SCOTUS Vacancy
October 27th, 2020 at 12:00:16 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
And NOBODY is taking them away. Every single election you Dems fall for the same lie that those pesky Repubs are going to cancel ALL your rights and you never notice that it never happens. Pathetic. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 27th, 2020 at 12:12:09 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
Thanks to the three Trump appointments the average age of SCOTUS at next inauguration is 64.2 which is 7.7 years younger than the average age when FDR reached his 2nd inaugurated. ------------------- ------------------ Mar 4, 1937 80.3 Brandeis 13. Nov. 1856 77.9 Van Devanter 17. Apr. 1859 75.1 McReynolds 3. Feb. 1862 74.9 Sutherland 25. Mar. 1862 74.9 Hughes 11. Apr. 1862 71.0 Butler 17. Mar. 1866 66.8 Cardozo 24. May. 1870 64.4 Stone 11. Oct. 1872 61.8 O. Roberts 2. May. 1875 71.9 ------------------ ------------------ Jan 20, 2021 82.4 Stephen Breyer 15. Aug. 1938 -- Bill Clinton 72.6 Clarence Thomas 23. Jun. 1948 - George H. Bush 70.8 Samuel Alito 1. Apr. 1950 - George W. Bush 66.6 Sonia Sotomayor 25. Jun. 1954 66.0 John Roberts 27. Jan. 1955 60.7 Elena Kagan 28. Apr. 1960 55.9 Brett Kavanaugh 12. Feb. 1965 53.4 Neil Gorsuch 29. Aug. 1967 49.0 Amy Coney Barrett 28. Jan. 1972 64.2 FDR proposed to reorganize the federal judiciary by adding a new justice each time a justice reached age 70 and failed to retire. That was 6 judges when he began his second term. If Biden proposed to reorganize the federal judiciary along similar terms he could add only three at first. |
October 27th, 2020 at 12:24:17 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18204 |
He has me blocked. Ask him why he hates "religious nuts" but is OK with "abortion nuts." The President is a fink. |
October 27th, 2020 at 1:06:34 PM permalink | |
ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12511 |
I’ll answer: Because “religious nuts” are crazy and there’s no such thing as an “abortion nut” (only anti-abortion nuts.) “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
October 27th, 2020 at 1:07:23 PM permalink | |
kenarman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 14 Posts: 4494 |
We might as well do away with courts if that is the case. Just hold a referendum on ever court challenge. Basically laws don't matter under your scenerio just public opinion which is always fickle and changing with the wind. "but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin |
October 27th, 2020 at 1:37:48 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 | If Republicans had let Obama choose a 3rd judge to replace Scalia, then it would have been 30 months with 2 Clinton appointees and 3 Obama appointees. But Trump's two appointees would shift it back to a conservative majority. Feb 13, 2016 Antonin Scalia (Died) Jul 31, 2018 Anthony Kennedy (Retired) Sep 18, 2020 Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Died) But Republicans insisted on waiting 14 months after Scalia died (until April 7, 2017). |
October 27th, 2020 at 3:00:43 PM permalink | |
DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 51 Posts: 4963 |
Many people call me an abortion nut. I believe abortions should be required for all cases unless the parents can prove they can both afford the child and pass parenting aptitude tests. At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent. |
October 27th, 2020 at 3:03:31 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18204 |
That level is not even needed. Demanding abortion be legal up until birth or that the government fund it would qualify one as an "abortion nut." Most members of NOW are abortion nuts. The President is a fink. |
October 27th, 2020 at 3:08:15 PM permalink | |
SOOPOO Member since: Feb 19, 2014 Threads: 22 Posts: 4170 |
That was basically my point. I think there are ways to get a constitutional amendment which will override the SC. It is not inconceivable that pro abortion people have the numbers to do so.... probably will have enough votes in 10 years.... |
October 27th, 2020 at 4:33:24 PM permalink | |
Tanko Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 1978 | There may be changes in Roe V Wade, but it will not be overturned. Even if it was overturned, abortion will reman legal in nineteen states. |