Calexit

Page 12 of 13« First<910111213>
Poll
5 votes (55.55%)
2 votes (22.22%)
No votes (0%)
1 vote (11.11%)
1 vote (11.11%)

9 members have voted

January 16th, 2018 at 5:15:07 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 136
Posts: 20412
Quote: boymimbo

Never is going to happen.


Could have said the same thing about the Baltic Republics in 1980.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
January 17th, 2018 at 2:51:37 AM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
Quote: Nareed
Right wing paranoid fantasies are every bit as weird as other conspiracy theories. I tend to ignore them,
Good.


>>>>>>>>>Or the flip side: FDR arranged the attack on Pearl Harbor.
he didn't arrange it though but for his being crippled he surely turned cartwheels.
He did not want some minor gunboat incident, he wanted a first move by the Japs, Pearl Harbor was a hardship post due to lack of shore facilities, he relieved of command the admiral who protested putting the fleet in Hawaii rather than San Diego, he kept the oldest admiral in command at Pearl and kept the diplomatic decrypts away from those who most needed them. World Report had a Dec seventh issue entitled Peace in the Pacific but world shipping companies already knew and US consular offices already knew the Japanese merchant fleet was marching across the Pacific to the safety of the home waters.
October 29th, 2019 at 7:04:03 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 136
Posts: 20412
Trudeau victory prompts ‘Wexit’ talk in Canada’s West

Quebec in the east, oil regions in the west. Not unlike the USA, Canada seems to be a couple ultra-liberal areas out of step with the rest of the nation.

In centuries past, this kind of thing would simply cause a civil war or else that part of the country would break off. Since the late 1800s and far more since the end of WWI, this does not happen much, the breakup of the USSR excepted. Wexit and Calexit are not the only 2 places. It really might be time for the UN to recognize processes for this to happen peaceful before it comes to violence.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
October 29th, 2019 at 7:23:55 AM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 28
Posts: 4667
Quote: AZDuffman
Trudeau victory prompts ‘Wexit’ talk in Canada’s West

Quebec in the east, oil regions in the west. Not unlike the USA, Canada seems to be a couple ultra-liberal areas out of step with the rest of the nation.

In centuries past, this kind of thing would simply cause a civil war or else that part of the country would break off. Since the late 1800s and far more since the end of WWI, this does not happen much, the breakup of the USSR excepted. Wexit and Calexit are not the only 2 places. It really might be time for the UN to recognize processes for this to happen peaceful before it comes to violence.


Never going to happen there or here. People love to talk about it. But, this is what caused the Civil War in the past.
October 29th, 2019 at 7:43:02 AM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Under the lefties criteria I should have a Conservative government in Canada since they won the popular vote but ended up with fewer seats. Oh the travesty of it, all maybe we can impeach Trudeau.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
October 29th, 2019 at 8:03:33 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 136
Posts: 20412
Quote: Gandler


Never going to happen there or here. People love to talk about it. But, this is what caused the Civil War in the past.


I would not be so quick to dismiss it. Look at how fast the USSR fell apart, as well as Yugoslavia. The former with little violence, the later with much. Eventually old borders make no sense and new ones should come about.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
October 29th, 2019 at 9:23:06 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Gandler
Never going to happen there or here. People love to talk about it. But, this is what caused the Civil War in the past.


Canada never had the unifying experience of the Revolutionary War. Canada is much more a business arrangement than the USA and provinces have more power than states. A breakup of Canada would be very civil without any bloodshed.

Western Canada has only been part of the nation for less than 150 years
Manitoba established as a province of Canada in 1870.
British Columbia agreed to join Canadian confederation in 1871.
Saskatchewan: Established as province in 1905.
Alberta: In 1905, the same year as Saskatchewan, Alberta also was established as province.

The states that entered USA during the same time period were:
Colorado 1876
North Dakota 1889
South Dakota 1889
Washington 1889
Montana 1889
Wyoming 1890
Idaho 1890
Utah 1896
...
Oklahoma 1907
Arizona 1912
New Mexico 1912
Alaska 1959
Hawaii 1959
May 23rd, 2024 at 10:39:33 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 203
Posts: 21597
Saw a story yesterday, on the “Greater Idaho” movement. Part of Oregoners Oreganos?, want to move the state line 200 miles west and become part of Idaho.

Personally, I think all of Oregon should vote on it. For instance if a state a has rich resource in one part of the state, why should it give that up just because the people in that area want to take, say a tax advantage for instance in the next state over. We could certainly benefit and impoverish many areas working on the premise of people voting themselves over the state line, instead of the usual method of just selling and moving.

