Spoiler Dicussion of The Force Awakens

December 29th, 2015 at 1:45:14 PM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: Pacomartin
I remember that scene.


Me, too. I placed it immediately. My problem was with the number of SW movies. Why should there be more than four?? :)

Quote:
I remember what Jean Luc says to Number One afterwards, also.


Words to the effect that "for a moment I could see three lights." (or however many the interrogator wanted him to see).

The odd thing is I saw the episode when it aired, and then never again.

The same thing happens with Orwell's "1984." It's one of a handful of good books I never re-read, yet I recall an awful lot about it (I did see the movie).

I've been meaning to get it and re-read only the portions of "Goldstein's book."
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
December 29th, 2015 at 2:18:47 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
A perfect example that if you wear
a costume, you have to over-act
to out-act the costume. Especially
if you have a plastic butt crack
glued to your face.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 30th, 2015 at 10:59:33 AM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Nareed
The same thing happens with Orwell's "1984." It's one of a handful of good books I never re-read, yet I recall an awful lot about it (I did see the movie).


It was a very pivotal scene in the book. I will always remember it. Particularly the line, "We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?"

Star Trek always took pains to borrow from great literature in the past, particularly Shakespeare. Star Wars never did that AFAIK.

Quote: 1984

'There is a Party slogan dealing with the control of the past,' he said. 'Repeat it, if you please.'

'"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past,"' repeated Winston obediently.

'"Who controls the present controls the past,"' said O'Brien, nodding his head with slow approval. 'Is it your opinion, Winston, that the past has real existence?'

Again the feeling of helplessness descended upon Winston. His eyes flitted towards the dial. He not only did not know whether 'yes' or 'no' was the answer that would save him from pain; he did not even know which answer he believed to be the true one.

O'Brien smiled faintly. 'You are no metaphysician, Winston,' he said. 'Until this moment you had never considered what is meant by existence. I will put it more precisely. Does the past exist concretely, in space? Is there somewhere or other a place, a world of solid objects, where the past is still happening?'

'No.'

'Then where does the past exist, if at all?'

'In records. It is written down.'

'In records. And --?'

'In the mind. In human memories.'

'In memory. Very well, then. We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?'

'But how can you stop people remembering things?' cried Winston again momentarily forgetting the dial. 'It is involuntary. It is outside oneself. How can you control memory? You have not controlled mine!'

O'Brien's manner grew stern again. He laid his hand on the dial.

'On the contrary,' he said, 'you have not controlled it. That is what has brought you here. You are here because you have failed in humility, in self-discipline. You would not make the act of submission which is the price of sanity. You preferred to be a lunatic, a minority of one. Only the disciplined mind can see reality, Winston. You believe that reality is something objective, external, existing in its own right. You also believe that the nature of reality is self-evident. When you delude yourself into thinking that you see something, you assume that everyone else sees the same thing as you. But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the Party holds to be the truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party. That is the fact that you have got to relearn, Winston. It needs an act of self-destruction, an effort of the will. You must humble yourself before you can become sane.'

He paused for a few moments, as though to allow what he had been saying to sink in.

'Do you remember,' he went on, 'writing in your diary, "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four"?'

'Yes,' said Winston.

O'Brien held up his left hand, its back towards Winston, with the thumb hidden and the four fingers extended.

'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?'

'Four.'

'And if the party says that it is not four but five -- then how many?'

'Four.'

The word ended in a gasp of pain. The needle of the dial had shot up to fifty-five. The sweat had sprung out all over Winston's body. The air tore into his lungs and issued again in deep groans which even by clenching his teeth he could not stop. O'Brien watched him, the four fingers still extended. He drew back the lever. This time the pain was only slightly eased.

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Four.'

The needle went up to sixty.

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Four! Four! What else can I say? Four!'

