War on coal

Page 3 of 6<123456>
December 3rd, 2016 at 10:51:00 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: Pacomartin
A return to coal for central heat is nasty and dirty and means you have to go back to shoveling coal in your basement. It is not likely to catch on.

But as a practical matter the use of 90% of coal for electricity generation is probably not going to change. I don't know if President Trump is advocating the building of new coal fired generation plants, or just a reduction of the rate of closure of old ones.


I'm not suggesting it for most individual homes, too inefficient for smaller units. Too long to heat up and too hard to regulate. Though I have wondered about rocket mass heaters, you can heat them up with your junk mail and the provide a good base heat for a long time, so I have heard so far.

But for electricity, coal is great. Might even keep finding more uses for the by-products.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
December 3rd, 2016 at 11:30:37 AM permalink
pew
Member since: Jan 8, 2013
Threads: 4
Posts: 1232
It''''''s funny that back in the seventies (under Pres. Carter ah-hem) Popular Science magazine had articles every month about efficient or cleaner coal, solar, wind and all kinds of different and innovative technologies that would continually improve and by the next century....... Well it''''''s 2016 and no flying cars and solar panel efficiency still stinks and still costs way too much. Oh well, maybe next century.
December 3rd, 2016 at 12:00:49 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: pew
It''''''s funny that back in the seventies (under Pres. Carter ah-hem) Popular Science magazine had articles every month about efficient or cleaner coal, solar, wind and all kinds of different and innovative technologies that would continually improve and by the next century....... Well it''''''s 2016 and no flying cars and solar panel efficiency still stinks and still costs way too much. Oh well, maybe next century.


On YouTube there is the 1978 AFC Championship Game with full commercials. One for solar power says it is decades away. For large scale still is.

STRATFOR suggests current solar tech is a youthful fling and it will be practical only when we figure out Tessa's (guy not car) theory of transmitting power thru the atmosphere.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
December 3rd, 2016 at 12:36:16 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: AZDuffman
On YouTube there is the 1978 AFC Championship Game with full commercials. One for solar power says it is decades away. For large scale still is.

STRATFOR suggests current solar tech is a youthful fling and it will be practical only when we figure out Tessa's (guy not car) theory of transmitting power thru the atmosphere.


Quote: Wikipedia

Using a Peltier electrometer, Luigi Palmieri researched atmospheric electricity.

Nikola Tesla and Hermann Plauson investigated the production of energy and power via atmospheric electricity.[21][22] Tesla also proposed to use the atmospheric electrical circuit to transceive wireless energy over large distances.

The Polish Polar Station, Hornsund, has researched the magnitude of the Earth's electric field and recorded its vertical component.

Discoveries about the electrification of the atmosphere via sensitive electrical instruments and ideas on how the Earth’s negative charge is maintained were developed mainly in the 20th century.

Whilst a certain amount of observational work has been done in the branches of atmospheric electricity, the science has not developed to a considerable extent.

Up to the contemporary day, apparatus which extract industrial energy from atmospheric electricity have not been built and maintained.


Atmospheric electricity utilization for the chemical reaction in which water is separated into oxygen and hydrogen. Vion, U.S. Patent 28,793, "Improved method of using atmospheric electricity ('Electric Apparatus')", June 1860.
December 3rd, 2016 at 12:45:12 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: Pacomartin

But you can save a lot of money by turning central heat down to about 60 degrees to protect you pipes. Space heaters are better at heating a zone of a home, and not the entire house.
.


I have the temp at 62 in the winter. I spend
most of the time in my office, so I use an
oil heater and keep it about 70 in here.
Small room, easy to do. Upstairs it's warmer
because heat rises. It's 62 downstairs and about
72 upstairs. I don't mind the rest of the house
at 62 because I'm always dressed and moving
in those areas, it's comfortable.

This is what I use in the office, best space heater
there is. The oil inside heats up and stays hot
with very little power. I keep it on almost the
lowest setting there is and it stays 70 in here.
This room has no heat, the vent is closed. If
I turn the heater off and forget to turn it on for
overnight, and it's 0 degree's out, it will be 40
in here. So keeping it at 70 when it's 0 outside
is quite a feat, considering it's on almost the
lowest setting.

