Original Sin?
| March 22nd, 2014 at 11:54:39 AM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
No no no, you can't approach it that way, with logic. You have to approach it with science and observation. It's obvious the universe isn't here for moral reasons, that's just absurd. The single biggest problem the Spanish monks had when they got to Calif for the first time, was convincing the natives they were born in sin. It was a completely intellectual concept and there was no way to prove it. To the natives it sounded preposterous, but the priests were so adamant that they went along with it till the priests left. As soon as they were gone, they reverted to their old ways. Original sin is snake oil at it's worst, a hard sell unless you can get to the non believers early, which is what the priests ended up doing. Getting to the children and indoctrinating them when they were toddlers. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 4:38:07 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | It is not really that hard to convince or prove to anyone that they are sinful. What is hard to convince people of is that they are not meant to stay that way. Original sin is the concept that we have inherited a weakness in humanity (again not a personal sin so you can't really say "born in sin") but that this weakness is not who we are. Original sin points to our original perfection! This is not a hard sell to anyone, especially adults who feel both the burden of their sins and the desire in their hearts to be better. The fact that the native people of the Americas, especially Central and South America, did not abandon this comforting and compassionate idea the priests were so passionate about is found in the strength of the Church throughout Latin America. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 4:51:47 PM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 241 Posts: 6108 |
If this original sin contaminates everybody, then wouldn't Jesus then also not be perfect? If you say that his case is an exception, because the Virgin Mary was sinless, then I would ask the question question about her. Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 6:26:15 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | One of the big trivia questions for Catholics or anyone is what does the Immaculate Conception refer to? Quite a few people always say that it refers to Jesus's conception. However, the Immaculate Conception is meant to precisely answer this good question you pose. Obviously Jesus, being God is not born with original sin. Mary however is a different case. In order to prepare a perfect vessel for Jesus to dwell and enter into this world she received something called preveniant (sp?) grace. This basically means that she was able to experience at her conception the freedom from original sin that God will bring about through Jesus. She got the preview or I should say the advance screening of Jesus' sacrifice so that she could be preserved from sin and be the worthy womb to carry Our Lord. I think this is better explained by the title of Mary as the New Eve and Jesus as the New Adam. Eve remember was created without original sin and so was Adam. Eve came from Adam's body. So now the tape is basically playing in reverse: an immaculate conceived (meaning free from original sin) woman brings forth from her body a new Adam who instead of ushering in sin and death this new Adam, Jesus, brings freedom and life eternal. It is a return to the Garden of Eden and a new way for us to return there as well. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 6:37:50 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
The fact that you have to concoct all this trivial nonsense to explain something that's made up to begin with, shows what an utter canard it is. If you don't have somebody tell you that there is original sin, you would have no way of knowing it. It can't be proven, isn't obvious, isn't detectable in any way either by deduction or logic or science. It was made up entirely to sell a religion. Why this isn't obvious to most religious people is the real Great Mystery. You choose to wear a millstone around your necks that is pure fantasy. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 6:44:14 PM permalink | |
| Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
It should be noted that the Immaculate Conception is Catholic dogma. The formal pronouncement of Mary's Immaculate Conception by the Catholic Church was in 1854, 1) Anglicanism: Belief in Mary's immaculate conception is not a doctrine within Anglicanism, although it is shared by many Anglo-Catholics. 2) Eastern and Oriental Orthodox say that Mary was without sin for her entire life, but they object to the dogmatic declaration of her immaculate conception. 3) Martin Luther, who initiated the Protestant Reformation, said: "Mary is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin. God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil." But in 1532 he denied Mary's immaculate conception, declaring: "Mary is conceived in sin just like us." However, some Lutherans, such as the members of the Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church, support the doctrine. 4) Most Protestants reject the doctrine because the Immaculate Conception is not taught in the Bible. |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 6:49:04 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
It gets confusing when you have to make up the rules for something that doesn't exist. It turns into a circus, which it's been from the start. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 7:08:15 PM permalink | |
| Wizard Administrator Member since: Oct 23, 2012 Threads: 241 Posts: 6108 |
Gracias, padre! I also thought the Immaculate Conception referred to Jesus' conception. Now I have a trivia question for Catholics. If they disagree with me then I'll send them your way. If I may change the topic a bit, in the name of humor, they were joking on a radio show I like (Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me) about how the Pope recently used the Italian equivalent of the F word, accidentally of course. They couldn't say the F word on the radio so they said what he said was "The Immaculate Conception without the Immaculate part." Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 7:32:03 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | That's pretty funny - now I wish I could understand what the Immaculate Conception minus the Immaculate part Evenbob is talking about in some of these posts - can't you censor him or something? :-) Just kidding Bob I know you by now and luv ya. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| March 22nd, 2014 at 7:38:58 PM permalink | |
| Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | Between the trinity, the immaculate conception and the original sin, I'm convinced George Orwell modeled Double-Think on Christian writings. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |

