Stimulus

April 5th, 2020 at 11:38:29 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18204
Quote: SOOPOO
Guys, come on! My company was what I believe is called an S corporation. We paid ZERO in taxes. ZERO. All you had to do was distribute all the money that we made by December 31. So the corporation had zero profit. Each member who received money got a K-1 form. I was individually responsible to declare the income. I had to pay my own share of FICA as well as Medicare tax.
LOL at we couldn't get a loan because we didn't pay ourselves salaries! LOL! When we once needed a loan we just showed the bank our last two years collections and we got the loan. I think it took around 24 hours to approve.
On an average year I'd get around $50k in those 4 quarterly distributions. But one bad year it was $35k. A good year it was $60k. Since none of us needed a specific amount at any time, and we really couldn't be sure what it would be, it made total sense to do it the way we did.

Thinking back to my old job.... Instead of doing it fully the full distribution every quarter, we did a "draw" each month of $12k. So we 'guaranteed' ourselves $144k. Then each quarter we'd distribute whatever was left over. Maybe Bob calls a 'draw' a salary, but it really is not. As owners of the company, if there wasn't enough money to fund the $12k each month, we wouldn't get the $12k.

Just like my recent job, we emptied the account fully on December 31, and paid no corporate taxes.


Exactly. You take a draw and pay taxes on that. The IRS is fine with it. For a loan the UW will want to see enough reserves to cover until the draw.
The President is a fink.
April 6th, 2020 at 5:23:21 AM permalink
RonC
Member since: Nov 7, 2012
Threads: 8
Posts: 2501
Quote: AZDuffman
Exactly. You take a draw and pay taxes on that. The IRS is fine with it. For a loan the UW will want to see enough reserves to cover until the draw.


Like anything else, it is complicated:

"However, an S corporation must pay reasonable employee compensation (subject to employment taxes) to a shareholder-employee in return for the services the employee provides before a distribution (not subject to employment taxes) may be given to the shareholder-employee."

"For example, a CPA who incorporated his practice took a $24,000 annual salary from his S corporation and received $220,000 in dividends which were free of employment taxes. The IRS said that his salary was unreasonably low and that $175,000 of the dividends should be treated as wages subject to employment taxes. The court upheld the IRS’s power to recharacterize the dividends as wages subject to employment tax. (Watson v. United States, (DC IA 05/27/2010) 105 AFTR 2d."

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/s-corporations-salaries-an-irs-hot-button-issue.html

Asking a good accountant first is the best way to proceed, not all of us amateurs here...since we may have understanding of certain situations but not of all of them.
April 6th, 2020 at 5:45:16 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18204
Quote: RonC
Like anything else, it is complicated:

"However, an S corporation must pay reasonable employee compensation (subject to employment taxes) to a shareholder-employee in return for the services the employee provides before a distribution (not subject to employment taxes) may be given to the shareholder-employee."

"For example, a CPA who incorporated his practice took a $24,000 annual salary from his S corporation and received $220,000 in dividends which were free of employment taxes. The IRS said that his salary was unreasonably low and that $175,000 of the dividends should be treated as wages subject to employment taxes. The court upheld the IRS’s power to recharacterize the dividends as wages subject to employment tax. (Watson v. United States, (DC IA 05/27/2010) 105 AFTR 2d."

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/s-corporations-salaries-an-irs-hot-button-issue.html

Asking a good accountant first is the best way to proceed, not all of us amateurs here...since we may have understanding of certain situations but not of all of them.


That is the problem with tax law, the IRS can make it up as it goes. My point remains that you take a minimal salary if any during the year and a bonus when possible. Taxable bonus vs. dividend, well the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is 18 months at Allenwood.
The President is a fink.
April 6th, 2020 at 6:08:15 AM permalink
RonC
Member since: Nov 7, 2012
Threads: 8
Posts: 2501
Quote: AZDuffman
That is the problem with tax law, the IRS can make it up as it goes. My point remains that you take a minimal salary if any during the year and a bonus when possible. Taxable bonus vs. dividend, well the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is 18 months at Allenwood.


