DeSantis: the real deal?

Quote: DoubleGold

I copied and pasted your quote at the bottom.

Are you claiming you didn't write those words?

I know you enjoy playing word games.

“I think him trying to force mandatory genital exams on child athletes is a form of abuse. Big Tits is one sick puppy!”

If you can’t comprehend what “trying to” means, I don’t know how to help you.

All the talk here is just talk, of course. The real ‘talk’ was at the polls, and 3/5 of Floridians liked what DeSantis was doing, and is continuing to do. IT WASN’T CLOSE. Without Trump interference DeSantis is EASILY the next President. He would crush Biden/Harris.

Lucky for the left Trump is too self centered and would rather punish the country by handing the election to the Dems if he (Trump) is not the nominee.
‘See, I told you I was the only one who could beat Biden again’

Quote: ams288

I know you enjoy playing word games.

“I think him trying to force mandatory genital exams on child athletes is a form of abuse. Big Tits is one sick puppy!”

If you can’t comprehend what “trying to” means, I don’t know how to help you.

I got you.

So you're claiming DeSantis influenced the drafting of the original legislation so he is abusive to children as opposed to protecting them?

The text below begins on line #12 in the link.

For clarity, is the following wording what you claim as being "abuse" before DeSantis signed the modified legislation?

-----------------------------------------------

requiring the school or institution to request a
certain health examination and consent form or other
statement from the student's health care provider to
verify the student's biological sex under certain
circumstances;

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/1475/BillText/c1/PDF

-------------------------------------------------

Quote: ams288

I am stating that Ron DeSantis has BIG OL TITTIES.

That has absolutely nothing to do with children. lmao

It is my experience that people that spend their time attacking others physical properties do so because they are trying compensate for their own undersized bodies.

Quote: kenarman

It is my experience that people that spend their time attacking others physical properties do so because they are trying compensate for their own undersized bodies.

ams repeatedly calling out DeSantis’ man boobs is certainly childish. I would make no connection to his (ams’) appearance from his puerile insults.

Quote: SOOPOO

ams repeatedly calling out DeSantis’ man boobs is certainly childish. I would make no connection to his (ams’) appearance from his puerile insults.

It is childish
but
You refuse to acknowledge that Desantis is an anti vaxxer
Just as childish to put your head in the sand
Be an adult and admit you support an anti vaxxer for President!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote: kenarman

It is my experience that people that spend their time attacking others physical properties do so because they are trying compensate for their own undersized bodies.

I will not deny that my titties are undersized.

Quote: DoubleGold

The recent issue is child grooming.

Disney is in a perfect position.

DeSantis is trying to prevent it through law and politics.

So if you attack DeSantis with sexual phrases like "Big Tits" (on a man no less), what are you really stating in regards to children?

Great position? You have to pay thousands of dollars (for most people) to even visit the park. Consumer choice would enable people to avoid all of their products. If parents disagree with Disney's so-called, "Corporate values," which is really just Disney protecting future profit margins by sailing in the direction the socio-political winds are blowing, then Disney is readily avoided.

I don't know where you draw the line at potential for indoctrination, but if Disney crosses the line, then it would be inconsistent for certain churches not to cross the line. Of course, the same argument applies, parents could simply not expose their kids to it.

Honestly, I'm really trying to figure out where you stand on things, in general. As a general question, do you think corporations should be sanctioned for the ideologies that they choose to promote-yes or no?

Quote: Mission146

Great position? You have to pay thousands of dollars (for most people) to even visit the park. Consumer choice would enable people to avoid all of their products. If parents disagree with Disney's so-called, "Corporate values," which is really just Disney protecting future profit margins by sailing in the direction the socio-political winds are blowing, then Disney is readily avoided.

I don't know where you draw the line at potential for indoctrination, but if Disney crosses the line, then it would be inconsistent for certain churches not to cross the line. Of course, the same argument applies, parents could simply not expose their kids to it.

Honestly, I'm really trying to figure out where you stand on things, in general. As a general question, do you think corporations should be sanctioned for the ideologies that they choose to promote-yes or no?

Disney is in a perfect position to influence the magnitudes because of their relationship to children (child grooming).


Normally, I'd say the vote has to come from consumers not buying the Disney product (reduced sales) not from the government.

Government should butt out.

But Disney is a special case because they were allowed to form their own government within Florida.

Disney should have never been allowed a competitive advantage from the government in the first place.

So the actions are an attempt to adjust a previous noncompetitive action.