What Movies Have You Seen Lately?

July 1st, 2016 at 3:19:31 PM permalink
Ayecarumba
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 89
Posts: 1744
Quote: rxwine
"No Way Out" (with Kevin Costner, Gene Hackman) was the best trickster plot movie I ever saw. But not sure how it holds up now

Quote:
The film was very well received by critics and as of December 4, 2015, holds a 90% "Fresh" rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 40 reviews.[3]

Roger Ebert gave the film 4 out of 4 stars, calling it "truly labyrinthine and ingenious."[4] Richard Schickel of Time wrote, "Viewers who arrive at the movie five minutes late and leave five minutes early will avoid the setup and payoff for the preposterous twist ... Desson Thomson of The Washington Post wrote, "The film makes such good use of Washington and builds suspense so well that it transcends a plot bordering on ridiculous."[6]


If you go searching about on the Internet for information before seeing it, you'll probably find spoilers. I wouldn't recommend it if you want to see it.

But okay here.
lol, OBVIOUSLY, you can't be trusted!!


If you're bothered by ancient computering stuff, this is in 1987. Not 2016.


I enjoyed "No Way Out", and would also recommend it. As for twisty plots, two classics come to mind for me:

"Psycho" - Alfred Hitchcock's classic.


and Bryan Singer's "The Usual Suspects"
July 1st, 2016 at 4:45:03 PM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6376
I take the spoiler thing pretty seriously, and, yes there are old to extemely old movies I haven't seen.

There are some movies I refuse to discuss with people who have not seen them.
I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
July 1st, 2016 at 5:48:00 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: odiousgambit
I take the spoiler thing pretty seriously, .


And I take it seriously not at all.
It's a freaking movie, what do I
care knowing how it ends. Tell
me the end to every movie I've
never seen, I don't care. In fact,
I frequently will stop a movie
half way thru, go to wiki and see
how it ends, just to see if I want to sit
thru the last half. Many times I do
not and go watch something else.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
July 1st, 2016 at 5:54:23 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Don't watch this clip if you care about hearing a spoiler for "Homeland" season #3.
July 1st, 2016 at 6:04:09 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: Pacomartin
Don't watch this clip if you care about hearing a spoiler for "Homeland"


Don't worry. What's Homeland, never heard
of it. I don't watch TV, just Nflix. I see a series
that's been on for 8 seasons called Royal Pains
is on Nflix. Never heard of it till yesterday.
Watched the first 3 ep's and when I was thru
dry heaving from the terrible acting, the stupid
stories, and the ridiculous fairy tale story line,
I marveled that it was on 8 seasons. When I
saw Henry Winkler was a semi regular in season
2, the worst actor of all time, I tried to hang
myself in the shower but I'm too tall. I got
over it eventually and drank myself to sleep.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
July 1st, 2016 at 9:09:15 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Evenbob
Don't worry. What's Homeland, never heard of it. I don't watch TV, just Nflix.


Showtime is a premium cable and satellite television network a subsidiary of CBS Corporation, which since July 1, 1976 has been a poor cousin of Home Box Office (launched November 8, 1972). Homeland is an American version of an Israeli television series about prisoners of war that come home, but are now suspected terrorists having been converted during their captivity.


Clair Danes has the starring role as the mentally troubled CIA analyst that figure out the the heroic American may be a terrorist.

Standard TV business practices in place for half a century had studios were willing to lose money on a series initially in hopes the show would grow into a smash hit and get resold as repeats to local stations and cable networks.

"Homeland" was one of the first of the new economics in television. It costs about $3-$4 million an episode to make but averaged fewer than 2 million viewers in its initial airings. The idea is that quality shows will pay back with hefty dollars from emerging platforms (either streaming or digital sales).

Netflix paid Lionsgate Entertainment — which makes "Mad Men" — at least $75 million to stream all seven seasons of the series. That amounts to $1 million per episode.
July 1st, 2016 at 10:08:24 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Back to the Future is on Nflix again. This
time I was looking for product placement.
My god, Spielberg left no stone unturned
in signing up sponsors. I lost count at 40,
Pepsi being the stand out. If you really look,
products are placed everywhere, right down
to the stopwatch used by Doc being made
by Citizen.

The story brings up the time travel problem
again. When Marty goes home to 1985,
everything is different at his house. His
parents and siblings are not the same at
all. He has no memory of being raised
by these different people, no memory
of getting a new truck. So where is the
Marty who was raised by them. You can't
have the old Marty and the new Marty
exist at the same time in one body, so
it's another nail in the coffin of time
travel.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
July 2nd, 2016 at 4:43:53 AM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6376
Bob, you taught us one way to get over having watched a bad movie is to review the "hated it" ones at imdb. I almost forgot to do this. This one may be the best for 'Gladiator'

Quote:


A Movie for the Toilet Bowl
1/10
Author: Steve (SECurtisTX@yahoo.com) from Dallas
30 March 2004

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This movie is the very epitome of what I hate about movies. The Hollywood-ization/bastardization of what could have been a great movie. The FX and action were great, the characterization was adequate, the plot was dumb, and the ending was abysmal. Why doesn't anyone in Hollywood have the courage to take a movie where it ought to go instead of where the test audiences say it should go?

This is a gladiator movie. You know what that means? It was set during the Roman Empire. During the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and his son Commodus. It was NOT a fantasy. When you set a movie during a historical time frame, there are certain rules you have to abide by. One of those is, you do not rewrite history on a grand scale. The main reason to set a movie within a historical context is to give it plausibility. You do not then crap on that plausibility by having the characters do things that would have caused all of history to lumber down a different path.

In Braveheart, William Wallace did not rally the Scots, defeat the English, march into London, kill the king of England in a duel, and establish a democracy. Why? Because that isn't what happened; and it would have turned a great movie into a crappy movie. In Dances With Wolves, John Dunbar does not rally the Sioux nation in a war to conquer the United States, kill Ulysses S. Grant in a duel, and establish a new form of government in Washington based on Sioux practices. Why? Because that isn't what happened; and it would have turned a great movie into a crappy movie. In Gangs of New York, Leo DiCaprio's character did not face Abe Lincoln in an arena, kill him, and establish a new form of government in Washington where the Irish were the ruling class. Why? Because that isn't what happened; and it would have turned a mediocre movie into a crappy movie.

***SPOILER ALERT!!!***

So in Gladiator, an exiled Roman general kills the Emperor in the arena and in so doing allows the reestablishment of the Roman Republic in 182 A.D. You know what? It didn't happen that way, and it turned a great movie into a crappy movie. The makers of this movie took all the plausibility of setting and trashed it. They took a pretty good historical action movie and turned it into a suck-ass fantasy. And the better the movie is before the movie-makers pull their pants down and squat over it, the more I resent the dump being taken on it. And that's the case here.



I would say, though, that what happens in the movie after Commodus is killed is not clearly the establishment of a Republic. Any viewer would reasonably expect so, but they don't show it [not even these bastardizers could live with such a joke I guess]. I don't think it is shown, anyway: once Commodus announced he was going into the ring with Maximus I fast-forwarded through it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0172495/reviews?filter=hate
I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
July 2nd, 2016 at 6:36:05 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22938
Quote:
Why doesn't anyone in Hollywood have the courage to take a movie where it ought to go instead of where the test audiences say it should go?



Money I guess. Historically accurate, but audiences won't go see it is a problem.
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
July 3rd, 2016 at 2:51:00 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Box Office: Steven Spielberg Has Disastrous Opening With “The BFG”

I said awhile back this would be a dog,
I couldn't even watch all of the trailer.
It looked like an awful movie.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.