Gender sport records.

Quote: AZDuffman

See ting is I do not care about them whatever they are. If you want to try to make a point you can explain. But thin is all these tranny ideas are to science what “People” magazine is to journalism.

Not sure what your broken AC had to do with anything.

Quote: AZDuffman

See ting is I do not care about them whatever they are. If you want to try to make a point you can explain. But thin is all these tranny ideas are to science what “People” magazine is to journalism.

You're spending an aweful lot of time yapping about a subject and people you don't care about...

Quote: AZDuffman

Better yet leave it the same and tell people they have to compete in their actual gender. Gender is binary you have to be one of the other. Unless you ignore science that is.

This subject matter is exponentially more complicated than you realize. We're not talking about pronouns or having sex-reassignment surgery. We're talking about how to categorize different babies at birth and whether the category should still apply 2 decades later when they compete in sports.

If a baby is born with a vagina, fallopian tubes, ovaries and uterus, is that a baby girl?

What if the baby is born with a vagina, and fallopian tubes, but the baby was born with no ovaries and no uterus, is it still a baby girl?

What if the baby is born with a vagina, fallopian tubes, and uterus, but instead of ovaries, it was born with undeveloped testes in the location where the ovaries would normally be, is that still a baby girl?

Castor Semenya was born with a vagina. But she was born with no uterus. Do you think she should be allowed to compete against women? Or are you arguing that even though she was born with a vagina you think it's more appropriate for her to compete against men because she was born with no uterus?