The needle must have risen again, but he did not look at it. The heavy, stern face and the four fingers filled his vision. The fingers stood up before his eyes like pillars, enormous, blurry, and seeming to vibrate, but unmistakably four.

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Four! Stop it, stop it! How can you go on? Four! Four!'

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Five! Five! Five!'

'No, Winston, that is no use. You are lying. You still think there are four. How many fingers, please?'

'Four! five! Four! Anything you like. Only stop it, stop the pain!'

Abruptly he was sitting up with O'Brien's arm round his shoulders. He had perhaps lost consciousness for a few seconds. The bonds that had held his body down were loosened. He felt very cold, he was shaking uncontrollably, his teeth were chattering, the tears were rolling down his cheeks. For a moment he clung to O'Brien like a baby, curiously comforted by the heavy arm round his shoulders. He had the feeling that O'Brien was his protector, that the pain was something that came from outside, from some other source, and that it was O'Brien who would save him from it.

'You are a slow learner, Winston,' said O'Brien gently.

'How can I help it?' he blubbered. 'How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four.'

'Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.'

He laid Winston down on the bed. The grip of his limbs tightened again, but the pain had ebbed away and the trembling had stopped, leaving him merely weak and cold. O'Brien motioned with his head to the man in the white coat, who had stood immobile throughout the proceedings. The man in the white coat bent down and looked closely into Winston's eyes, felt his pulse, laid an ear against his chest, tapped here and there, then he nodded to O'Brien.

'Again,' said O'Brien.

The pain flowed into Winston's body. The needle must be at seventy, seventy-five. He had shut his eyes this time. He knew that the fingers were still there, and still four. All that mattered was somehow to stay alive until the spasm was over. He had ceased to notice whether he was crying out or not. The pain lessened again. He opened his eyes. O'Brien had drawn back the lever.

'How many fingers, Winston?'

'Four. I suppose there are four. I would see five if I could. I am trying to see five.'

'Which do you wish: to persuade me that you see five, or really to see them?'

'Really to see them.'

'Again,' said O'Brien.

Perhaps the needle was eighty -- ninety. Winston could not intermittently remember why the pain was happening. Behind his screwed-up eyelids a forest of fingers seemed to be moving in a sort of dance, weaving in and out, disappearing behind one another and reappearing again. He was trying to count them, he could not remember why. He knew only that it was impossible to count them, and that this was somehow due to the mysterious identity between five and four. The pain died down again. When he opened his eyes it was to find that he was still seeing the same thing. Innumerable fingers, like moving trees, were still streaming past in either direction, crossing and recrossing. He shut his eyes again.

'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?'

'I don't know. I don't know. You will kill me if you do that again. Four, five, six -- in all honesty I don't know.'

'Better,' said O'Brien.

A needle slid into Winston's arm. Almost in the same instant a blissful, healing warmth spread all through his body. The pain was already half-forgotten. He opened his eyes and looked up gratefully at O'Brien. At sight of the heavy, lined face, so ugly and so intelligent, his heart seemed to turn over. If he could have moved he would have stretched out a hand and laid it on O'Brien arm. He had never loved him so deeply as at this moment, and not merely because he had stopped the pain. The old feeling, that it bottom it did not matter whether O'Brien was a friend or an enemy, had come back. O'Brien was a person who could be talked to. Perhaps one did not want to be loved so much as to be understood. O'Brien had tortured him to the edge of lunacy, and in a little while, it was certain, he would send him to his death. It made no difference. In some sense that went deeper than friendship, they were intimates: somewhere or other, although the actual words might never be spoken, there was a place where they could meet and talk. O'Brien was looking down at him with an expression which suggested that the same thought might be in his own mind. When he spoke it was in an easy, conversational tone.
December 30th, 2015 at 11:16:39 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: Pacomartin
Star Trek always took pains to borrow from great literature in the past, particularly Shakespeare. Star Wars never did that AFAIK.


"1984" is the best concise manual on how to run a totalitarian dictatorship. The story is fiction, but the methods are all too real. If Stalin's USSR fell short of Oceania, it was mostly due to lack of technology and manpower, not the will to implement full control.

What's scary is how much like religion the Party's basic philosophy is. I've drawn parallels before.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
December 30th, 2015 at 12:27:20 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: Pacomartin
"We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?"


This was always the attitude of the Church.
Even today they are still trying to rewrite
and change their awful history, but they
no longer control anything.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
January 1st, 2016 at 11:16:03 AM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Star Wars nearly beat the box office total of Jurassic World in two weeks. It missed by -0.047% or $305K. It is almost certain to pass Avatar and Titanic in the USA and Canada box office, to be the largest grossing domestic film ever by the end of the third week (without adjusting for inflation).

It hasn't released in China yet, but there is almost no doubt that it will pass Jurassic World on a worldwide basis. The jury is still out on Avatar and Titanic. The film may not resonate as loudly in Asia.

Worldwide Box Office in millions
1 Avatar Fox $2,788
2 Titanic Par. $2,187
3 Jurassic World Uni. $1,669

Star Wars $1,331 after two weeks
January 1st, 2016 at 8:26:43 PM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 23, 2012
Threads: 239
Posts: 6095
Quote: Pacomartin
Worldwide Box Office in millions
1 Avatar Fox $2,788
2 Titanic Par. $2,187
3 Jurassic World Uni. $1,669


I was going to remark that I didn't think any of those movies were that great. Avatar I outright didn't like, Titanic was entertaining in a primitive kind of way, but wouldn't make my top 100, and Jurrassic World was somewhere between those two.

So, I got to wondering how far I would have to go down the list to find a movie I really liked.

All Time Box Office

The answer, I had to go down to #85, with The Sixth Sense, to find a movie that I would enthusiastically recommend. It doesn't seem to belong on that list of what looks more like the most expensive movies ever made.
Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber
January 1st, 2016 at 10:55:33 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Wizard
The answer, I had to go down to #85, with The Sixth Sense, to find a movie that I would enthusiastically recommend. It doesn't seem to belong on that list of what looks more like the most expensive movies ever made.

The Sixth Sense was a lower budget film that was a shocking hit, and supposedly made Bruce Willis over a $100 million.

But a big revenue film around the world has to be somewhat simplistic since many people do not speak English.

But certainly no film in the top 10 of money earners has won the Oscar for Best Picture since 2003
2014 #78 Birdman FoxS
2013 #62 12 Years a Slave FoxS
2012 #22 Argo WB
2011 #71 The Artist Wein.
2010 #18 The King's Speech Wein.
2009 #116 The Hurt Locker Sum.
2008 #16 Slumdog Millionaire FoxS
2007 #36 No Country for Old Men Mira.
2006 #15 The Departed WB
2005 #49 Crash Lions
2004 #24 Million Dollar Baby WB
2003 #1 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King NL
2002 #10 Chicago Mira.
2001 #11 A Beautiful Mind Uni.
January 2nd, 2016 at 12:23:18 AM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25011
Quote: Wizard
I was going to remark that I didn't think any of those movies were that great. Avatar I outright didn't like, Titanic was entertaining in a primitive kind of way,


I hated both those movies. I was rooting
for the weirdo CGI characters to be destroyed.
Titanic was just a stupid movie, I liked the one
from 1953 with Clifton Webb much better.
I like scary dinosaurs so I'll probably like
Jurassaic World. I root for the dinosaurs,
of course. They're such simple creatures,
eat and crap, and make crude oil for us to
use 400 million years later.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
January 2nd, 2016 at 6:28:48 AM permalink
Wizard
Administrator
Member since: Oct 23, 2012
Threads: 239
Posts: 6095
I might see the final Hunger Games movie today -- another huge money-maker. I'm not expecting to like it but two of my kids have been asking to go.
Knowledge is Good -- Emil Faber