Entertainment should reflect the audience consuming it.

Quote: Gandler

It really just comes down to respect. If somebody asks me to use certain pronouns or wants to be identified in a certain way, I have no issue with it.

In that case please in the future address me as AZDuffman the Great.

Quote: rxwine

“The forbidden scents—experience that smell one more time.” Classic flavors include “Girl Armpit,” “Working Women Stocking,” and (of course) “Schoolgirl’s Urine.” Most of these have been available since 2002.In 2012, the company decided to up the ante on unsettling depravity, releasing “The Smell of a Boy’s Anus” oil.

Weirdly, the US is the number one consumer of these scents.

Some private club in southern FL named “Mar A Lago” orders “The Schoolgirl’s Urine” scent by the caseload.

And orders of the “Scent of a Boy’s Anus” have been known to be delivered to the office of the Senior Senator from South Carolina.

Quote: AZDuffman

Do *I* have to go thru it again?

You were and are among those that think trans women are regular women.

I asked if *YOU* would go with one.

Instead of answering you posted porn as if I would watch something like that.

You never answered, so we know the answer.

Who do you think you are that whatever woman you accept or reject says something about that woman? Same with me. I don't think the fact that I don't prefer women with a butt as wide as a barn says anything about her possible attractiveness. In fact, based on what I see lately, way bigger butts is way more popular than I remember growing up.

You were wrong, Still wrong. And still pretending you had a point.

Quote: rxwine

Who do you think you are that whatever woman you accept or reject says something about that woman? Same with me. I don't think the fact that I don't prefer women with a butt as wide as a barn says anything about her possible attractiveness. In fact, based on what I see lately, way bigger butts is way more popular than I remember growing up.

You were wrong, Still wrong. And still pretending you had a point.

I can't even make sense of whatever this is saying.

Quote: AZDuffman

I can't even make sense of whatever this is saying.

He's saying that personal sexual interest isn't the sole arbiter of another person's value. IOW, preferences are subjective.

Quote: Mission146

He's saying that personal sexual interest isn't the sole arbiter of another person's value. IOW, preferences are subjective.

AZDuffman the Great seems to be unable to get this point after it was described multiple times (or else just wants to not concede it). I also don't understand how sexual preference is in anyway related to your views on others.

There is an endless list of people I like, love, respect, admire, or just find interesting, and 99.99999% I have zero sexual interest in.....
The idea that you need to be sexually attracted to somebody to value them in any other capacity is just such a strange point to make.....

Quote: Mission146

He's saying that personal sexual interest isn't the sole arbiter of another person's value. IOW, preferences are subjective.

Then why does he just say he would not have sex with a transgender? Could it be because he realizes once he does then his claim that they are "no different" falls right apart?

Quote: AZDuffman

Then why does he just say he would not have sex with a transgender? Could it be because he realizes once he does then his claim that they are "no different" falls right apart?

Perhaps he could hypothesize a scenario by which he would have sex with, "A transgender," and doesn't want to say so. I can't speak for him. I also don't think anyone has a right to demand to know anyone else's sexual preferences or proclivities.

Quote: Mission146

Perhaps he could hypothesize a scenario by which he would have sex with, "A transgender," and doesn't want to say so. I can't speak for him. I also don't think anyone has a right to demand to know anyone else's sexual preferences or proclivities.

I did not ask broad preferences. What I did is more like the foot massage talk in "Pulp Fiction" where Jules says that that giving a foot massage to a woman is nothing for her husband to be upset about and it is an innocent thing. So Vincent says, "Would you give a guy a foot massage?"

Jules realizes he is in the wrong but will not admit it, just tells Vincent "eff u" and will not talk about it. So on this board several people said it was no big deal for transgenders to use the ladies room or change with the girls. They were adamant that "it did not matter." So I asked, "would you have sex with a transgender?" Most hemmed and hawed, but all but one said, "no." They hemmed because they were repulsed by the thought. But they admitted they would not.

Except for one who just posted a link to a porn site. And on a PG site not a thing was said by management. Suspensions given for far less. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.

Quote: AZDuffman

I did not ask broad preferences. What I did is more like the foot massage talk in "Pulp Fiction" where Jules says that that giving a foot massage to a woman is nothing for her husband to be upset about and it is an innocent thing. So Vincent says, "Would you give a guy a foot massage?"

Jules realizes he is in the wrong but will not admit it, just tells Vincent "eff u" and will not talk about it. So on this board several people said it was no big deal for transgenders to use the ladies room or change with the girls. They were adamant that "it did not matter." So I asked, "would you have sex with a transgender?" Most hemmed and hawed, but all but one said, "no." They hemmed because they were repulsed by the thought. But they admitted they would not.

Except for one who just posted a link to a porn site. And on a PG site not a thing was said by management. Suspensions given for far less. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.

That's my entire point: You can't automatically make any inferences by the fact that someone refuses to answer the question because that is equivalent to demanding the answer from them.

Personally, I think the mere act of nudity is overly sexualized in most contexts, so I'm not opposed to having only one changing room, or what have you, but I would stipulate that there should be a separate room for families/children. As far as adults go, I wouldn't see a big deal with just one changing room.

Same with restrooms just make them all gender-neutral and have a family restroom in public places. That is, unless there's only one stall/toilet, then just have a locking door and anybody can use it.

I've never seen Pulp Fiction, so I don't get the reference. It seems like you described the scene well-enough.