In The News Today...

Thread Rating:

January 30th, 2018 at 3:31:59 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: beachbumbabs
The FBI isn't corrupted.


That they let Hillary off for her email server is proof enough they have taken side or/and are owned. A common employee would be fired and likely have faced prison for what she did.

Your outrage is very selective.

Quote:
Who's the corrupt party again?


Let me guess, you are saying it is the one you claim membership?
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
January 30th, 2018 at 4:47:20 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5753
Quote: boymimbo
Come on man, you're better than that.

How many years did the right squeal about Benghazi and is still wanting to lock up Hillary 14 months after the election?
The right has most of radio through Clear Channel, Rush, Hannity, etc. People generally now get their news from the sources they want and like to build their own reality based on what they like to hear anyway.
The left (NYT, Post, etc) have not had many stories misproven. Even in Trump's "fakeys", all of the stories were retracted if incorrect. I don't see the right doing that.
The right was the I hate Obama even when his policies proved to be good for the USA and will never admit it party (still waiting for "repeal ObamaCare" to happen".

As for CNN and the watering down of news with Entertainment, completely agree. Networks started watering down their news decades ago. But Fox does the same, the Fox's viewership is much much higher than CNN's. 28 million people watch the network news shows according to the latest Nielsens. I am still waiting for a retraction from any of those three networks. Most of the breaking news stories have been WaPo and NYT, as always, and this is all due to leaks, probably from people who just can't believe what they see.

Journalism standards still do exist. Degrees matters. Reporting facts matters. And bias matters as well.


I am better than that, just you can't understand nuance I guess. Where in my post is there a single positive thing written about the right? I make a post stating what you appear to agree with, that mainstream news is generally biased, and more specifically mention BOTH sides, in CNN and Fox. But you decide to read my post, due to your own pre-conceived notion that I was in the bag for the right, as a support for right sided media.

Come on man, you are better than that!

As far as the "I hate Obamacare" right, I DO hate all new multi-billion dollar programs that have no new source of funding or equal spending cut. But once the left gets another freebie given to their people, it is extremely difficult to take it away from the dependent class.
January 30th, 2018 at 4:51:27 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5753
Quote: beachbumbabs


Trump admin announced really late last night that despite near-unanimous, bipartisan congressional vote to sanction Russia, they just can't be bothered and won't be enforcing it.



Ah, someone not enforcing the law is bad? I missed your post against sanctuary cities? Or is 'not enforcing the law' ok when it is supported by your political views?
January 30th, 2018 at 5:21:49 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: SOOPOO
Ah, someone not enforcing the law is bad? I missed your post against sanctuary cities? Or is 'not enforcing the law' ok when it is supported by your political views?


I've been seeing this argument a lot from righties. This is called "deflection."

We are talking about the President of the United States.

The Russian sanctions were passed with huge veto-proof majorities. And Donald can't be bothered to enforce them.

And of course this doesn't bother you. You're the most non-partisan member on this board. *wink wink*
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
January 30th, 2018 at 5:33:35 AM permalink
Dalex64
Member since: Mar 8, 2014
Threads: 3
Posts: 3687
Quote: SOOPOO
Ah, someone not enforcing the law is bad? I missed your post against sanctuary cities? Or is 'not enforcing the law' ok when it is supported by your political views?


Isn't that how it usually goes?

Federal law against marijuana. State laws allowing it. Federal government "de-prioritizing" enforcement - until they aren't.

Lawmakers in favor of "states rights"... and a small federal government... on issues they agree with.

Presidential "signing statements" that pretty well declare that they will not enforce the law.

How well do you think it would go over if California decided to stop following the 1995 law that requires us citizenship to vote in federal elections?

No, I don't think this is all that unusual, or a departure from recent practice, but then again I thought something was wrong with those signing statements.

This particular issue is a bit different - it was passed by a veto-proof margin, and it didn't have other "must pass" items in it that explain why the president felt he had to sign it yet ignore/nullify parts of it.

There is also a difference between disobedience of a law because of philosophical differences vs feeling a law is immoral or illegal. Legality should usually be decided by the courts. Morality sometimes bleeds back to partisan philosophy.

In this case, the stated reason is he feels "it isn't necessary" which, I believe, isn't his place to say.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan
January 30th, 2018 at 5:59:56 AM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
Paris is saved. Sort of.
The suburbs took a real hit in the flooding. Ducks wandering around far from the river, rats invading homes and businesses, but the Seine peaked just a tad bit short of overflowing its banks in Paris.

Of course the total damage involved is still less than the millions and millions of dollars stolen from the tax coffers in the Carbon Tax Fraud that people in Marseille are being tried for now.
January 30th, 2018 at 5:59:56 AM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
Paris is saved. Sort of.
The suburbs took a real hit in the flooding. Ducks wandering around far from the river, rats invading homes and businesses, but the Seine peaked just a tad bit short of overflowing its banks in Paris.

Of course the total damage involved is still less than the millions and millions of dollars stolen from the tax coffers in the Carbon Tax Fraud that people in Marseille are being tried for now.
January 30th, 2018 at 6:44:40 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: ams288
I've been seeing this argument a lot from righties. This is called "deflection."


Absolutely. There is no law or Constitutional provision that requires cities or states to cooperate with immigration agencies. So holding up sanctuary cities or states as examples of refusal to enforce the law, is ridiculous and stupid.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
January 30th, 2018 at 6:49:51 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5753
Quote: ams288
I've been seeing this argument a lot from righties. This is called "deflection."

We are talking about the President of the United States.

The Russian sanctions were passed with huge veto-proof majorities. And Donald can't be bothered to enforce them.

And of course this doesn't bother you. You're the most non-partisan member on this board. *wink wink*


LOL! DJT bothers me a lot! But exposing my lack of knowledge here.... What exactly was passed with huge veto proof majorities? What law is DJT not following? Please specifically mention a Russian sanction that is a law passed by Congress that DJT is breaking by not enforcing?

And I'll say it again. It is embarrassing that DJT is our President. Just as it is true that the country is better off with him as President than HRC. The two are not mutually exclusive.
January 30th, 2018 at 6:58:43 AM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
I thought there had already been a great breakthrough in decoding the Voynich manuscript but Slashdot just reported that artificial intelligence just provided proof that it is anagram-encoded Hebrew.

I thought we already had a thread on the manuscript but I could not find it.