In The News Today...

Thread Rating:

February 21st, 2023 at 4:22:53 AM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6378
Quote: PotPie
Female journalists are being harassed online.
Much more than male journalists.
This is really disgusting.
Creeps hiding behind an online persona.
The web has really enabled these misfits.
This stuff is not trivial; it is a reflection of sick society.



https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/07/majority-of-female-journalists-have-been-target-of-online-violence-report#:~:text=Globally%2C%20the%20research%20found%20that,and%20sexual%20violence%20by%2018%25.




.
Don Lemon behind all this?
I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
February 21st, 2023 at 4:27:27 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4242
February 21st, 2023 at 7:24:57 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: DoubleGold
Wouldn't that be something?

------------------------------------------------------

SCOTUS to Reconsider Hearing Case Accusing Biden, Harris, Pence, and Other Lawmakers of Violating Oaths by Ignoring 2020 Fraud Allegations

Feb 16, 2023

The Supreme Court is reconsidering whether to hear a lawsuit filed by Raland J. Brunson that alleges President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

Brunson initially filed his lawsuit in the Utah 2nd District Court on June 21, 2021, with the goal of proving that, by voting against the proposed investigation into 2020 voter fraud, the defendants violated their sworn oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

After making its way to the Supreme Court, SCOTUS denied Brunson’s petition. On January 23, Brunson filed a petition for reconsideration.

In the petition, Brunson, who is representing himself in the case, argued that the involved lawmakers should face a penalty for violating their oaths of office or else they aren’t binding.

“The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election,” wrote Brunson, arguing that a “Presidential rigged election is a threat to the Constitution.”

“[W]hen members of Congress become aware of such allegations an investigation into these allegations is required or they become violators of their Oath of Office,” Brunson added.
.
.
.
https://100percentfedup.com/scotus-to-reconsider-hearing-case-accusing-biden-harris-pence-and-other-lawmakers-violated-oaths-by-ignoring-2020-fraud-allegations/

------------------------------------------------------------


TOLD YA

“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 21st, 2023 at 8:04:43 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4242
Raland is on the left.

A brother (Loy on the right) has one coming.

https://ralandbrunson.com/Packets.jpg
February 21st, 2023 at 8:26:22 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4242
The most interesting one I noticed was when Muammar Gaddafi was assassinated.

----------------------------------

Coup d'état
.
.
.
According to Clayton Thyne and Jonathan Powell's coup data set, there were 457 coup attempts from 1950 to 2010, of which 227 (49.7%) were successful and 230 (50.3%) were unsuccessful. They find that coups have "been most common in Africa and the Americas (36.5% and 31.9%, respectively). Asia and the Middle East have experienced 13.1% and 15.8% of total global coups, respectively. Europe has experienced by far the fewest coup attempts: 2.6%." Most coup attempts occurred in the mid-1960s, but there were also large numbers of coup attempts in the mid-1970s and the early 1990s. From 1950 to 2010, a majority of coups failed in the Middle East and Latin America. They had a somewhat higher chance of success in Africa and Asia. Numbers of successful coups have decreased over time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

-----------------------------------

The 2014 coup in Ukraine

https://www.wsws.org/en/topics/event/2014-coup-ukraine
February 21st, 2023 at 8:52:22 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: DoubleGold
Raland is on the left.

A brother (Loy on the right) has one coming.

https://ralandbrunson.com/Packets.jpg


Does it ever get disheartening to believe all these absolutely stupid things that never come to fruition?
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 21st, 2023 at 8:58:41 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4242
Quote: ams288
Does it ever get disheartening to believe all these absolutely stupid things that never come to fruition?


I wouldn't call it stupid (not all related to intelligence).

Knowing right and wrong comes from the conscience and then processed through the mind.

So one person with a clogged conscience might not agree with another with a clear conscience, all other things being equal.
February 21st, 2023 at 9:33:05 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: DoubleGold
I wouldn't call it stupid (not all related to intelligence).

Knowing right and wrong comes from the conscience and then processed through the mind.

So one person with a clogged conscience might not agree with another with a clear conscience, all other things being equal.



Most of this board’s active posters have blocked you because of your fringe views and nonsensical posts, does that weigh on your conscience?
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 21st, 2023 at 9:40:45 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4242
Quote: ams288
Most of this board’s active posters have blocked you because of your fringe views and nonsensical posts, does that weigh on your conscience?


A conscience is not negatively affected unless a person is wrong.

Disagreement doesn't prove a person is being wrong.

But implying someone as being stupid when they aren't stupid is likely wrong.

That could affect a person's conscience negatively.
February 21st, 2023 at 10:23:31 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: DoubleGold
A conscience is not negatively affected unless a person is wrong.

Disagreement doesn't prove a person is being wrong.

But implying someone as being stupid when they aren't stupid is likely wrong.

That could affect a person's conscience negatively.


You were certainly wrong to post about that frivolous case that had zero chance of ever being heard by SCOTUS.

But you won’t admit that…
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman