What Movies Have You Seen Lately?
October 18th, 2017 at 12:31:52 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18761 | I am glad the screenwriter(who is also the director) of LA LA Land rejected the initial pressure to change the film and got a later offer.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
October 18th, 2017 at 10:39:49 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Having Gosling as a rock musician would have ruined it. The whole movie had a laid back jazz theme, it was the movie. Gosling took months of piano lessons just to learn how to look like he was really playing. Fooled me, I was convinced he really was playing, he was that good. Emma Stone can do more real acting with her huge blue eyes than most actresses can manage with their whole bodies. She was crazy good in this movie. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 19th, 2017 at 7:15:55 AM permalink | |
Mosca Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 22 Posts: 730 |
Wow, Bob, very interesting! You are thoughtful regarding film, and often blunt in your assessment, especially when you pan a movie, so for you to give such praise is a strong recommendation for La La Land!
Absolutely. The whole idea is that Sebastian is a bit of an oddball with a vision that runs against mainstream tastes. If he was a rock musician, the party scene where he plays in the party band would have been meaningless; instead, it is shown as demeaning to him. And being a pure jazz musician sets up his character as principled to a fault, and consequently portrays his tour with Keith as a sellout, no matter how successful it was. I didn't like La La Land as much as you (and many others) did. I enjoyed it, but it didn't blow me away. I just wasn't engaged in the characters. Many scenes seemed contrived to me, especially the defining argument. And, in the one scene where Sebastian and Mia were looking at each other, I thought, "Man. One of Emma Stone's eyes is as big as BOTH of Ryan Gosling's eyes together." On the other hand, both my wife and daughter loved it. As did many millions of others. And it is a really good looking film. So there's that. |
October 19th, 2017 at 7:22:09 AM permalink | |
Mosca Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 22 Posts: 730 | We saw Wind River last week, it is excellent, a worthwhile use of your entertainment budget. Not as good as Hell or High Water (same writer, Taylor Sheridan, also wrote Sicario), but similar. Wind River was also directed by Sheridan, so it feels more of a piece. Great showdown scene, very realistic. |
October 19th, 2017 at 11:13:16 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
You have to really suspend disbelief when seeing a musical. It's a different form of communication, you have to look at the message the writer and director are going for. This was done in such an understated way, with so much class. They could have had huge numbers with dozens of Gay dancers in tight pants, but there was none of that. Gosling and Stone did their own singing and dancing. It gave the movie a personal feel, one you don't get with polished professionals. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 19th, 2017 at 1:02:05 PM permalink | |
Mosca Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 22 Posts: 730 |
I enjoy musicals very much. And one of the things I liked about La La Land was the way the cinematography paid homage to the great musicals of the '50s, Singin' in the Rain specifically with the color palettes and scene framings. And remember, I did enjoy it. I just didn't connect with it the same way many people did. Maybe I saw it on an off day for me, I don't know. |
October 19th, 2017 at 1:18:05 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
The music was glorious. It constantly set the tone, be it jazz or classical. Some critics called it brilliant, and a masterpiece. I totally agree. I loved seeing the Griffith Observatory. It's been used as a movie set since it opened in 1935. It was used in 3 of the Terminator movies, and even Buffy the Vampire Slayer. It costs $10K a day to film there now, so they make the best use of it they can. Here's the long list of what it's been used in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffith_Observatory#Filming_location If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 19th, 2017 at 1:57:31 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18761 |
If someone missed the 1 minute alternate reality scene at the end, they would miss 50% of the poignant point of the movie. IMO. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
October 19th, 2017 at 2:02:35 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
It had to take them half as long to film that epilogue as it did to film the whole movie. There is so much crammed into it, and every scene required a total set up and who knows how much time. It reminded me of when Sonny and Cher were on Letterman in 1997 and they sang I've Got You Babe for the first time in 20 years. They should have stayed together, they still loved one another and were perfect together. When Cher gave his eulogy she said it was the hardest thing she'd ever done. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 19th, 2017 at 2:16:09 PM permalink | |
petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | I was never more disgusted with the papparazzi, than when I saw what they did to Cher during that eulogy. They had to zoom in on the tears streaming down her face, and her bawling in terrible grief. No one needed to view that in such detail. Some things deserve to be private. The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |