The Coronavirus thread
Poll
2 votes (13.33%) | |||
2 votes (13.33%) | |||
2 votes (13.33%) | |||
1 vote (6.66%) | |||
2 votes (13.33%) | |||
4 votes (26.66%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (6.66%) | |||
1 vote (6.66%) |
15 members have voted
September 27th, 2021 at 11:41:59 AM permalink | |
JCW09 Member since: Aug 27, 2018 Threads: 12 Posts: 847 |
Kinda inconvenient that the real 2020 GDP numbers are: Sweden -1.4% Denmark -3.3% Norway -4.5% Source Statista.com Def. of Liar - "A Person Who Tells Lies" / "I lied. Deal with it" - ams288 |
September 27th, 2021 at 11:56:45 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 188 Posts: 18633 |
All I know is it was was supposedly sourced from the World Bank, which is considered highly reliable. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
September 27th, 2021 at 12:45:42 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 188 Posts: 18633 | I thought this chart was from the World Bank site at first, But it's not. but I did find the kind of chart I was was looking for anyway. Not the GDP, but percent of change from year to year. It's the chart labeled "Real GDP Percent of Change" The three numbers represent years 2018, 2019, and 2020 Sweden 2.0, 1.3,- 4.7 Denmark 2.4, 2.4, -4.5 Norway 1.3, 1.2, -2.8 https://knoema.com/nwnfkne/world-gdp-ranking-2020-gdp-by-country-data-and-charts You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
September 27th, 2021 at 1:47:38 PM permalink | |
JCW09 Member since: Aug 27, 2018 Threads: 12 Posts: 847 | And from your site now, here are the GDP's for 2019 & 2020 listed in Current Prices ($Billions): Denmark: $347.0/$339.6/ -2.1% Norway: $403.3/$366.4/ -9.1% Sweden: $530.9/$529.1/ -0.3% So now please argue that the inflation formula built into real GDP is super important when looking at two successive years. It's not! Def. of Liar - "A Person Who Tells Lies" / "I lied. Deal with it" - ams288 |
September 27th, 2021 at 4:22:49 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25010 | The Beijing Joe Crime Family Administration just let us know how serious they are about vaccinations. In the last 5 days they took the entire totally unvaccinated 12000 people from under the bridge in Texas put them on Planes Trains and Automobiles and shipped them all over United States to mingle with the general population. What a bunch of laughable hypocrites they are, nothing they say can be believed. And you wonder why me and AZ don't get vaccinated. How much of a real threat are non-vaccinated people to the general population if the government can do something like this. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 27th, 2021 at 4:31:18 PM permalink | |
ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12422 |
Because you want to catch Covid from some of these migrants? Those of us who have our shots have nothing to worry about. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
September 27th, 2021 at 7:48:21 PM permalink | |
terapined Member since: Aug 6, 2014 Threads: 73 Posts: 11786 | Sheriff to teen Take down your posts or you will be arrested Judge to Sheriff WTF were you thinking https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/27/wisconsin-sheriff-covid-teen-instagram-post Sometimes we live no particular way but our own - Grateful Dead "Eyes of the World" |
September 28th, 2021 at 11:27:22 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25010 | The first big study of masks is in from Bangladesh. A United States funded study the lasted 5 months found that cloth masks are worthless. In the control groups the people who wore surgical masks had 11% fewer cases of covid then the people who wore no masks at all. It was a big study involving over 300,000 people. So doctor Frankenstein Fuji was right when he said right at the beginning that masks don't really work. 11% is not a significant number. 50 or 60% would be significant, 11% is basically a little better than nothing. Social distancing, not being close to someone who's infected, works the best. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
September 28th, 2021 at 11:37:11 AM permalink | |
ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12422 |
The comedic wit. Absolutely brilliant. How did you miss your calling as a stand up comic?! “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
September 28th, 2021 at 5:15:04 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25010 |
Masks do prevent a lot of the spread covid. It's tough for much of the virus to get through mask even if you're talking or coughing. But they lied to us when they said masks will prevent you from getting covid because if they told us the truth almost nobody would wear masks because they don't believe they have the disease. So looking at it that way masks were probably effective in keeping the spread of it down. That's the reason everybody wears a mask during surgery, not to protect themselves they wear it to protect the patient. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |