The Election Fraud Thread

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

You must live in some upside-down world.

Show outcome determination fraud or STFU about it.

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

What damage was done? From what I can tell the system worked perfectly and this is an example of security and investigation.

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

What damage was done? From what I can tell the system worked perfectly and this is an example of security and investigation.

Using Duffman's same logic, Trump's border security would be a failure because if anyone is stopped that is still a failure.

Quote: rxwine

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

What damage was done? From what I can tell the system worked perfectly and this is an example of security and investigation.

Using Duffman's same logic, Trump's border security would be a failure because if anyone is stopped that is still a failure.

In such a case people being stopped would be a success. But I see where you are confused.


The lefties on here keep insisting elections do not need more security yet example after example has been posted.

Meanwhile they insist voter ID will keep people from voting but cannot find one example

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: rxwine

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

What damage was done? From what I can tell the system worked perfectly and this is an example of security and investigation.

Using Duffman's same logic, Trump's border security would be a failure because if anyone is stopped that is still a failure.

In such a case people being stopped would be a success. But I see where you are confused.


The lefties on here keep insisting elections do not need more security yet example after example has been posted.

Meanwhile they insist voter ID will keep people from voting but cannot find one example

Trying to fix what’s not broken is all you’re doing. You just make yourself useless.

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: rxwine

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illinois-official-charged-allegedly-submitting-dead-mothers-mail-ballot

Quote:

Elections
Illinois official charged after allegedly submitting dead mother’s mail-in ballot

So the ballot was almost instantly caught, the violator arrested, and the vote not processed?

Sounds like a pretty secure system to me.

If after the election is “instantly “ in your book then maybe.

Where I come from it shows mail in voting is fraud prone.

What damage was done? From what I can tell the system worked perfectly and this is an example of security and investigation.

Using Duffman's same logic, Trump's border security would be a failure because if anyone is stopped that is still a failure.

In such a case people being stopped would be a success. But I see where you are confused.


The lefties on here keep insisting elections do not need more security yet example after example has been posted.

Meanwhile they insist voter ID will keep people from voting but cannot find one example

Well, we are aware of the 1 in about 27,000 votes being fraudulent, and call that secure. Because it is

So I issue this challenge to AZDuffman, SooPoo and all others: What is the target threshold of voter fraud you wish to achieve with your voter ID laws?

Examples of people being excluded from voting:

A law in Kansas, which required proof of citizenship for state and federal elections, was found in 2018 to violate both the U.S. Constitution and the National Voter Registration Act after it prevented more than 31,000 citizens from registering to vote. Arizona established a two-tiered system after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that the state could not require citizenship documentation for federal elections. Texas voting officials are finding citizens being incorrectly flagged as non-citizens when checking the SAVE database.

Quote: GenoDRPh

So I issue this challenge to AZDuffman, SooPoo and all others: What is the target threshold of voter fraud you wish to achieve with your voter ID laws?

No matter how little fraud there may be I still want Voter ID. Because it causes no inconvenience and keeps things secure. It has been proven over and over and over that you need ID for any number of things, so why should voting be any different?

You can't take someone seriously who supports the biggest potential threat to voter security, the all too willing cheater himself, President Trump.

Quote: AZDuffman

No matter how little fraud there may be I still want Voter ID. Because it causes no inconvenience and keeps things secure. It has been proven over and over and over that you need ID for any number of things, so why should voting be any different?

We vote by mail, and at the time we register we must supply either our driver's license number or our social security number.

Quote: missedhervee

We vote by mail, and at the time we register we must supply either our driver's license number or our social security number.

Of course everyone knows that only US citizens can obtain a driver's license or a social security number. /s/