The Trump Impeachment Thread

Can any righties identify anything in the whistleblower complaint that turned out to be wrong?

I can’t understand why y’all are so angry with him when his information was spot on. Oh wait, yeah I can. lol

Quote: kenarman

"Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election." Sounds like a totally unbiased informant to me. He was also involved in Hillary's campaign and was one of main inventors of the Russian collusion theory.

Yes and also:

-"He was accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump,” said a former NSC official,..."

"Also, Ciaramella huddled for “guidance” with the staff of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, including former colleagues also held over from the Obama era whom Schiff’s office had recently recruited from the NSC."

"And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,”

Quote: ams288

Can any righties identify anything in the whistleblower complaint that turned out to be wrong?

"Google is your friend"

P.S. I will wait until you can answer my earlier question to you about identifying the section of the US Constitution that you previously claimed President Trump violated.

Thought so.

His report was spot on. It wouldn’t matter if George Soros was the whistleblower, the actions identified in the report are the textbook example of “impeachable.” And Donny has already basically admitted to all of it!

I would hope anyone leftover from the Bush administration would have reported Obama under a whistle blower act if it was necessary and not be a traitor to the United States of America by acting with blind loyalty to a President.

Quote: kenarman

And by the way, the name of the whistle-blower is Eric Ciaramella.

"Federal documents reveal that the 33-year-old Ciaramella, a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election." Sounds like a totally unbiased informant to me. He was also involved in Hillary's campaign and was one of main inventors of the Russian collusion theory.

Quote: rxwine

I would hope anyone leftover from the Bush administration would have reported Obama under a whistle blower act if it was necessary and not be a traitor to the United States of America by acting with blind loyalty to a President.

I totally agree
We are also fighting for our future
We need a whistleblower so if the next Dem President pulls the same crap as Trump, the whistle is blown. It could be a Trump admin holdover. Doesn't matter. What matters is the complaint itself, not the whistleblower itself.

Quote: terapined

No you don't get it
I want a serious investigation
Not some clown show where everybody is playing for the cameras
Serious investigations are conducted without live tv cameras
The evidence will be made public and you can contest it at that time

That isn't what is happening now, but yet you seem happy with the way it is being conducted.

I am okay with behind closed doors, no news coming out, no opening statements, etc. as long as everyone is bound by the same rules. It doesn't have to be fair even; grand juries aren't really fair...hence the old saying about indicting a ham sandwich. Do the investigation and report out with the findings of the investigation, including the minority report.

This has not been that. I assume we will continue to disagree.

I would rather have open hearings, of course. I think they could get to the same place and EVERYONE would see it for themselves.

I'm not sure the resolution changes much. I have read it. It may open it up but they have to have chair approval to actually do much.

I’m sorry, but does he not realize how unintentionally hilarious this is?

“I know mine wouldn’t.”



Edit: meant to post this in the “implosion” thread. Too many tr*mp threads!

Quote: ams288

I’m sorry, but does he not realize how unintentionally hilarious this is?

“I know mine wouldn’t.”



Edit: meant to post this in the “implosion” thread. Too many tr*mp threads!

That is pretty funny