Anyway state lines have been moved before. Apparently Congress has final approval.
Only real derangment going on is people who still believe in Trump
May 23rd, 2024 at 1:42:31 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 136
Posts: 20412
Quote: rxwine
Saw a story yesterday, on the “Greater Idaho” movement. Part of Oregoners Oreganos?, want to move the state line 200 miles west and become part of Idaho.

Personally, I think all of Oregon should vote on it. For instance if a state a has rich resource in one part of the state, why should it give that up just because the people in that area want to take, say a tax advantage for instance in the next state over. We could certainly benefit and impoverish many areas working on the premise of people voting themselves over the state line, instead of the usual method of just selling and moving.

Anyway state lines have been moved before. Apparently Congress has final approval.


This movement has been going on a few years, the official one not just the idea. More than 5 less than 10 probably. Some counties in northern CA want to get in on it.

I do not agree on all of the state voting on it. I mean, they can. But the ones who want to leave should not be stopped. I agree that a secession movement cannot leave the rest of the place unviable. That is not the case here.

Truth is many lines need to be redrawn. I think it is in Atlanta that some areas have recently left. Cries of "racism" but they want to go their own way so should be allowed. NY has had an upstate/downstate divide forever. I would do a major redraw cut NY off at the Tap, cut Philly and the counties north of it off from PA. Merge all that with NJ and merge the western parts together. Pittsburgh and Buffalo have more common interest with each other than with Philly and NYC. Put the Yuppers with WI. Probably lots of others.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
August 9th, 2024 at 6:56:46 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 203
Posts: 21597
Quote:
Texas Nationalist Movement leader Daniel Miller said the United States has a "deep-seated sickness," which means there is a chance "it either blows up or it invites autocratic reign from some tyrannical government." The warning was delivered in the most recent episode of his Texas News Podcast released on Wednesday.

Miller was speaking in response to comments Phil McGraw, better known as "Dr. Phil," made when the pair debated Texan independence on his Dr. Phil Primetime show, which was broadcast in late July.

Texan nationalists have scored a series of victories in recent months amid ongoing tensions between local authorities and the federal government, particularly over illegal immigration and LGBTQ+ rights. In May the Republican Party of Texas elected supporters of a referendum on Texan independence as its new chair and vice chair, then the following month included an independence referendum call in its 2024 Legislative Priorities and Platform document.
During the concluding monologue at the end of his show on state secession, McGraw expressed skepticism about the prospect of any state successfully leaving the Union.

"The chances of seceding successfully, with a functional government, infrastructure, medical and educational facilities etc., to me, is just beyond belief," he said. "Does anybody believe the new country will not be plagued by the same selfish whiney complaining career victims that will squawk even louder for any reason or no reason at all?"

Miller hit back at McGraw: "While he publicly came out and essentially condemned what we're talking about, talking about, 'oh it's going to be too difficult, you'll have problems and it doesn't solve anything.' He gave no real proof, but more than that his solution was essentially for 400 million Americans to wake up tomorrow and observe the golden rule.

"He suggested that 400 million Americans could set aside their differences and work harmoniously overnight, and I've got to tell you, this idea is not only unrealistic, perhaps delusional, but it's also very, very dangerous."

Describing the tensions he believes exist in American society Miller added: "You see when you have such a deep-seated sickness, this pressure internally, these competing world views, these deep-seated issues and you ignore them. It is a recipe for disaster.

"One of two things happens. It either blows up or it invites autocratic reign from some tyrannical government to keep its hand on those competing realities. That's the danger in thinking one day everybody's going to wake up and we're going to link pinkies and sing Kumbaya. It's just not the reality. The reality is Texans are suffering."

Speaking to Newsweek, Miller argued a peaceful breakup of the United States is the only way to avoid "American Balkanization."

He said: "When you have people with vastly different political, cultural and economic worldviews that are being forced into the false reality of being 'one people' living under a single system of centralized governance, those differences can create explosive political pressure.

"The United States has been on this path for decades, and we recognize this. This is why we have pursued TEXIT and worked for Texas and all other states to have this conversation about states withdrawing from the union. A peaceful political separation is the only way to avoid the inevitable calamity of an American Balkanization."

Newsweek contacted Phil McGraw for comment via an email to his company Merit Street Media.

A survey conducted for Newsweek earlier this year found that in a hypothetical independence referendum, 23 percent of Texans would back secession, against 67 percent who would vote to remain "a state within the United States."



Which countries dominate the Earth. Large countries. US, China, Russia. People who want this obviously don't know they can be lapdogs to other larger countries sooner or later. Even strong small countries are highly dependent on resources outside their borders.
Only real derangment going on is people who still believe in Trump
Page 12 of 13« First<910111213>