Simple question?
Thread Rating:
January 20th, 2016 at 6:40:26 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Why not? It's all the flimsiest of speculation. There doesn't have to be one, no matter how much you protest against it. And if there is one, it's not necessarily the entity you say it is. But will you set different rules for different entities?
None. There cannot be such a thing as an all-powerful entity. Too many contradictions. For example, if the one true god Demeter were all powerful, she could create a duplicate of herself who would also be all powerful. So now we have two all powerful gods and consequently twice as much power as existed before. Only the amount of power remains the same: infinite. This means that X times two equals 2X but when you measure 2X it equals X.
Did the one true god Minerva?
That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard (and I've heard Trump speak). What do religious Jewish and Christian Egyptologists do? With nearly every Egyptian's name they'd be saying things like "Living image of Amun," "Mantu is pleased," "The soul and image of Ra," "Her life belongs to the Aten." The horror!! When you use my forum name, you're not saying "May it always be so" (though of course the Anglicized spelling may be to blame; if you saw it in the traditional Anterian transliteration of Na'arid" you might have understood it). Nor when you use my real name are you saying "Pure" or "Purity." Nor when you meet someone named "Chris" do you assume, "oh, how devout!" Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
January 20th, 2016 at 11:01:45 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Did you miss the hint or did you not realize it was a hint? I thought completely missing it would be V I R T U A L L Y impossible. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
January 20th, 2016 at 8:11:23 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
There does fairly obviously have to be only one truly all-powerful entity.
This is the old, "Can God make a square circle or make a stone so heavy He cannot lift it?" To this the theologian Berkoff says, "There is no absolute power in God that is divorced from God's perfections." God is all-powerful and all-wise and all-good at the same time. He also cannot lie, cheat, or steal but this does not make God not all-powerful. You also seem to not grasp (and who of us does) the concept of infinite. Putting aside the logical and moral impossibilities of God creating a duplicate of Himself you still cannot have a being more powerful than the one that created the duplicate. You would have one non-contingent infinite all powerful being and another created all-powerful being that is not infinite. God's power is not diminished or increased by His creations because it is already infinite.
Minerva, no. But the God who is being itself does have to exist, He cannot not exist. Even if there is no universe or space or time God still necessarily exist because unlike everything else He is the source of all creation and being, He is eternal and infinite. It might be helpful if you break out of the conception of God that equates Him to finite things like Minerva or FSM.
That could be the meanest thing you have ever said to me.
You very well could be the "living image of Amun" or the "The soul and image of Ra" but you or nothing other than God could be, "I am who is" or "I am being itself".
This might be what your name or other names mean but by saying it you are not implicitly and explicitly stating that this person is that or that I am that. By pronouncing the sacred name of God, YHWH, you have to be saying that you are the essence of all being. You are not. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 20th, 2016 at 8:53:17 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
I don't get this either. You make up a name and call it sacred and then make saying the name magical. It's the height of pagan superstition, thinking that words alone have power. Without superstition and magical thinking there would be nothing to the Catholic church at all. To use one of FrG's favorite words, it's really quite amazing. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 21st, 2016 at 6:41:07 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Do you not comprehend the contradictions inherent in infinity? Say the one true god Demeter is all powerful, and the one true god Minerva is all powerful, and the one true god Vash is all powerful. They each have 1/3 of all the power available, but they each have infinite power, because 1/3 of infinity is infinity. If one of them were to have Her powers cut in half, they'd still be infinite and equal to that of the others. You can have an infinity of all powerful beings, each having the same and all the power as the others always.
If such beings existed, that would be so. but then the one true god Venus would create six hundred septillion all powerful gods and still retain all her power while she shares it with her creations, who all have all the power as well. There is no limit to infinity.
And yet he managed. Good job!
I thought you were relaying information, not presenting such a preposterous suggestion as your own.
So if Jehovah said the name "Ankhasunamun," he'd cease being the high-almighty god and demote himself to a subservient role to the one true god Amun? Kind of like Mr Myxsplk (or whatever) can be banished by spelling his name backwards?
That's the most... I think I've said it before. A name is what you call a person. It's not an ontological statement. However, a noun is what a thing is and what the thing is called. Say the word "chair" is what we call a thing where people sit down, and what the thing itself is. If we follow these two premises we find that Jehovah is not a person, but a thing. Still, when I say the word "table" I'm not claiming I'm a table. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
January 21st, 2016 at 7:28:24 AM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
I think you are saying that the concept as used by some Christian groups where they ask you "Are you saved?" and if you answer "I don't know" that means "no" in their opinion. If you answer "yes" then the state is permanent, regardless of your actions. That concept does not exist in the bible in a straightforward manner AFAIK. However, the Online Etymology Dictionary says saved (adj.) meaning "delivered from damnation," c. 1300. The word is certainly used in the bible (both old and new testament), but I think you are correct that it is not the centerpiece of a detailed theological discussion. But it is used such as: He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. While the meaning of the word "saved" has undoubtedly been expanded in recent centuries, it's basic concept did exist in the bible. It is different than words like rapture which was not popularly known until the 1830's. In Christian eschatology therapture refers to the belief that either before, or simultaneously with, the Second Coming of Jesus Christ to earth, believers who have died will be raised and believers who are still alive and remain shall be caught up together with them (the resurrected dead believers) in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. As Father Gamble pointed out, "the rapture" as defined above is thought by Roman Catholics to be a Protestant delusion.
|
January 21st, 2016 at 8:07:11 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | You know I think if the Cardinals of this forum held an election for the Pope of DT I would cast my ballot for Paco. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 21st, 2016 at 8:18:54 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Yes, but only if you have an irrational infinity or an infinity divorced from reason and morality. There is no contradictions in an all-powerful, all-loving, all-knowing, all-good being we call God.
What you seem to be missing is twofold. First Dementer is the creator of all these other gods. Second, if Dementer is all-powerful why create these other all-powerful gods. It seems that Dementer is not all-knowing.
Yes this is a logical contradiction and is again a good reason why there can only be one infinite being.
You seem to be conflating infinite power with infinite wisdom, goodness, etc. Just because someone can do something doesn't mean the would or should do it. Reason and morality govern our powers, a lesson we all should learn from God before we blow ourselves up or worse.
Aha, you are close to getting it I think. The name of God is not just what you call Him, "Hi, my name is Steve." It is also an ontological statement. You also hit the nail on the head by recognizing that in speaking of God we are not talking about a person, like Minerva or Ra or Dementer, but a spiritual being that is beyond our comprehension who is being itself, who is truly (and not just in name), "I AM". Still, when I say the word "table" I'm not claiming I'm a table. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 21st, 2016 at 8:54:42 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
This is the key to the whole thing. You first make up a god, then to avoid having to explain anything about him, you just claim he is 'beyond our comprehension'. The rabble nod approvingly and let you off the hook. It's just all so darned mysterious. lol If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 21st, 2016 at 10:14:33 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
LOL, there is A LOT we can know about God but we can never hope to know or understand everything. He is always greater. In fact if you think you have completely understood God than you can be sure that is not God. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |