Home » Controversial Topics » Current Issues » Climate Change -- conspiracy theory or is it time we all drive a Prius?
Climate Change -- conspiracy theory or is it time we all drive a Prius?
September 28th, 2015 at 2:55:43 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
The Pentagon has plans for what to do if Canada or the Brits go to war with us. That does not make it likely, just means they can pay to have people think of every possibility. The reality is there is no way to quantify "more severe weather events." There is no reason to believe a change in temp would make it happen. There is no reason to believe warmer is less stable than colder. And yes, our military is happy to take our money and freedom. "Military-Industrial Complex" is what it is called.
No, it is not. The difference is I think for myself and don't just listen to the pigs because they are the supposedly the smartest animals in the farm. I have given my reasoning here many times, the reply is always, "SHUT UP AND LISTEN TO THE SCIENTISTS!" The President is a fink. |
September 28th, 2015 at 3:43:45 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18764 | If you follow the money you're just as likely to end up on either side of this. If not, why not? You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
October 10th, 2015 at 9:44:00 PM permalink | |
reno Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 58 Posts: 1384 |
Publicly, Exxon's official position is that global warming doesn't exist. However, behind the scenes, Exxon has invested million$ in scientific research to study how the melting ice caps will help or hinder their Arctic drilling operations. The good news for Exxon is that less ice allows for longer construction and shipping seasons.
On the other hand, Exxon's scientists found that climate change will lead to higher ocean waves, which affects Exxon's off-shore rigs. Global warming is a mixed bag. Winners & losers... |
October 11th, 2015 at 7:48:07 AM permalink | |
kenarman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 14 Posts: 4521 |
You have an 's' in there you don't need Reno, the Antarctic ice cap has been adding ice for 5 years and is now the largest it has ever been since satellite records. Do your research. "but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin |
October 11th, 2015 at 9:46:54 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 | Inconvenient Truths: 2014 Global Natural Disasters Down Massively! …No Trend In Tornado/Cyclones Since 1950! We were supposed to have "more extreme" weather by now, seems it has not happened. For those who say it has not been long enough yer, "Earth in the Balance" was published 23 years ago, and yet we still have no noticeable change in climate. That is almost a generation, folks. The President is a fink. |
October 11th, 2015 at 12:56:41 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
90% fewer deaths last year from natural disasters than normal. Hurricanes and tornado's at record lows. I guess this is climate change, but in the opposite direction of what they said it would be. How do we get it back to normal, build more coal fueled power plants? lol If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 11th, 2015 at 1:27:26 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
I think you mean build fewer. Seriously, I always say both "warmer is better" and "how do we know that we are at the 'right' temperature?" Height of arrogance to think we can control the climate. The President is a fink. |
October 11th, 2015 at 1:39:12 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
No. If it's not now normal, and we seem to always want normal, to get back to more bad storms we have to build more. I'm being facetious. The sun is obviously behind all of it, nothing we can do about that. Our problem is, we kept no weather records at all till about 150 years ago, and not good ones until well into the 20th century. We have no historical data to go on. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 11th, 2015 at 1:44:08 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18212 |
Wish more people understood this. I feel like I am the only person pointing it out. The President is a fink. |
October 11th, 2015 at 2:00:13 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Like the article said, we only have maybe 20 years of real tornado data, since Doppler radar was introduced. We know there are far fewer killer tornado's since 1950 because of reported deaths. Between 1875 and 1940, there were 5 times more deaths from tornado's per year than now. It's even worse than that when you consider there was less than half as many people here at that time. In the Wizard of Oz, them running to the tornado shelter was no joke, it's was part of life if you lived on the plains. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |