The Trump Impeachment Thread

June 14th, 2017 at 6:52:19 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Wizard
As much as I'd like to see that happen, I will happily bet it doesn't. There doesn't seem to be enough here to warrant it.


Presidents John Tyler and Andrew Johnson faced constant threats of impeachment largely because they were remarkably unpopular. The House tried but failed three times to impeach Tyler for having done nothing more than protect the president's authorities to veto legislation and nominate officials. Even though Johnson came within a single vote of being convicted in the Senate, most historians have dismissed his impeachment as driven more by partisanship than a proper basis for impeachment and removal.


In the unlikely event that Democrats capture the House in 2018, they may not need a reason.
June 15th, 2017 at 5:52:33 AM permalink
RonC
Member since: Nov 7, 2012
Threads: 9
Posts: 2582
Quote: ams288
HUGE BREAKING NEWS from the Washington Post

Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

Go ahead, Donald: fire Mueller. Dig that grave.


It could be true, of course...but mostly it is more of the "officials said" stuff the Post is using everyday.

I would not be surprised if they look into everyone to see if any obstruction occurred; isn't that kind of the idea?

Of course, Mueller's probe does not start or stop at Trump...there are people on both sides that could have issues.
June 15th, 2017 at 6:57:35 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: RonC
It could be true, .


Donald's tweets this morning calling it a witch hunt seem to confirm that it's true.
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
June 15th, 2017 at 7:32:03 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
You know, when poor people end up in jail for things like carrying a straw and a soda can in a paper bag (drug paraphernalia), or walking alone at night (prostitution), or get killed by police for selling loose cigarettes, I wouldn't lose any sleep if a corrupt rich white guy loses his job due to a reasonable interpretation of the statutes.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
June 15th, 2017 at 7:34:28 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
It was a brilliant "leak," letting it be known that Mueller is investigating Donald for obstruction.

Now if he tries to do anything to get rid of Mueller, it will be (obstruction of justice)^2 and even the righties will have a hard time denying that.
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
June 15th, 2017 at 8:14:28 AM permalink
Dalex64
Member since: Mar 8, 2014
Threads: 3
Posts: 3687
Quote: ams288
It was a brilliant "leak," letting it be known that Mueller is investigating Donald for obstruction.

Now if he tries to do anything to get rid of Mueller, it will be (obstruction of justice)^2 and even the righties will have a hard time denying that.


That's what I thought when I first heard about it - that releasing that information was intended to make it more difficult to fire the guy. They very well may have kept it under wraps if the rumors about Trump firing him didn't come out.

Someone mentioned that theory on an interview today, too.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan
June 15th, 2017 at 11:13:06 AM permalink
RonC
Member since: Nov 7, 2012
Threads: 9
Posts: 2582
I said this incorrectly before, so I am editing it...

That someone is being investigated means very little unless evidence of an actual illegal action is found. Trump being "under investigation"does not prove anything. I thought we long ago decided that there actually had to be something done that was wrong for being investigated to matter. Once an allegation, indictment, article of impeachment, etc. comes out, then it means something...but even then, it still unproven until it goes to court or Congress.

Innocent until proven guilty. Not guilty because the media says so or someone leaks that they think he may be guilty...when an anonymous person leaks something, you have to look at their motivation for doing so.

The media is playing games by trying to make the story whatever they want it to be.

We're being played. The media wants to try this in the court of public opinion, not in the Congress.
June 15th, 2017 at 12:05:56 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: RonC
I don't think any of us have any idea who is being investigated.


Donald. Donald is being investigated for obstruction of justice.

We know this.

The WH has not denied it. Donald has not denied it. Donald's lawyers have not denied it.
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
June 15th, 2017 at 12:19:23 PM permalink
terapined
Member since: Aug 6, 2014
Threads: 76
Posts: 12501
Quote: RonC
I don't think any of us have any idea who is being investigated.

Huh?
Speak for yourself
Pretty obvious its Trump
Sometimes we live no particular way but our own - Grateful Dead "Eyes of the World"
June 15th, 2017 at 12:19:52 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: RonC
I don't think any of us have any idea who is being investigated.


The old saying is they could be investigating
a ham sandwich, it means nothing until they
find something.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.