In The News Today...

Notice how Duffy didn't actually answer my question. He pivoted to Byrd, who was still dead last time I checked. Then referred to "history" of Dems.

Doesn't want to admit that it ain't the Dems who are tied to the KKK today...

Quote: ams288

Notice how Duffy didn't actually answer my question. He pivoted to Byrd, who was still dead last time I checked. Then referred to "history" of Dems.

Doesn't want to admit that it ain't the Dems who are tied to the KKK today...

See, genius, the KKK has not been a national organization since the late 1960s. So it is unlikely there will be many people ANYWHERE with KKK ties. However, your Democrat Party is tied in with the KKK all thru its history, 186? to about. So if you are going to keep repeating the sorry liberal line that "the GOP is racist!" you can expect a reply that YOUR Democrat Party is the party that is historically the racist party. However, they praised their senator who was a KKK leader, allowing him to sit in the senate until the day he died.

It is amazing how the Democrats have gotten blacks who were the victims of all the racist Democrat Party policies to be the most loyal Democrats out there. Some awesome salesmanship.

The Democrat Party remains the party of racist policies today, in the form of affirmative action they still like to choose based on skin color. Things never change.

Quote: AZDuffman

See, genius,

I must have hit a nerve.

Quote: AZDuffman

The Democrat Party remains the party of racist policies today, in the form of affirmative action they still like to choose based on skin color. Things never change.

White males who arguably have been the most negatively affected by affirmative action got off easy in balance to slavery, jim crow laws and discrimination against women and other minorities.

That's just a fact for conservative crybabies to remember.

Quote: rxwine

White males who arguably have been the most negatively affected by affirmative action got off easy in balance to slavery, jim crow laws and discrimination against women and other minorities.

That's just a fact for conservative crybabies to remember.

White males were out breaking their humps to earn what they had. Many lived as virtual slaves, either officially thru indentured servitude or ending up in the company town/company store system. Nobody said, "we are going to hire X% white males for this job" because that is all that there were in the country. Women largely did not work.

But under AA, the feds said to follow your hiring quota, or else. But now it is just various "diversity" rules driving white males from many colleges and professions. Not the biggest deal, as a college education is showing less and less worth, white males will come out on top, ending up with the skilled jobs the liberal arts majors cannot do.

Meanwhile, liberals keep saying that minorities are not intelligent enough to make it on their own and need help. So who is the racist out of the two?

Quote: AZDuffman

White males were out breaking their humps to earn what they had. Many lived as virtual slaves, either officially thru indentured servitude or ending up in the company town/company store system. Nobody said, "we are going to hire X% white males for this job" because that is all that there were in the country. Women largely did not work.

But under AA, the feds said to follow your hiring quota, or else. But now it is just various "diversity" rules driving white males from many colleges and professions. Not the biggest deal, as a college education is showing less and less worth, white males will come out on top, ending up with the skilled jobs the liberal arts majors cannot do.

Meanwhile, liberals keep saying that minorities are not intelligent enough to make it on their own and need help. So who is the racist out of the two?

Your last line says you don't know the difference between squaring things and calling things even and actual racism.

Quote: rxwine

Your last line says you don't know the difference between squaring things and calling things even and actual racism.

Women libers think that it is condescending to open the door for them going into a building. Why is it not condescending to open the door to college for minorities?

Quote: kenarman

Women libers think that it is condescending to open the door for them going into a building. Why is it not condescending to open the door to college for minorities?

Neither is universally true nor universally false.

(as for Duffman's comment that women didn't work - he should watch 19th century house. They worked all day and only got whatever their husband wanted to pay them as an allowance)

Quote: rxwine

Your last line says you don't know the difference between squaring things and calling things even and actual racism.

Liberals are the ones who say minorities need help to get into college and to vote. That is racism, saying they cannot do it unless they get help.

Quote: rxwine

(as for Duffman's comment that women didn't work - he should watch 19th century house. They worked all day and only got whatever their husband wanted to pay them as an allowance)

That is not "working." An intelligent person will understand that when I said they "did not work" I mean outside the house for a salary. Providing value to someone in exchange for a paycheck. Housework gets done because it has to get done. While it may meet the scientific definition of "work: (e.g. moving some physical object) it is not "work" in an economic sense.

Feminists like to call it "work" and say it has the same value. I do not play that game. You and the girls can do so amongst each other and enjoy yourselves.

RUSH: "LGGBDTTTIQQAAPP" is the acronym. Lesbian. Gay. Genderqueer. Bisexual. Demisexual. Transgender. Transexual. Two-Spirit. Intersex. Queer. Questioning. Asexual. Allies. Pansexual. Polyamorous. Those are now all of the sexual victim groups to whom we all must express sensitivity, compassion, and understanding."

I have a better name for them. Less than
2% of the population is what they are.
Who cares.