Neo-monophysitism
December 21st, 2015 at 2:05:55 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
NOT JOB!!! The idiot who wrote the story! The ego centered moron who invented a god who has nothing better to do than sit around and worry about his pitiful creation. The ego worship of the Yahweh religions is breathtaking to behold. A god who creates an intricate universe, all so he can be worshiped by the creatures he created. It's a child's story, it's a story created by ignorant nomads who made it up around the campfire at night. It's insulting to the intelligence of an informed person. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 22nd, 2015 at 6:48:24 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
So Jehovah is very interested in how Job will handle being tortured, but this is not about Job.
Just what is his place? Unquestioning obedience? It seems Jehovah doesn't like people who try to learn or understand anything past what they're told.
"You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means." Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 22nd, 2015 at 9:52:27 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
It is about how Job handles the inevitable suffering that we all face in life to in the end grow in his faith in God. I think this much is clear.
His place, like all of us, is to recognize that there is a God and we are not Him. That we are creatures given extraordinary gifts and free will so that we may return the love of God and share love with others. Now before you say I don't know what that word means again (great movie quote by the way), maybe you should say what you think love is so we can try to figure out where we differ. Isn't the entire book of Job about us trying to figure out the mystery of suffering? God desires us to use one of the greatest gifts He has given us - our intellect to wrestle with mystery of life and figure out this amazing world and universe we have all around us. "You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means." “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 22nd, 2015 at 11:51:55 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Yes, but you keep doing the doublethink: it's all about Job, but Job isn't important enough for all to be about him.
The second part is entirely correct. One cannot be that which does not exist.
That's a very hard term to define with even a fair degree of precision. What love is not, is flattery and ass-kissing out of fear of the consequences. That's what prayers read like. If you've ever read historical documents from ancient times, you'll notice a lot of this. Particularly the use of different honorifics for the same person, abject obsequiousness from supplicants, etc. This was because a noble, and more so a prince or a king, was legally above the supplicant. More importantly, such people had few or no limits to their behavior. A noble could punish a commoner without thought of consequences. That's how most believers treat their gods. As powerful beings who might lash out at any time, for any reason, and we'd better crawl before them and mollify them, or else. You can talk about "love" all you want, but the practice of religion belies the notion,
Did you not read the opening passages? There is as much mystery as in a Scooby Doo cartoon. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 22nd, 2015 at 8:21:52 PM permalink | |
petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | Language is a tool, and the word love serve's the same function as stripes on a tiger. It is camouflage, and for much the same reason. The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
December 22nd, 2015 at 8:32:07 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
Very good point. Loving god is impossible, you can't love something that doesn't exist. For us to love someone, or some creature, they have to have lovable characteristics. My dog is friendly and cute and always happy to do what I want to do. He's lovable. I love him. My cats are cute and entertaining, I love them. God, the invented Christian god, has no loving traits at all. My wife will say she loves him because he sent Jesus. That's like saying you love the mailman because he brought you a package you wanted. God promises punishment if you don't do as he says, he promises punishment forever if he's not obeyed. This is not a lovable trait. God is not cute, he's not fun, he's not a good companion, mostly because he doesn't exist at all. The last thing he would be if he did exist is lovable. People fear god, so they pretend to love him, hoping god won't notice they are scared to death of their image of him. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 22nd, 2015 at 10:31:45 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I would agree about what you say love is not. Back to what love is: I do think love is recognizing the truth of a person and honoring and respecting them, not our of fear or the consequences, but because it is what they deserve. Contrary to your crazy belief there is indeed an all-powerful, all-knowing, loving God who has become one of us in the person of Jesus Christ to show us the way to live and to free us from our sins so that we may live forever in Heaven. What you see as flattery is rather recognition of a truth about who God is and a rightful loving and honoring of Him, for the pure reason that is what He deserves. You might not believe that and maybe you have experiences that have shown you that those who believe in God do not represent Him very well. You might believe like Job's friends that you have gotten a raw deal and that if there is a God one should at best ignore Him and at worst curse Him and die. I recognize that, but let's not get it twisted here, the love I have for God is real and is not based on flattery, or fear, or because I have somehow been blessed by Him with a great life (because I haven't). What Evenbob seems to equate love to in one of his recent posts is feelings. You can't love something you can't see. You can't love something not there like a dog to lick your face. Well, you can love something very real but not visible. You can receive great comfort from something greater than and idea that gives you real hope and helps make life more meaningful and with purpose. Most important you can love the truth and the truth is that there is a God who loves you, Bob, me and all of us. I'm sorry if you can't feel it or understand it, but believe me it is very, very real. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 22nd, 2015 at 10:57:52 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
Yes, you can love an idea, people do it every day. They love the idea of getting thinner, of quitting smoking, of finding a soulmate, of their child getting into a great college. You can also love the idea of a loving god, even though he isn't real. That's what you do every day, it gives you strength and keeps you going. I don't need that, you do. Each to his own.
It's real for you, don't be sorry it's not real for me or other atheists. Be happy it's real for you. You keep it real by the constant reinforcement you give it. It's seems real, so to you it is real. The fact that you have to make it real for everybody is what's bothersome. And in some Yahweh religions, very dangerous. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 23rd, 2015 at 6:32:05 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
The attitude of people in prayer is submission, like a dog wagging her tail and showing her throat and belly. That's not love. Dogs will submit to any dominant being, be it other dogs or people, but they're very particular with their affections. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 23rd, 2015 at 8:24:14 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Is your fatalistic view of life your own or the one favored by the church? If Jehovah were real we'd have to fight him and kill him. Lester del Rey actually wrote a story along those lines, only the fight is against aliens backed by "god." Nice idea, but underexecuted in typical del Rey fashion: long buildup, small payoff. If you want to look it up, it's called "For I Am A Jealous People." Really, try to comprehend this: there is no such thing as "God." So any choices involving a god are as realistic as deciding whether to obtain Jedi training or attend Starfleet Academy. If the story of Job were real, or even realistic, then I could ignore not just the opening, but all passages involving Jehovah, in particular his put-down of the protagonist near the end. Then his friends should be figuring out how best to help him, if possible, and offer support. Rather than wonder why Jehovah is mad at him. Why do we suffer? Because we leave ourselves open to it. We form bonds of love and friendship in an uncertain, largely unpredictable universe that is indifferent to our existence. Our lives are of indeterminate but finite duration. We will all die, someday. We have no guarantees as to how our lives will play out, how will the lives of our friends and family will play out. We are vulnerable to disease, accident, malice and more. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |