What Movies Have You Seen Lately?

September 17th, 2016 at 11:08:12 AM permalink
Ayecarumba
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 89
Posts: 1744
I thought Edge of Tomorrow was just okay. It is very much like Groundhog Day with automatic weapons. I thought the looping got boring, very much like a video game that you need to go back to start everytime you lose a life... oops.... was that a spoiler? I thought the resolution of the story arc was weak and too predictable. The best one word review from me is: "Irritating", like the kid in the back seat of the car repeating every five minutes, "Are we there yet?".

I recently got around to watching Suicide Squad. The writer made a big mistake by demonstrating the apparently unstoppable capability of the antagonists early in the film... powers which for some unexplained reason are not used in the climactic confrontation in the fourth act. One word review, "Disappointing".
September 17th, 2016 at 11:21:17 AM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: Ayecarumba
I thought Edge of Tomorrow was just okay. It is very much like Groundhog Day with automatic weapons. .


Wow, did we watch two different movies?
It's NOTHING like GHD at all. They have
one thing in common, going back in time
one day every day. Other than that, there
are no similarities. I could list the differences,
but they would all be spoilers.

For one thing, GHD had a budget of nothing
compared to EoT. And GHD was a comedy, EoT
is an action flick. GHD was go go go, GHD
was so slow you almost go to sleep.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
September 18th, 2016 at 4:58:56 PM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6376
Quote: Ayecarumba
I thought Edge of Tomorrow was just okay.


Thanks

It struck me as preposterous 30 minutes in. I think I have decided to give it another try though.
I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
September 18th, 2016 at 5:33:00 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: odiousgambit
I think I have decided to give it another try though.


I really liked the aliens in EoT. They were
very believable. As alien from us as you
could get, a super smart species that
uses cunning to get what they want
instead of overwhelming brute force.
I had to see it 3 times just to fully figure
out what they were doing.

Fight scene after Cruise has relived the
battle a hundred times and has got it
down:

If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
September 18th, 2016 at 6:50:19 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Both Groundhog Day and Edge of Tomorrow got excellent reviews, but there is always a big name critic who hates your movie.
Quote: Negative Groundhog Day review
(The total lack of chemistry between Murray and MacDowell's respective characters ensures that their scenes together lack the romantic spark that Ramis has surely intended.)

The intentionally repetitive nature of the film's premise paves the way for a second half that's almost entirely lacking in momentum, which ultimately prevents the viewer from wholeheartedly embracing the feel-good conclusion (ie it's an awfully tough slog getting to that point).

It's ultimately difficult to comprehend why Groundhog Day has become something of a modern classic in the years since its 1993 release, with the film's forgettable, padded-out nature confirming its place as a promising yet disposable high-concept comedy.
Quote: Negative Edge of Tomorrowy review

Last Thursday, Tom Cruise made a surprise appearance at Showplace ICON theaters for a preview screening of his latest blockbuster, Edge of Tomorrow. When a huge star like that walks into a theater full of fans, there's a sort of convulsion as people shriek and leap to their feet; it's pretty exciting even if you don't share in the hysteria. Cruise gave a little spiel for the movie, posed for a photograph with the whole audience standing behind him, and soon split. He did make one interesting comment before he left, noting that he loves movies so much he watches one every day. That couch-jumping enthusiasm is the reason people still like Cruise, even after three decades in the spotlight have turned him into a rather eccentric character.

Cruise's bread and butter, though, has always been the big summer movie, and Edge of Tomorrow is his second sci-fi adventure in a row, following last summer's Oblivion. After a meteor hits Germany, Europe is overrun by giant beasts that look like a cross between an octopus and a bramble bush, and Cruise plays a military press attache forced into combat as British and U.S. forces stage a sort of Normandy landing in France.

"What day is it?" he asks his commanding officer. "For you, Judgment Day," the officer cracks. On the contrary, it's actually Groundhog Day: when Cruise is killed in action, he goes into a time loop and relives the same day over and over again until he and Emily Blunt, playing a millennial Joan of Arc called "the Angel of Verdun," can find a route to victory against the aliens.

Time-travel movies are almost a genre unto themselves, and this particular gimmick of incessantly reliving the same day has already been incorporated into one thriller, the much superior Source Code (2011). Edge of Tomorrow is a decent time waster, but if you're the sort of person who watches a movie every day, you should probably look for something better. I would hate to get caught in a loop and have to watch this thing a hundred times.
September 18th, 2016 at 7:04:45 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: Pacomartin
Both Groundhog Day and Edge of Tomorrow got excellent reviews, but there is always a big name critic who hates your movie.


It's like they saw neither movie. EoT is as much
like GHD as an apple is like a banana. They
panned GHD much more too, and how can
you not like that movie. Bill Murray at his
best. I agree that MacDowell was not the
best choice, but it worked OK. I would
rather have seen somebody less glamorous
and more down to earth and sarcastic,
like Meg Ryan. (I just got a shock, I
had no idea she was 55, how sad. No
wonder we never see her anymore.)
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
September 18th, 2016 at 7:42:21 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Evenbob
I would rather have seen somebody less glamorous and more down to earth and sarcastic, like Meg Ryan. (I just got a shock, I had no idea she was 55, how sad. No wonder we never see her anymore.)


Meg Ryan made 29 movies, but is chiefly remembered for her five biggest hits. Sleepless was her big hit when Groundhog Day came out.
12/18/98 You've Got Mail
4/10/98 City of Angels
6/25/93 Sleepless in Seattle
7/14/89 When Harry Met Sally...
5/16/86 Top Gun

Meg Ryan was age 24 when Top Gun was released, and Julia Roberts was age 22 when Pretty Women was released. They were pretty similar superstar tracks. But Meg Ryan tried to break type by making Hurlyburly. I saw Hurlyburly in the theater, and I had a friend who worked in the theater company at the time. I told her I had to leave midway, as the play was so dark and misanthropic that I wanted to shoot myself.

Somehow Julia Roberts made the much smarter choice for her breakout role in Erin Brockovich where she was extremely well paid,and received huge critical acclaim. All anyone could feel about Meg Ryan is what happened to the cute charming actress everyone fell in love with. Meg Ryan never really recovered to re-enter the spotlight. Julia's glory days never quite returned, but she didn't drop off the map.

Sandra Bullock is obviously doing much better as a middle aged actress, but maybe that's because she was age 30 when Speed came out. We don't have this image of Sandra quite like Julia or Meg in their 20's, so it is much easier to accept her as a woman her age.
September 18th, 2016 at 7:52:43 PM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
I don't know guys, perhaps I have to work on my suspension of disbelief skills. I feel so overdosed with all this vampire, zombie, alien invasions, war of the worlds where the planet is saved by some young girl with a fourteen inch waist hoisting a mega weapon of laser death that I don't think I could sit thru any of the movies recently mentioned in this thread.

I realize there are different worlds out there... ever been dragged out to Greek Rebetiko Club? Smoke filled fetid basement and people actually buy drinks and pour them on the floor, sing songs praising heroin use and celebrating prison life, homosexuality and prostitution. Attendees talk during a performer's song and dance routine, the food is very limited and the menu never changes. Yet Greeks seem to consider this a proper celebration of the Greek culture in Florida.

It used to be that a Dark Cabaret would feature at least some songs in English, but now it seems nothing is sung in English and nudity is common. Why are so many girls at Cabarets these days dancing alone or with other girls. And I can understand this rage about men wearing hats but doesn't it seem strange that at a Cabaret these days virtually no male is without a hat.

The real world is changing ... so I guess its only proper that the movie world is changing as well, but would that these changes were for the better.
September 18th, 2016 at 8:07:48 PM permalink
zippyboy
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 2
Posts: 665
Quote: Evenbob
I really liked the aliens in EoT. They were
very believable. As alien from us as you
could get, a super smart species that
uses cunning to get what they want
instead of overwhelming brute force.

YES! Thank you Bob. It's always been preposterous that every alien in every movie going back decades has been humanoid. I like Star Trek okay, but every episode has English-speaking humanoid aliens with a different forehead bump so the viewer can identify them, except for the Horta in Devil in the Dark. Scientists can't possibly know that carbon is as common on a planet 10,000 light years from here that evolved wholly differently from Earth. Finally, EoT had intelligent aliens from another world which behaved differently and didn't speak English. Shout out to Starship Troopers which also had believable aliens and great special effects.
September 18th, 2016 at 8:27:22 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22938
Well there is a gaseous cloud force which takes on the from of Dr McCoys wife. There are also some disembodied aliens like the parents of Apollo. And a few fairly smart alien machines. And Tribbles!
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.