Supreme Court strikes down Roe v. Wade?

Quote: rxwine

Odiousgambit said I shouldn't pick on Justice Thomas for the majority opinion on the gun ruling. But I'm going to again.

Justice Thomas says the Supreme Court should reconsider rulings that protect access to contraception and same-sex marriage as the court overturns Roe v. Wade in his concurring opinion.

lol

Quote:

Trump, who tipped the balance of SCOTUS in such a way that ensured the end of Roe v Wade happened, has been privately telling people for weeks the ruling will be "bad for Republicans"

The Attorney General of New York just said the majority of states have Democrats as Attorneys General.

How can you get a fact like that wrong?

In general, she made good points about how to proceed in the states moving forward. That is where this issue always belonged; RBG, and liberal legal experts, knew this was a strong possibility.

Quote: RonC

The Attorney General of New York just said the majority of states have Democrats as Attorneys General.

How can you get a fact like that wrong?

In general, she made good points about how to proceed in the states moving forward. That is where this issue always belonged; RBG, and liberal legal experts, knew this was a strong possibility.

Whatever. You’re not the one being told how to make decisions for your own body. Why not just let the state completely monitor how the woman is acting in relation to her pregnancy so you can make sure she’s not ingesting harmful substances are engaging in fetal dangerous activity?

Quote: rxwine

Whatever. You’re not the one being told how to make decisions for your own body. Why not just let the state completely monitor how the woman is acting in relation to her pregnancy so you can make sure she’s not ingesting harmful substances are engaging in fetal dangerous activity?

A decision that destroys a life she created. So is it just her body at that point?

If we had not had 7 men decide to find a fake constitutional right 50 years ago, each state would have finished the process of making abortion rules years ago. Perhaps some would have changed over time. The issue would be mostly resolved at this point: They are the ones who screwed it up. Legal scholars are not talking about this being an incorrect ruling. Ones who support Roe are mounting other arguments outside of the way it was decided.

Quote: RonC

A decision that destroys a life she created. So is it just her body at that point?

If we had not had 7 men decide to find a fake constitutional right 50 years ago, each state would have finished the process of making abortion rules years ago. Perhaps some would have changed over time. The issue would be mostly resolved at this point: They are the ones who screwed it up. Legal scholars are not talking about this being an incorrect ruling. Ones who support Roe are mounting other arguments outside of the way it was decided.

Word salad nonsense.

RonC will of course be happy to vote for any Republican who runs on complete abortion ban for all 50 states.

He doesn’t think Donny should run again in 2024, but will of course vote for him if he does get the nomination.

Who cares what he thinks about any issue, honestly?

Quote: RonC

A decision that destroys a life she created. So is it just her body at that point?

If we had not had 7 men decide to find a fake constitutional right 50 years ago, each state would have finished the process of making abortion rules years ago. Perhaps some would have changed over time. The issue would be mostly resolved at this point: They are the ones who screwed it up. Legal scholars are not talking about this being an incorrect ruling. Ones who support Roe are mounting other arguments outside of the way it was decided.

Sure, now you're forced into making women carry their rapist's baby. Protecting human life is a higher right than forcing a women to carry a rapist baby even your own daughter.

You're the one that wants to give a clump of cells the importance of a baby at birth

Quote: rxwine

Sure, now you're forced into making women carry their rapists baby. Protecting human life is a higher right than forcing a women to carry a rapist baby even your own daughter.

If she is raped she can get treated after at the hospital when reporting it to police. Or just use the morning after pill.

Quote:

You're the one that wants to give a clump of cells the importance of a baby at birth

You are also just a clump of cells so you should be careful the wording you use. If you believe in science life begins at conception.

Quote: AZDuffman

If she is raped she can get treated after at the hospital when reporting it to police. Or just use the morning after pill.



You are also just a clump of cells so you should be careful the wording you use. If you believe in science life begins at conception.

When you claim personhood is real for a clump of cells, any killing is murder.

Quote: rxwine

When you claim personhood is real for a clump of cells, any killing is murder.

You are just a clump of cells. You are an atheist so admit you have no soul. Thus that is all you are as well.