Biden's Biggest Blunder

I saw some pundit complain that the afghans ran because we would no longer supply all the air cover. Well, they're fighting a force that also has no air cover. And the Afghan army had superior weapons and number of individuals. Just more unnecessary whining.

Same thing with the unvaccinated at this point. They're told and told and told; they're given chance after chance after chance. At this point, I only care that they don't F... up our hospital system overcrowding it for the people who got vaccinated and just need regular procedures and typical emergencies.

Quote: rxwine

Same thing with the unvaccinated at this point. They're told and told and told; they're given chance after chance after chance. At this point, I only care that they don't F... up our hospital system overcrowding it for the people who got vaccinated and just need regular procedures and typical emergencies.

Here is what you do not get. The unvaccinated do not care what you think about them. We have made our choice for our bodies (sound familiar?) Now, you say that you do not care, but clearly you do as you keep bringing it up.

You keep saying, "I DID AS I WAS TOLD, WHY DO YOU NOT DO THE SAME?" Compliance is your virtue, freedom is ours.

Now I cannot wait as it is Friday, VFW poker night. Leaving the house unvaccinated and no mask!

Quote: Gandler

Quote: fleaswatter

My goodness.
Supposedly, you are somewhat in the military. Did you ever hear the acronym RTFM (read the f----ing manual). It appears not.

I quote you: Its routine (generally required) for the State dept to charge for services.

It is NOT "generally required", it is required by law to charge but, as I said before, it appears that the fees/charge may be waived depending upon circumstances.

You are arguing over semantic to twist something to make it look like a Biden thing. As you said it's standard and has been..... And, they are exempting citizens this time. It's causing outrage over something that should not in a troubling scenario.

You have got to be kidding me..

You continue to NOT GET IT. It is not now, nor has been ever, in any of my posts about “semantics”. It is about reading the rules and regulations AS WRITTEN without any interpretation.

The law states that the U.S. government will NOT pay for evacuation if it is needed for private U.S. citizens or third country nationals. There are NO semantics here. There is no statement that says that it is "generally required" for the State dept to charge evacuation services. Just because the Secretary of State has the ability to waive the fee/charge, this does NOT change the underlying law.

I say 2+2=4
You seem to say 2+2 is “generally” 4

I also do not understand where I am “twisting” anything to make it look like a dementia joe bidumb thing. YOU are the one who brought dementia joe bidumb into the conversation.

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: Gandler

Quote: fleaswatter

My goodness.
Supposedly, you are somewhat in the military. Did you ever hear the acronym RTFM (read the f----ing manual). It appears not.

I quote you: Its routine (generally required) for the State dept to charge for services.

It is NOT "generally required", it is required by law to charge but, as I said before, it appears that the fees/charge may be waived depending upon circumstances.

You are arguing over semantic to twist something to make it look like a Biden thing. As you said it's standard and has been..... And, they are exempting citizens this time. It's causing outrage over something that should not in a troubling scenario.

You have got to be kidding me..

You continue to NOT GET IT. It is not now, nor has been ever, in any of my posts about “semantics”. It is about reading the rules and regulations AS WRITTEN without any interpretation.

The law states that the U.S. government will NOT pay for evacuation if it is needed for private U.S. citizens or third country nationals. There are NO semantics here. There is no statement that says that it is "generally required" for the State dept to charge evacuation services. Just because the Secretary of State has the ability to waive the fee/charge, this does NOT change the underlying law.

I say 2+2=4
You seem to say 2+2 is “generally” 4

I also do not understand where I am “twisting” anything to make it look like a dementia joe bidumb thing. YOU are the one who brought dementia joe bidumb into the conversation.

You are correct that was poor wording on my part (though I think it was clear what I meant).

In any case, lets put this issue aside for now until we see how it plays out, I think we have both said all that needs to be said on this topic until more is released.

Have a good evening.

Quote: AZDuffman

Here is what you do not get. The unvaccinated do not care what you think about them.

Why would I ask for your opinion on this? Try to figure it out before you respond.

All the people coming out of the woodwork now in the military, politicians on both sides, foreign correspondents, foreign analysts, all saying they told Beijing Joe and the Crime family Administration for weeks and months this exact thing was going to happen that is happening in Afghanistan and Beijing Joe's response is, nobody told me nothin man. Just saw a military guy who says he told senile Joe to his face not to do this and Beijing Joe's response was, don't worry about it I'm doing it my way. Now I'm hearing impeachment everywhere I look. At least Harris, as incompetent and stupid as she is, does not owe her heart and soul to a foreign government like Beijing Joe does.

Quote: rxwine

Why would I ask for your opinion on this? Try to figure it out before you respond.

So you are upset somebody called you on your rant?

LOL. OMG, I'm going to leave because someone challenged my response for the first time EVER HERE!

Could you come up with a more stupid response, Duffman. Not sure you could.

Quote: rxwine

Could you come up with a more stupid response, Duffman. Not sure you could.

He could mention his views on pedophiles.