You don't take a "minimal" salary, you take a "fair" or 'reasonable" salary (and bonuses, depending on how you do it) that is properly taxed to avoid issues with the IRS. Those "reasonable" numbers are easy enough to find and stay within the rules.
April 6th, 2020 at 6:55:44 AM permalink
AcesAndEights
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 6
Posts: 351
Quote: Gandler
There will be, it has not been released yet.

If you receive your refunds in Direct Deposit, they will automatically use your most recent information unless you contact them otherwise.

If you receive SS it will be deposited in the same account and your SS (possibly with the next payment).

If you received a refund via direct deposit for either of the past 2 years, they will use that same bank info. Hopefully there will be a mechanism for you to provide your DD info if that doesn't cover you. I sure hope so.

One thing that I haven't seen spelled out, yet, is if you paid taxes due via a checking account will they be able to use that info. The way it's phrased, I don't think they will.

I had taxes due for 2019 (already filed), but for 2018 I did receive a refund and that account is still valid. So I'm covered, but if you tend to owe most years (I try, but messed it up in 2018) you may be SOL on the electronic payment.
"You think I'm joking." -EvenBob
April 6th, 2020 at 7:24:47 AM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4492
Quote: AcesAndEights
If you received a refund via direct deposit for either of the past 2 years, they will use that same bank info. Hopefully there will be a mechanism for you to provide your DD info if that doesn't cover you. I sure hope so.

One thing that I haven't seen spelled out, yet, is if you paid taxes due via a checking account will they be able to use that info. The way it's phrased, I don't think they will.

I had taxes due for 2019 (already filed), but for 2018 I did receive a refund and that account is still valid. So I'm covered, but if you tend to owe most years (I try, but messed it up in 2018) you may be SOL on the electronic payment.


The Canadian agency (CRA) made that dead simple for people. For the last week or so if you logged into your bank account remotely you got a pop up. Say yes to the pop up and provide your SIN# and the bank would send your bank account info to the CRA for direct deposit. Canadian payments are going to be $500 / week but you will have to phone in every 4 weeks. Fortunately I don't qualify since I can still work at both my jobs.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
April 6th, 2020 at 9:56:45 AM permalink
Face
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 61
Posts: 3941
Sorry for not paying attention; there's a bit too much demanding attention these days...

I filed my '19 in mid Feb. I assume that means that'll be what's used to judge me? And since I was on comp and had a whopping $7,XXX to claim, that I'm guaranteed on this list to receive "help"?

Do I understand this correctly?
Be bold and risk defeat, or be cautious and encourage it.
April 6th, 2020 at 11:15:44 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 22
Posts: 4170
Quote: RonC
Like anything else, it is complicated:

"However, an S corporation must pay reasonable employee compensation (subject to employment taxes) to a shareholder-employee in return for the services the employee provides before a distribution (not subject to employment taxes) may be given to the shareholder-employee."

"For example, a CPA who incorporated his practice took a $24,000 annual salary from his S corporation and received $220,000 in dividends which were free of employment taxes. The IRS said that his salary was unreasonably low and that $175,000 of the dividends should be treated as wages subject to employment taxes. The court upheld the IRS’s power to recharacterize the dividends as wages subject to employment tax. (Watson v. United States, (DC IA 05/27/2010) 105 AFTR 2d."

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/s-corporations-salaries-an-irs-hot-button-issue.html

Asking a good accountant first is the best way to proceed, not all of us amateurs here...since we may have understanding of certain situations but not of all of them.


We do more... ALL of the distributions are subject to employment taxes, just it is the individual's responsibility to pay them. And of course we have a large accounting firm doing this for us...
April 6th, 2020 at 12:18:53 PM permalink
AcesAndEights
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 6
Posts: 351
Quote: Face
Sorry for not paying attention; there's a bit too much demanding attention these days...

I filed my '19 in mid Feb. I assume that means that'll be what's used to judge me? And since I was on comp and had a whopping $7,XXX to claim, that I'm guaranteed on this list to receive "help"?

Do I understand this correctly?

Yes, as I understand it you should get the full $1200 for yourself and $500 for any children on your return.
"You think I'm joking." -EvenBob
April 11th, 2020 at 3:27:20 PM permalink
petroglyph
Member since: Aug 3, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 6227
Are people receiving checks yet? https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/04/11/trump-labor-secretary-condemned-despicable-efforts-roll-back-unemployment-benefits
The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW