In The News Today...
Thread Rating:
January 13th, 2022 at 3:24:16 PM permalink | |
DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 51 Posts: 4977 |
probably not that much, most if not all, Nfl owners dont own 100% At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent. |
January 13th, 2022 at 4:06:49 PM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18255 |
They have to have a majority. And they have to be liquid to both buy and have working capital. You need well over $1 Billion. The President is a fink. |
January 13th, 2022 at 5:39:00 PM permalink | |
RonC Member since: Nov 7, 2012 Threads: 8 Posts: 2510 | The NFL does have two majority owners of color. I suspect that they will have more in the future. There has to be a team for sale and a group with a majority partner holding 30% of the team with all kinds of rules, Not an impossible bar, but it is a small number of opportunities. Take Daniel Snyder's team from him...he is a horrible owner anyway. (That is in jest, unless cause is found, because you don't take stuff from owners just to give it someone else...maybe someone can buy the team from him! |
January 13th, 2022 at 7:43:19 PM permalink | |
fleaswatter Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 3 Posts: 1087 | Guess who said the following: “It is time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree, that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down.” Let's go Brandon |
January 13th, 2022 at 7:56:22 PM permalink | |
missedhervee Member since: Apr 23, 2021 Threads: 96 Posts: 3117 |
So what? The issue is BLACK owners, not Asians or Pakistanis. How many Asian or Pakistani NFL players are there? Were there recently "Paki lives matter" protests? Of course not. No, the current NFL is like an old school southern plantation with the field hands (players), overeseers (coaches) and of course the owners (masters). The more things change, the more they stay the same. |
January 14th, 2022 at 1:30:44 AM permalink | |
petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/global-economy-heading-mother-all-supply-chain-shocks-china-locks-down-ports The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
January 14th, 2022 at 2:49:16 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18255 |
Yes, they stay the same. Skin color is the most important thing to liberals. The President is a fink. |
January 14th, 2022 at 4:08:23 AM permalink | |
Tanko Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 1998 |
So, the nation that created the Covid virus, and is conducting chemical warfare on our young, the future of our economy, by sending tons of fentanyl to our shores, is now closing their ports over concern about the spread of Covid. They’re doing this to wreck our economy and our future, even more. This is why Trump was trying to move the supply side back to the US. Currently 96 container ships waiting to be unloaded, off southern California ports. One year into the supply chain crisis, it finally dawned on Buttegeig to visit the ports of LA and Long Beach. Not to meet with the port operators or Union officials, but for a photo op, and to be able to say he went there. Biden has never gone there. Went instead, to the the automated Port of Baltimore, where there is no congestion, to give another one of his bumper sticker slogan speeches. Trump was also trying to move pharmaceutical drug manufacturing back to Puerto Rico, to end our reliance on China, who currently supplies 90% of our antibiotics, and 70% of other drugs. Biden ended that idea. More drug warfare: Current Resolved Drug Shortages Reported to FDA “Chinese pharmaceutical companies have supplied more than 90 percent of U.S. antibiotics, vitamin C, ibuprofen and hydrocortisone, as well as 70 percent of acetaminophen and 40 to 45 percent of heparin in recent years, according to Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations.” |
January 14th, 2022 at 4:15:37 AM permalink | |
ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12571 |
“Trump was trying” “Trump was trying” Yeah, too bad he was incompetent at pretty much everything and failed at most stuff he tried (other than court packing thanks to Mitch). “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
January 14th, 2022 at 4:55:03 AM permalink | |
Mission146 Administrator Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 23 Posts: 4147 |
I'm not convinced. It's a small as hell sample size. Arthur Blank, acquired the Falcons in 2002...and since then, there have been seven changes of majority ownership in the NFL. At least one of those has been that of the Raiders, where it just went from father to son. I don't know how many of the other six were a matter of family and how many were straight purchases. What would you do? Make a rule that the next time an NFL team comes up for sale it can only be sold to a majority black owner? Quite frankly, I wouldn't really care if you did because there probably should be more than zero black NFL owners...my point is just that the opportunity to buy an NFL team doesn't come up much. There are also only seven black billionaires in the United States, so the easiest path would be for one of them to want to buy an NFL team. I can't say for sure that all seven of them would want to do that---Oprah, for instance, doesn't really seem like the football type. Michael Jordan is a billionaire. Do you think he wouldn't be permitted to buy an NFL team? Roger Goddell would mess his pants (in front) at the prospect of Michael Jordan owning an NFL team, come on, man! Of course Jordan could buy a team. "War is the remedy that our enemies have chosen..let us give them all they want." William T. Sherman |