January 6 redux

Page 3 of 32<123456>Last »
January 3rd, 2022 at 11:17:34 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18209
Quote: missedhervee
A very telling admission there, BTW.

While not really surprising, it is a damn shame that you now admit / clarify that you advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.

What, did you flunk your Civics course in school?


A little revolution every now and then is a good thing!
The President is a fink.
January 3rd, 2022 at 11:20:07 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18209
Quote: gamerfreak
Why would you follow liberal standards if you despise them?


Because that is the standard. Liberals hate when conservatives follow their standards. Like when they defended Clinton's behavior all his term as his "personal life" then when they tried to call out Trump and we told them it was his personal life. Limbaugh was correct when he said the only way to get liberal behavior to change is use their own standards against them.
The President is a fink.
January 3rd, 2022 at 11:45:34 AM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 27
Posts: 4256
Quote: AZDuffman
Where have you been? It is left wing extremism that is driving most riots in the USA. Left wingers took over several city blocks, not just a building. Left wingers in the 1960s regularly took over government buildings.

It was no big deal, get on with your life.


It was a huge deal. This is the first time the capital has been invaded by a force since 1812 when the British assaulted and occupied the Capital Buildings, this just does not happen in America.

But, you have to remember most domestic terrorism is right-wing terrorism.

"Between 1994 and 2020, there were 893 terrorist attacks and plots in the United States. Overall, right-wing terrorists perpetrated the majority—57 percent—of all attacks and plots during this period, compared to 25 percent committed by left-wing terrorists, 15 percent by religious terrorists, 3 percent by ethnonationalists, and 0.7 percent by terrorists with other motives."
https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states

(Its worth pointing out that the "religious terrorists" can be considered right wing for all intents and purposes, as well as most ethnonationalists, so it really is more like 70ish%, and those attacks are almost always worst -as far as damage and actual causalities- ) People consider it "left wing terrorism" when some vegan extremists -"eco-terrorists"- burns down a chicken factory and there are no injuries, right wing terrorism usually involves death and/or bodily injuries (you can look at the FBI data if you don't believe me).

So yeah, its far more logical to be concerned with right wing terrorism.
Sovereign Citizens are another group I consider right wing. In fact, I consider most anarchist groups right wing.

Its not the 1960s, so even if that were true, its totally irrelevant.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States

https://sgp.fas.org/crs/terror/R44921.pdf


https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism/news
(a good resource to scroll through recent terrorism related arrests/charges and see current trends in real time).
January 3rd, 2022 at 11:47:19 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 96
Posts: 3099
Quote: AZDuffman
A little revolution every now and then is a good thing!


There is no such thing as "a little revolution."

Hello, sedition.
January 3rd, 2022 at 11:56:43 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18762
Quote: AZDuffman
Because that is the standard. Liberals hate when conservatives follow their standards. Like when they defended Clinton's behavior all his term as his "personal life" then when they tried to call out Trump and we told them it was his personal life. Limbaugh was correct when he said the only way to get liberal behavior to change is use their own standards against them.


No, we pointed out it's not a crime to have an affair. Perjury however is a crime. And if I listen to today's conservatives, it's only a "process" crime when it comes to Trump.

Liberal and conservative doctors would have told Limbaugh to quit smoking. You must follow health advice from such individuals like Limbaugh.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:00:26 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18762
Also, when it comes to sex, conservatives are often way holier than thou on the subject. So their screwups in that area are way more entertaining.

Even if the pee tape exists, we know it's worthless for prosecutorial purposes, which we know all along.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:06:35 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18209
Quote: rxwine
No, we pointed out it's not a crime to have an affair. Perjury however is a crime. And if I listen to today's conservatives, it's only a "process" crime when it comes to Trump.

Liberal and conservative doctors would have told Limbaugh to quit smoking. You must follow health advice from such individuals like Limbaugh.


Sexual harassment if not a crime is usually a fireable offense. As to perjury, Trump has not committed it as far as I can see.

What Limbaugh's smoking has to do with anything I have no idea.
The President is a fink.
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:07:10 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18209
Quote: missedhervee
There is no such thing as "a little revolution."

Hello, sedition.


So you are saying to say that is seditious?
The President is a fink.
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:14:52 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18762
Quote: AZDuffman
Sexual harassment if not a crime is usually a fireable offense. As to perjury, Trump has not committed it as far as I can see.

What Limbaugh's smoking has to do with anything I have no idea.


No indication that was relevant.

Quote:
One of the key components of a sexual harassment case that a plaintiff needs to prove is that sexual or romantic advances by a supervisor were not welcome. In other words, the employee must demonstrate that she was not interested in the relationship. Instead, the employee must show that she felt threatened or uneasy and that the workplace became hostile because of the advances.


Also, there was no indication at the time, that Monica felt she might be fired for not having sex, or any other threat. And she was an adult.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:19:55 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18209
Quote: rxwine
No indication that was relevant.



Also, there was no indication at the time, that Monica felt she might be fired for not having sex, or any other threat. And she was an adult.


Learn about sexual harassment. A boss having sex in the office would certainly constitute a hostile environment. Liberals ignore this when it comes to Clinton.
The President is a fink.
Page 3 of 32<123456>Last »