Simple question?

Thread Rating:

January 16th, 2016 at 10:24:59 AM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Nareed
Whereas name-calling is the sine-qua-non of the mature, fair rhetorician.

Good to know.


Good point, sorry about that. Exaggeration can also ruffle feathers especially when called ignorant.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
January 17th, 2016 at 6:34:15 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: FrGamble
Exaggeration can also ruffle feathers especially when called ignorant.


Do you not know the difference between "ignorant" and "argument from ignorance"?

If you don't, then it makes little sense to ask what evidence you have that the law of conservation of energy needs an exception as big as ten times the universe multiplied by the square of its volume taken to the ninth power times a googolplex (I exaggerate; it may be only the eighth power).
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
January 18th, 2016 at 6:42:10 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: FrGamble
Just ask yourself can energy come from nothing? Can energy spontaneously exist without any source?


The law of conservation of energy states energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. This would mean energy is eternal.

Disprove it.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
January 18th, 2016 at 6:57:05 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Nareed
The law of conservation of energy states energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. This would mean energy is eternal.

Disprove it.


First of all I take back everything I said during my little dust-up about your exaggeration comment. You were right and if I thought about it a little more I would have seen that you were not being ignorant but pointing out that you think my argument is fallacious because of ignorance.

Anyway, in my mind it is fairly easy to show that energy is not eternal. Does energy contain within itself its reason for being? The reason the answer is no is because we can easily imagine that there is no energy. Energy is not necessary, it does not have to exist. This goes beyond natural laws into the higher realm of metaphysics and basic logic. For any non necessary or contingent being/matter/energy to exist it must be created by something that is necessary and non-contingent. That has its being in itself, that is being itself.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
January 18th, 2016 at 7:10:55 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25013
Quote: FrGamble


Anyway, in my mind it is fairly easy to show that energy is not eternal. .


Glad you said it's only in your mind,
because science doesn't agree with
your theory that meshes so nicely
with your belief in a mythical creator
god.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
January 18th, 2016 at 7:22:13 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Science doesn't have anything to say about the creation of matter or a creator God.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
January 18th, 2016 at 7:28:25 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25013
Quote: FrGamble
Science doesn't have anything to say about the creation of matter or a creator God.


Why should it, science doesn't have
a lot to say about unicorns either.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
January 18th, 2016 at 7:37:16 PM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: FrGamble
Does energy contain within itself its reason for being?


Sure, why not?

Quote:
The reason the answer is no is because we can easily imagine that there is no energy.


Bad news: I can easily imagine there's no you.

Quote:
Energy is not necessary, it does not have to exist.


Are you aware whatever isn't space is some form of energy? Without energy you'd only have space. But without energy to drive the expansion of space, it would be infinitesimally small and completely empty.

No. It's not necessary. unless you want to, you know, exist.

Quote:
This goes beyond natural laws into the higher realm of metaphysics and basic logic. For any non necessary or contingent being/matter/energy to exist it must be created by something that is necessary and non-contingent. That has its being in itself, that is being itself.


Energy is non-contingent, since it is eternal.

Prove it's not.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
January 19th, 2016 at 6:13:58 AM permalink
pew
Member since: Jan 8, 2013
Threads: 4
Posts: 1232
Quote: Nareed
Sure, why not?



Bad news: I can easily imagine there's no you.



Are you aware whatever isn't space is some form of energy? Without energy you'd only have space. But without energy to drive the expansion of space, it would be infinitesimally small and completely empty.

No. It's not necessary. unless you want to, you know, exist.



Energy is non-contingent, since it is eternal.

Prove it's not.
I think the laws of thermodynamics proves that energy is not eternal because if it was then the temperature of the universe would be near absolute zero and it's not.
January 19th, 2016 at 6:45:41 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: pew
I think the laws of thermodynamics proves that energy is not eternal because if it was then the temperature of the universe would be near absolute zero and it's not.


The average temperature of the universe is a frosty 2.73 K.

Absolute zero is 0 K.

Oh, some people will cite 5.05 K or so. That's almost twice as warm, but both are near 0 K.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER