In the News II
Thread Rating:
| October 18th, 2024 at 10:04:02 AM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Feb 19, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 5729 |
You of course haven’t answered my earlier question (maybe you did and I missed it…) China decides to dominate the widget market. USA widget manufacturers need to sell widgets for a dollar to make a profit. China decides to lose a few billion $$ and will sell its widgets for $0.80. Should our President impose a tariff or just tell the American widget factory to close? That’s one example. As a general rule I would agree most tariffs are not good. And certainly Trump isn’t the guy to decide when and how to use them. But just saying ‘tariff bad’ is too simplistic for the real geo political world we live in. |
| October 18th, 2024 at 10:49:37 AM permalink | |
| rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 217 Posts: 22931 |
All you have to do is look up alternatives to tariffs. "Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP. |
| October 18th, 2024 at 10:52:04 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 137 Posts: 21195 |
Or just wait until a Democrat proposes a tariff then the left wingers will be giddy for the idea. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
| October 18th, 2024 at 12:32:48 PM permalink | |
| DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 57 Posts: 5896 |
Unless the widget pertains to national security he should tell them to build a different widget. At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a deterrent. |
| October 18th, 2024 at 12:51:50 PM permalink | |
| JimRockford Member since: Sep 18, 2015 Threads: 2 Posts: 1061 |
Why do you think Biden left nearly all of the Trump tariffs in place. Protectionism is a Democrat move. A government of laws and not of men. - John Adam’s |
| October 18th, 2024 at 2:08:50 PM permalink | |
| Tanko Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 2470 |
Yeah Right I take it you forgot about Bill Clinton's China WTO deal and Obama's Pacific Trade deal. The disaster that nearly was. 'Despite the Administration’s rhetoric, its own analysis suggests that, after China enters the WTO, the U.S. trade deficit with China will expand, not contract. The contradiction between the Administration’s (Clinton's) claims and its own economic analysis makes it impossible to take seriously its economic argument for giving China permanent trade concessions.' |
| October 18th, 2024 at 2:14:59 PM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 137 Posts: 21195 |
Letting China into the WTO was the worst geopolitical move since WWII. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
| October 19th, 2024 at 4:27:28 AM permalink | |
| rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 217 Posts: 22931 |
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP. |
| October 19th, 2024 at 4:47:46 AM permalink | |
| Tanko Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 2470 |
Clinton's 'China Relations Act' of 2000, cost the US economy 3.7 million jobs between 2001 and 2018. 2.8 million of those jobs lost were in manufacturing. He signed that Act seven ears after he signed the NAFTA agreement which cost the US nearly 4.5 million manufacturing jobs by 2018. Both sides are to blame for those disasters, but the buck stopped with Clinton. |
| October 19th, 2024 at 5:41:38 AM permalink | |
| terapined Member since: Aug 6, 2014 Threads: 76 Posts: 12501 |
If those 3.7 million jobs goes to people that work harder for less money, I'm all for it. If quality is the same I'd rather buy a cheap China widget then an expensive US widget Free trade raises the world's economy All my investments in reality are based on the worldwide economy doing well TSM is rocking Taiwan Semiconductor is making sure my retirement is comfortable :-) I'm selfish. I want the worldwide economy to grow I'm for Capitalism and Free Trade Sometimes we live no particular way but our own - Grateful Dead "Eyes of the World" |

