 |
 |
Democratic debates
| October 16th, 2019 at 4:47:33 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18222 |
Pence did a rebuttal? The President is a fink. |
| October 16th, 2019 at 9:33:51 AM permalink | |
| DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 51 Posts: 4973 |
Just put them down the garbage disposal like we will be doing with the fetuses. At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent. |
| October 16th, 2019 at 10:02:02 AM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
Moody has Trump winning in a landslide next year. If you don't know what Moody is, never mind. As the debate last night showed, they have nobody to run against him. Their bench isn't thin, it's empty. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| October 16th, 2019 at 12:54:15 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
"Mark Zandi, Z-a-n-d-i. He’s at Moody’s. Mark Zandi is a prognosticator of some repute for Moody’s financial services, any number of analytics and data analytics. Zandi is a well-known, uber-leftist — pro-Democrat — and he is panicked, because this guy Zandi and his firm Moody’s, they have models that they use to forecast and predict presidential elections, three of them. And they have been wrong only once since 1980. All of Mark Zandi’s formulas that he uses to predict presidential reelections have been mostly dead-on accurate since 1980. “President Trump appears likely to win reelection next year, according to three different economic models Moody’s Analytics uses to measure presidential contests. Moody’s modeling, which has only missed on one presidential election since 1980, found that Trump will easily beat his 304 electoral vote total in 2016." UhOh.. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| October 16th, 2019 at 1:07:04 PM permalink | |
| terapined Member since: Aug 6, 2014 Threads: 73 Posts: 11822 |
I prefer that they are donated to science Sometimes we live no particular way but our own - Grateful Dead "Eyes of the World" |
| October 16th, 2019 at 2:13:05 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |  If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| October 16th, 2019 at 2:51:05 PM permalink | |
| rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18776 | Not really surprised. They should see how Melania does against her husband if she ran. I imagine she'd beat him like drum. (if she could run anyway.) You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
| October 23rd, 2019 at 5:59:15 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12551 | New CNN poll of the Democratic field: Biden: 34% Warren: 19% Sanders: 16% Buttigieg: 6% Harris: 6% Kinda funny how spectacularly Donny’s Ukraine scheme backfired on him. The fact the he’s gonna get impeached over it aside, people rightly see now that he’s scared of Joe Biden. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| October 23rd, 2019 at 7:46:06 AM permalink | |
| Gandler Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 27 Posts: 4256 |
She is not legally qualified. You have to be a natural citizen. Same reason Arnold Schwarzenegger was not allowed to run. |
| October 23rd, 2019 at 8:05:52 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18222 |
Why on earth would a woman run in such an election against her own husband? That Michelle polls so well shows the problems with the current Dem field. I really never understood the fascination with thinking a spouse of a pol is qualified for the same job. As if we are a monarchy or something. The President is a fink. |