Trump 2025

The Constitution said nothing about abortion, did it?

No,but it talked about liberty and freedom.

You say that freedom does not mean being allowed to do anything you want.

I'd say yes it does, so long as your choices do not harm other existing lives in being.

Again, times change, and morals evolve, especially now that most folks realize religion is a superfluous mind fuck.

White House slams "unelected" officials. GOODBYE

Quote: AZDuffman

So you equate pregnancy with slavery?

I don’t see any legal connection. And that sounds kind of anti-woman and sick.

Far-left folks don't recognize a growing unborn baby as a person, so they justify the unborn baby is not a person covered by the Constitution.

That's one reason we need to be careful when selecting folks that interpret the Constitution and for hiring personal attorneys.


Clearly, all unborn persons are covered by the Constitution, if their parents are "legal" citizens.


These far-left folks discard the person being killed, like the person never was protected.

Convenient to be able to justify to do what one wants.


It's one reason our legal system is such a mess and corrupt.

The worst attorneys are the far-left lawmakers.

And why folks don't care for politicians.

Quote: missedhervee

The Constitution said nothing about abortion, did it?

No,but it talked about liberty and freedom.

You say that freedom does not mean being allowed to do anything you want.

I'd say yes it does, so long as your choices do not harm other existing lives in being.

Again, times change, and morals evolve, especially now that most folks realize religion is a superfluous mind fuck.

So killing an existing life is not harming it?

Quote: AZDuffman

So killing an existing life is not harming it?

We don’t have to kill them. We can do it your way. Just remove them and give to you or the state to take care of. It’s likely more cruel than killing, but if that’s what you want.

I mean they’re going to die taken out at an early age, but this should be allowed. You can legally give children up.

If a man can’t be forced to provide blood and oxygen via their own body to the “baby” it’s definitely not fair that women should have to do so against her will.

Quote: AZDuffman

So killing an existing life is not harming it?

An unborn child through about the second tri-mester is not an existing life.

One could argue that there is no existing life until birth.

One thing I find so damned funny about the MAGgots position on abortion is that it will cause untold scores of them to have to pay child support for spawn conceived after a one night stand when their beer goggles said "Go for it."

Pay the pussy tariff...bwa ha ha ha

Quote: missedhervee

An unborn child through about the second tri-mester is not an existing life.

One could argue that there is no existing life until birth.

Sorry, but science says otherwise. At fertilization a unique DNA is assigned. That means it is a new life then and there.

Quote: rxwine

If a man can’t be forced to provide blood and oxygen via their own body to the “baby” it’s definitely not fair that women should have to do so against her will.

I understand that you do not know the difference between men and women, but this is a new level of stupid.

You also sound like a feminist here. And that kind of statement again proves why men should not date feminists. There is simply no logic to it.

Unless she is raped, it is not against her will. Birth control is out there.

Quote: AZDuffman

Sorry, but science says otherwise. At fertilization a unique DNA is assigned. That means it is a new life then and there.

Of course it is a form of life, but then again so is a cancerous polyp.

The kicker is sentience, self-awareness, the ability to think.