Original Sin?
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:21:28 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
1) Agigantism is the certain denial that there are giants. This is illogical and doesn't make sense and I believe it carries with it a burden of proof. 2) Since there are, literally, thousands of gods other than yours, please show absolute and certain proof these others do not exist. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:22:24 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Do you know what he had to say about such comments? ;) Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:24:32 PM permalink | |
Dalex64 Member since: Mar 8, 2014 Threads: 3 Posts: 3687 |
I used to challenge it, but he wouldn't listen, and continues to use illogical and fallacious arguments. I have given up on him. He almost baited me into a reply by stating that logic and reason is evidence, but I decided again not to say anything. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:37:13 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Jaywalking, yes. A murder where no weapon is found, no motive, and the defendant has an ironclad alibi that he was 50 miles away at the time, you have no case no matter what the witnesses say.
Too bad you have none of that. Miracles are a joke and easily debunked, historical facts of the divinity of Jesus are the worst kind of 'game of telephone' hearsay. Archeology? You could have the actual cross and the actual tomb the body was in, it proves nothing other than he was crucified and entombed. Real historical and the Church's historical 'facts' are very different things. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:41:06 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
No Christian ever wants to discuss this. If their god exists, all other gods must exist also. They never see the logic in that. It hurts their head, they will fix a look on you like you've lost your mind. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:41:40 PM permalink | |
Face Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 61 Posts: 3941 |
But that's where you lose me, because it is not at all what you are saying over and over. I mean, yes, I do see you say that over and over, but it also comes with the entire heap of other nonsense along with it. How'd it begin? I can't know. Perhaps some day long after I'm gone someone will discover something plausible, but I neither hope to see it, nor would I believe it is the answer as it's too complicated to be answered by a simple discovery. THAT is the lone contention in my atheism, what seems to be little more than pedantry. I don't claim there is no root cause, and I cannot wrap my head around the infinite so cannot with integrity state myself "it's always been here". I fully accept the possibility of a god IF AND ONLY IF we use the definition to mean what I posted above. A root cause, an origin. Why I do not accept the term agnostic is because I do not for a minute believe it was any form of conscious, purposeful action engaged in by an intelligent being of any sort. THAT is where I feel we stray from philosophy and go directly to some form of mental illness. Not necessarily "devoid of reality" mental illness, but the base kind that inhabits every single human that has ever existed. You know, emotion. Ego. Self indulgence. That is the only thing I can see in any of the myriad posts you've made on the topic. It just completely boggles. For what it's worth, I feel the same way about militant atheists. For every whackadoo Bible banger losing their s#$% over the lord, there is an overbearing atheist playing the exact same game. It's the two sides of the same coin thing I see plenty of in this Left v Right BS in politics, and don't think I consider them "my people". It's all emotion overtaking good sense, and it's despicable in all it's forms. I can't "prove" atheism. I'm sure you've heard why you can't prove a negative, and I have neither the intellect or the equipment to look back to the beginning of time. But I can test what's been offered, and it all falls flat (although the whole "talking trees" thing a la Moses is possible with enough LSD or brain trauma). But from burying food to nourish the lost on their journey to the Sky World to reciting incantations for healing and health, every single religious proclamation falls flat. The only thing that has ever given me what the god folk claims is there, is other people. Why? What does that tell me? There are no gods, nor a God. What you refer to as God, it's nothing more than YOU. Be bold and risk defeat, or be cautious and encourage it. |
May 2nd, 2017 at 1:57:12 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Here we go for the hundredth time. Negatives can't be proven. You're the one making the claim, the burden of evidence is all on you to show evidence of a god.
You set up the boundaries, claim everyone in the science community agrees with them, and then proclaim your truth: God exists. You're talking about a theory, one of many. The universe has been here forever, it had no start and has no end. Our small part of it, the BB, has happened an infinite number of times. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
May 2nd, 2017 at 2:32:59 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
What is illogical about it? I am an agigantist, they are not necessary beings and the evidence of their existence should be seen. God, or as we are really discussing here a force or being that is the cause of all existence, is necessary and the evidence is existence and motion itself.
I can't be as certain that these gods don't exist in the same way that I can be certain a God exists. If you want to debunk a religion or demonstrate it is not true you need to appeal to history, philosophy, its effects in the human person, how it helps us understand ourselves and live in society, etc. These arguments can lead to faith in a certain religion and exclude the rest but again it cannot lead to the same strength of conclusion there is that a God exists. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
May 2nd, 2017 at 2:33:32 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Yes, really the book and his proposal are quite ridiculous and reviewed as such. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
May 2nd, 2017 at 2:36:32 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Oh dear Lord,...what is illogical about saying that for there to be anything there had to be a cause?!? Logic IS evidence in that you can know things for certain through it. If a rock hits you on the head then something acted on that rock, you don't have any evidence to reach that conclusion but you have the evident logic. Same thing with A cannot equal not-A. I don't even have to tell you what A is but you know with absolute certainty the truth of such a statement. This is what I mean when I say logic is evidence. Please for the love of God tell me how I have not listened to you and how anything I have said above is illogical. I really need to know. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |