Gun Control
November 18th, 2023 at 5:10:28 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 |
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
January 11th, 2024 at 4:10:32 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | Certainly don’t need a gun for this.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
January 12th, 2024 at 5:02:47 AM permalink | |
odiousgambit Member since: Oct 28, 2012 Threads: 154 Posts: 5112 | google translate says 'la pierre' means 'the stone' I thought it might mean 'the peter' ... ie, the dick, which would fit. Hunter related organizations also seem to be prone to these problems, I think the problem is the rank and file assume the people in charge are devoted to the cause, something these thieves reinforce of course. Instead, they want to run things so they can steal. National Wild Turkey Federation comes to mind I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me] |
January 12th, 2024 at 6:26:09 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 |
Their first mistake was hiring someone from "France" instead of a good ole boy from 'merica! You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
January 12th, 2024 at 6:28:24 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | ...spending all the money on perfume and poodles, no doubt. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
February 6th, 2024 at 3:55:36 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | Parent found guilty in son having gun and shooting students.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
April 8th, 2024 at 5:36:17 AM permalink | |
odiousgambit Member since: Oct 28, 2012 Threads: 154 Posts: 5112 | either what we are being told is not true, or this is federal law enforcement out of control supporting evidence is with what the doorbell video captured. Maybe multiple vehicles and hordes of officers proves nothing, but a search warrant can be executed during the day with a couple of guys. OK maybe you don't want to do that if dealing with hardened criminals, but in this case the guy would seem to be more of an ordinary citizen than anything. I can believe he crossed a line and got into illegal activity [to be proven] but otherwise you expect an airport official to more of an ordinary citizen. And nobody was going to be flushing guns down the toilet. Just problematic I think. You have to gum up the doorbell image so the persons in the house can't see who is there? What? This is very supportive of something amiss here. The home video can't support the other claims like breaking the door down without warning. What is really true? These cowboys are refusing to provide answers to these things I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me] |
April 8th, 2024 at 6:36:13 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the right of officers to forcibly enter within 15 to 20 seconds after announcing their presence. Other than a dangerous suspect, the other reason is evidence that can be destroyed. Paper, electronics for instance. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
April 8th, 2024 at 7:14:43 AM permalink | |
odiousgambit Member since: Oct 28, 2012 Threads: 154 Posts: 5112 | well I have two thoughts about that should anyone be defending the actions of these officers in this case? or, is what is being claimed totally wrong? did they knock and wait? were they constantly and loudly announcing who they were after kicking in the door? Did the man who was killed open fire knowing full well who they were? Were the officers right in taking this kind of extreme action, for a search warrant, against someone they hadn't charged with anything because of some factor not being revealed? Did they need evidence other than guns? much argues against it, primarily though that action of inactivating the doorbell camera argues against them. I'd like to know what that thinking was. I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me] |
April 8th, 2024 at 7:55:19 AM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | You can also use a doorbell camera to know where to shoot someone outside your home. If you have a gun powerful enough, you don't need to open anything to shoot. What's the gun rule on shooting when you don't know who or what you're shooting at? I don't think cops have any obligation to protect outside surveillance as they approach a house they are going to breach whether it's doorbell camera or something else. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |