General Election 2024

Quote: RonC

The polling may be going his way but he is a long way from winning the election.

As far as time goes, yeah, long way. As far as support goes it's only going to get stronger and stronger. People know what they had with him and they know what they've got with Biden. Like the experts keep saying on both sides no candidate has ever been in Trump's position before in modern times where we already know 100%, what's going to happen when Trump is president because he's already done it. He can totally run on that which he is doing and nobody can argue. You can call him Hitler, and a dictator, and that he smells bad, that he's going to get us into a nuclear war, it's all bolonry and people know it's baloney. Teddy Roosevelt was in this position over 100 years ago where he had one term and then later ran for a second term and he totally ran on what he did in the first term and he won handily. People like knowing what they're going to get.

Quote: Evenbob

Jack Smith Denied! SCOTUS Won’t Fast-Track Trump Immunity Case

No big surprise here, the Supreme Court is giving the middle finger to Jack Smith so now the case has to work its way through the lower courts starting sometime in January and if it does reach the Supreme Court it will go on the docket as a regular case and the court won't decide on it till June. After that the trial process can begin and it probably won't happen until 2025. Cases like this typically can take years to process.

There are some other issues that Ed Meese picked up on (unconstitutional).

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/former-reagan-ag-edwin-meese-claims-legal-filing/

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Trump will be allowed on the ballot. They are not a bunch of idiots like they are in Colorado, they know it would be unconstitutional to say otherwise.

It was good they did that, because most of us wouldn't have seen the pattern of the Civil War.

It's like playing Texas Hold'em against someone without the other person wearing sunglasses.

After someone reported the pattern (Trump-Lincoln), I began to think of other events, like whites being targeted (DEI).


One piece of their plan was racial.

Since many whites in the South were prejudice, they misdirected against whites, to make the Democrat Party look like they aren't prejudice.

It had to do with history.


It's similar with wealth and guns.

But no matter how hard they try to hide, remove, or redirect history (such as monuments), it's different with the internet.


The common denominator in all this negative stuff right now we're experiencing is the Democrat Party.

It's not Trump and it wasn't Lincoln.

Trump and Lincoln just got in their way (alphas?).

It's the ideology of their Democrat minds.

Quote: Evenbob

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Trump will be allowed on the ballot. They are not a bunch of idiots like they are in Colorado, they know it would be unconstitutional to say otherwise.

Donnie engaged in an insurrection to illegally overturn the results of a free and fair election. He is disqualified from office.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Donnie engaged in an insurrection to illegally overturn the results of a free and fair election. He is disqualified from office.

Unfortunately he is not convicted. But, I agree he should be morally disqualified from running (frankly he has been morally disqualified since the 80s.)

Quote: GenoDRPh

Donnie engaged in an insurrection to illegally overturn the results of a free and fair election. He is disqualified from office.

If that's true then why has he not been charged with insurrection. In fact not a single person who was arrested was charged with insurrection. The reason they can't charge anybody is because they can't prove it because it never happened. Duh.

Quote: Gandler

Unfortunately he is not convicted. But, I agree he should be morally disqualified from running (frankly he has been morally disqualified since the 80s.)

You make a good point Gandler.

Because I researched him.

And I'm not only referring to morality.


I just don't post what I know about him for the sake of humanity.

Could someone please point out where it says you have to be *convicted* of insurrection?

Quote:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

Quote: Evenbob

If that's true then why has he not been charged with insurrection. In fact not a single person who was arrested was charged with insurrection. The reason they can't charge anybody is because they can't prove it because it never happened. Duh.

https://www.citizensforethics.org/news/press-releases/judge-removes-couy-griffin-from-office-for-engaging-in-the-january-6-insurrection/