffman getting back some of his own bitter medicine. That's why it's funny.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
November 20th, 2020 at 6:26:45 PM permalink
Shrek
Member since: Aug 13, 2019
Threads: 6
Posts: 1635
Quote: SOOPOO
It is NOT a correct description. They were either gay or bi men who were married to women. I could not give a crap as to what they ‘identify’ as! As soon as they had sex with boys they were GAY, or bisexual. THEY WERE NOT STRAIGHT no matter how they identified!!!
Now you know why I blocked him. It's impossible to have an open & honest debate with people like him.


Quote: AZDuffman
Talking to you on this is like talking to the wall.

STRAIGHT MALES DO NOT INITIATE GAY SEX! If they did they would no longer be straight.

Married has nothing to do with it, they use the women as beards. If you do not know what a beard is go use the urban dictionary.

I've had enough of this.
Now you know why I blocked him. It's impossible to have an open & honest debate with people like him.



Male A has sex with Male B, yet this guy wants to deny that Male A is gay.

There should really be a rule against people making idiotic statements like this.
November 20th, 2020 at 6:27:56 PM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 27
Posts: 4256
Quote: SOOPOO
It is NOT a correct description. They were either gay or bi men who were married to women. I could not give a crap as to what they ‘identify’ as! As soon as they had sex with boys they were GAY, or bisexual. THEY WERE NOT STRAIGHT no matter how they identified!!!

This is NOT a difficult concept, but for some reason it can’t seep into some....


But, you concede that the men are or were at the time legally married to women (straight-married) [again in most cases -virtually all-]?

And, since they have children they clearly had heterosexual sex at least once (again probably some rare exceptions you can dredge up of adoptions and prior marriages etc...)?

So calling them "straight-married" is a correct term (again for most cases, virtually all, so yes, generalizing).

I liked your earlier point of not wanting to get into semantics, but since you are going this route:
Just about every gay man I know has had some type of sex with at least one woman (generally more than one), did they cease to be gay as soon as they had sex with a woman?
Of course not because this would be absurd (but this logic is constantly used in reverse).....

Also, I can point to straight men (and far more straight women, I suspect the rates are similar, but women are just more willing to talk about it, probably because it is more socially acceptable) who have had some sort of homosexual experiment. Are they forever gay because they had a desire to try such an act at one point in their life?

It seems that people are only willing to throw on the label of "forever gay" when the encounter is nonconsensual and abusive.... It is a modern way of generalizing gays as more sexually predatorial.

Somebody on here some time back (I can't remember if it was you or not, so I will be careful not to attribute) even said that (paraphrasing) : "gay sex in prison regardless of consent does not count, because its the only option, so its not fair to label prior imamates as gay regardless of sex while incarnated" …. Which does not seem to mash with any of the other stated views of your side of somebody being "gay" if they ever have any kind of homosexual encounter willingly….
November 20th, 2020 at 9:21:03 PM permalink
Aussie
Member since: May 10, 2016
Threads: 2
Posts: 458
Quote: AZDuffman
Talking to you on this is like talking to the wall.

STRAIGHT MALES DO NOT INITIATE GAY SEX! If they did they would no longer be straight.

Married has nothing to do with it, they use the women as beards. If you do not know what a beard is go use the urban dictionary.

I've had enough of this.




From all reports you are celebrate. At least you have indicated that you have given up on finding a romantic partner. The actual reasons for that are possibly a discussion for another thread but nevertheless, why you think that you have any idea how any orientation acts or what they want is anyone’s guess. Get back to us when you are back out there in the real world actually pursuing women like real single straight men and not sitting in the faculty lounge prognosticating.
November 20th, 2020 at 10:59:26 PM permalink
Shrek
Member since: Aug 13, 2019
Threads: 6
Posts: 1635
Quote: Aussie
From all reports you are celebrate. At least you have indicated that you have given up on finding a romantic partner. The actual reasons for that are possibly a discussion for another thread but nevertheless, why you think that you have any idea how any orientation acts or what they want is anyone’s guess. Get back to us when you are back out there in the real world actually pursuing women like real single straight men and not sitting in the faculty lounge prognosticating.

I don't know how the hell you got unblocked, but it will be satisfying to block your ass again. Instead of agreeing with AZ and SOOPOO that males who have sex with other males are gay, you choose to go and make personal attacks. Typical libbie.

You libbies can't put together a decent argument to save your life. but that's ok because you are now banished to my block list once again..............

Buh-bye! BLOCKED
November 20th, 2020 at 11:08:02 PM permalink
Aussie
Member since: May 10, 2016
Threads: 2
Posts: 458
Quote: Shrek
I don't know how the hell you got unblocked, but it will be satisfying to block your ass again. Instead of agreeing with AZ and SOOPOO that males who have sex with other males are gay, you choose to go and make personal attacks. Typical libbie.

You libbies can't put together a decent argument to save your life. but that's ok because you are now banished to my block list once again..............

Buh-bye! BLOCKED



An attack? You have a vivid imagination. I can see why you believe the election fraud conspiracy.

You say I’m blocked like it’s something I would be concerned about. Too funny! I don’t know how I got unblocked either. Maybe it was when you were getting ready to send me that private message you promised after Trump won. What a shame.
November 21st, 2020 at 1:11:46 AM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: AZDuffman
Talking to you on this is like talking to the wall.
STRAIGHT MALES DO NOT INITIATE GAY SEX! If they did they would no longer be straight.
.


It's what the newer generations strive for, I call it
the Roddenberry effect. It's why I stopped watching
Star Trek 30years ago. They want a future that's
vanilla, where all cultures merge into one culture.
Where people wander in and out of sexual
relationships with whoever they please, either
sex, and nobody cares or even notices. Where
 all drugs are readily available and the planet
is one huge Socialist paradise.
Never gonna happen, the Muslims and Xtians
will see to that. Organized religion does have
it's positive uses, even tho I'm an atheist.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.