If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 3rd, 2016 at 2:36:21 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Quote: Evenbob
I have the temp at 62 in the winter. I spend
most of the time in my office, so I use an
oil heater and keep it about 70 in here.
Small room, easy to do. Upstairs it's warmer
because heat rises. It's 62 downstairs and about
72 upstairs. I don't mind the rest of the house
at 62 because I'm always dressed and moving
in those areas, it's comfortable.

This is what I use in the office, best space heater
there is. The oil inside heats up and stays hot
with very little power. I keep it on almost the
lowest setting there is and it stays 70 in here.
This room has no heat, the vent is closed. If
I turn the heater off and forget to turn it on for
overnight, and it's 0 degree's out, it will be 40
in here. So keeping it at 70 when it's 0 outside
is quite a feat, considering it's on almost the
lowest setting.


There is nothing wrong with your oil filled electric heater EB but it is not significantly more efficient. All electric heaters are 100% efficient at converting electricity into heat. What additional efficiency there might be in your heater is because the oil evens out the temperature swings between heat on and heat off which usually is a little more efficient. The same reason a better thermostat on central heating can be more efficient. Despite all the hype by various manufacturers and their products electric heaters are all within a percentage or 2 in efficiency, its called physics. If it plugs into a regular wall outlet a heaters maximum output is 1500 watts.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
December 3rd, 2016 at 3:00:29 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: kenarman


There is nothing wrong with your oil filled electric heater EB but it is not significantly more efficient. .


I've used all kinds of heaters and the
oil heater is more efficient because
it keeps giving off heat when the
it clicks off. Other electric heaters stop
giving off heat immediately. The oil
heater is always working whether it's
on or off.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 3rd, 2016 at 3:16:00 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Quote: Evenbob
I've used all kinds of heaters and the
oil heater is more efficient because
it keeps giving off heat when the
it clicks off. Other electric heaters stop
giving off heat immediately. The oil
heater is always working whether it's
on or off.


The residual heat in the oil didn't come from nothing it came from the electricity when it was on. The heat from a normal radiant heater heats the furniture and other things in the room. They radiate this heat back into the room as they cool when the heater is off. As a said in my original post its physics can't get something from nothing.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
December 3rd, 2016 at 3:53:17 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: kenarman
The heat from a normal radiant heater heats the furniture and other things in the room. They radiate this heat back into the room as they cool when the heater is off. .


What kind of radiant heater are you
using, I never had one that heated
squat, except air right around it.
When it shut off the room started
to cool immediately. With the oil
heater it cools much slower because
the hot oil keeps pumping out heat
long after it shuts off.

"Where radiant heaters struggle is any place where you want to move around comfortably in the same area. Because their heat is so focused, radiant heaters can't warm anything outside their field of view and because electromagnetic waves spread out as they travel from their source, you have to be physically close to the heater in order to feel its heat. All of which makes them an excellent way to heat one or two individuals, but very bad at heating rooms. Their heat's just too confined. Convection heaters (oil) heat enclosed spaces very well, allowing you to move about without feeling cold or chilly. They take longer to warm you up, but they're what you need if you want a constant, long-term heating solution."
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 3rd, 2016 at 5:30:20 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: kenarman
The residual heat in the oil didn't come from nothing it came from the electricity when it was on. The heat from a normal radiant heater heats the furniture and other things in the room. They radiate this heat back into the room as they cool when the heater is off. As a said in my original post its physics can't get something from nothing.


I have always regarded the oil heaters as more cost effective simply because they had 600W, 900W, 1500W settings, and you could opt to run them on a lower setting. They may not be more efficient in a true heat exchange equation, but sometimes you feel warmer on a 600W setting if it is a foot away. Also with oil heaters you are not as easily burned.

Older traditional space heaters only had one setting (1500 Watts) and you relied on the thermostat to shut them down. So even if you put them near your chair, they still don't shut down until the air in the room reaches a certain temperature.

But newer ceramic heaters have a high setting (1500W) and a lower wattage setting (exact wattage not specified).
Page 3 of 6<123456>