Trump and Epstein

Quote: missedhervee

How have we sunk so low as a people to openly welcome a convicted felon, serial cheater and self-aggrandizing flim-flam man to lead us?

Does not compute.

Disillusionment and Disinvestment in your own democracy status quo. That ripened you up for a flim-flam man to come in and promise the earth ( or rather, promise to undo everything the previous guys did).

What may be in the files on Trump?

What is the most likely nefarious behavior Trump would be involved based on what most people recognize about him?

Some sort of financial fraud.

It's said the investigations didn't delve into following the money so that may be what he is afraid of with further investigations. Seems likely, the statute of limitations has probably run out, unless it is directly related to sex trafficking and sexual abuse.

I doubt much will come of it assuming Bondi and her drones have scrubbed and sanitized ("redacted") the files to remove any incriminating evidence which would implicate Trump and those he wishes to protect.

Presumably the attorneys handling the Epstein estate have read the documents / emails and may even have copied same: they'd be the ones to subpoena and depose in order to seek the unredacted materials: I wouldn't trust the AG to be "transparent" as far as I could throw the oaf.

Love this..."Epstein-O-Matic"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc-VsO3x_Dk

In a new ‘you can’t make this shit up’ moment for ANOTHER Democrat African American woman, Representative Plaskett of the USVI received multiple campaign contributions from Epstein and his lawyer and assistants. Maybe ok? Buttttttt…..

During her time addressing the House she WAS GETTING TEXTS directly from Epstein on ways to smear Trump!!!! DURING ACTUAL TESTIMONY!
The Republicans tried to censure her over such, but couldn’t get a single Democrat to think that behavior was censure worthy.

The Democrat party….

Quote: SOOPOO

In a new ‘you can’t make this shit up’ moment for ANOTHER Democrat African American woman, Representative Plaskett of the USVI received multiple campaign contributions from Epstein and his lawyer and assistants. Maybe ok? Buttttttt…..

During her time addressing the House she WAS GETTING TEXTS directly from Epstein on ways to smear Trump!!!! DURING ACTUAL TESTIMONY!
The Republicans tried to censure her over such, but couldn’t get a single Democrat to think that behavior was censure worthy.

The Democrat party….

Why would it be censure worthy? Did she allegedly break any laws or Congress rules or ethics policies?

Meanwhile, Cory Mills (R-FL) was banging prostitutes while on a trip to Afghanistan to rescue Americans after the Taliban took over. He's also accused of "stolen valor" (easily provable or not, based on his DD-214), beating his gf, and soliciting and obtaining improper gifts. Republicans....

Again, got a problem with African-Americans in Congress, or women in Congress? Since you keep pointing these attributes out one might think you do.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Why would it be censure worthy? Did she allegedly break any laws or Congress rules or ethics policies?


Again, got a problem with African-Americans in Congress, or women in Congress? Since you keep pointing these attributes out one might think you do.

I only have a problem with the 3 I’ve mentioned recently. I’ve disliked Maxine Waters for quite a while as well.
The most recent Congressman I had the biggest problem with was George Santos. White as can be. Male as well. Heck, even Republican, too.

Censure worthy? I don’t know, giving a convicted pedophile direct access to question witnesses with you acting as his mouthpiece seems censure worthy to me. You can disagree.

Quote: SOOPOO

George Santos...Male as well...

Maybe male by birth, but he's fem and as queer as a three dollar bill.

Quote: SOOPOO

I only have a problem with the 3 I’ve mentioned recently. I’ve disliked Maxine Waters for quite a while as well.
The most recent Congressman I had the biggest problem with was George Santos. White as can be. Male as well. Heck, even Republican, too.

Censure worthy? I don’t know, giving a convicted pedophile direct access to question witnesses with you acting as his mouthpiece seems censure worthy to me. You can disagree.

You want to censure her for the same thing Todd Blanche is doing on behalf of Donny? She broke no laws or House rules or ethics. She was communicating with a person who had knowledge of the issue(s) being discussed at the hearing. Sounds like a proper investigatory tool to me.

Why mention race and/or gender if it has no bearing on your hatred?

Quote: GenoDRPh

You want to censure her for the same thing Todd Blanche is doing on behalf of Donny? She broke no laws or House rules or ethics. She was communicating with a person who had knowledge of the issue(s) being discussed at the hearing. Sounds like a proper investigatory tool to me.

Why mention race and/or gender if it has no bearing on your hatred?

It has no bearing on my hatred, because I have no real hatred. But I mention it more as an anecdotal coincidence as there are not that many African American women Congresspeople and they are on a really bad run lately. Yes, I’d like her censured for having a convicted pedophile questioning witnesses at a Congressional hearing. Seems censure worthy to me. It is not a criminal case. It’s an ethics case. To me, what she did was unethical. And 200+ Congresspeople agreed. But slightly more disagreed, so no censure.

Quote: SOOPOO

It has no bearing on my hatred, because I have no real hatred. But I mention it more as an anecdotal coincidence as there are not that many African American women Congresspeople and they are on a really bad run lately. Yes, I’d like her censured for having a convicted pedophile questioning witnesses at a Congressional hearing. Seems censure worthy to me. It is not a criminal case. It’s an ethics case. To me, what she did was unethical. And 200+ Congresspeople agreed. But slightly more disagreed, so no censure.

Not even close to censure-worthy. Epstein had info that she wanted so she got it from him. All legit. The same thing Todd Blanche is doing with Maxwell. Next you're going to tell us that prosecutors shouldn't ask convicts about crimes they witnessed.

Word of advice: If you don't want to be considered a racist or having racial animus, don't mention race when discussing why you don't like someone.

"Anecdotal coincidence"? The plural of anecdote is not data. Another piece of free advice.