ESPN's future

Page 12 of 12« First<9101112
September 6th, 2017 at 5:18:21 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 105
Posts: 7510
Quote: Pacomartin
But even Google Fiber, which is pretty much state of the art cable is fairly expensive for television.

Google Fiber is $50 for 100 MBPS and $70 for 1000 MBPS (GIGABIT), a phone line is a $10 option.
Television is $90 for 220 channel + as high as $70 for optional premium channels (includes HBO, CINEMAX, SHOWTIME and STARZ).

The same company, Google, offers Youtube Live TV for $35 for 48 channels including ESPN (No Turner channels like CNN, TBS, and TNT).


Charging what the market will bear?

The TV charge is just paying what the networks seem to be charging. What these networks are not seeing is that I get as much entertainment from YouTube as I ever will from ESPN. As more narrowcasting takes off, more and more people will prefer to watch their niche than some ESPN commentator giving the approved, PC take on things.
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
October 30th, 2017 at 7:17:12 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 105
Posts: 7510
MSESPN Canít Afford Monday Night Football Any More

This guy really sees the end of ESPN coming, claiming that ESPN will not be able to renew MNF or most of its other contracts, and may even sell the later years off to the tech companies. Also saying that Disney will upstream every last dollar they can in a sort of legit bust-out, leaving a dead network behind.

The finance guys might want to look at that idea vs letting it wind down. I doubt busting it out is the best way to go, unless subscriber loss is projected to increase in rate. If they sold it to say AMZN fast, they might even be able to make a deal to do the production of the games, which would for sure have a learning curve.

If they decide to go the bust-out route, they need to sell it all off fast. Otherwise they end up selling off the best assets to keep the worst assets. This always happens, from DuMont to Eastern Airlines, companies in trouble sell off the good to keep the bad. It never works.
The man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it
October 31st, 2017 at 4:56:27 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 774
Posts: 9178
Quote: AZDuffman
... sell the later years off to the tech companies.


Will the tech companies pay $1.9 billion a year for MNF? That is for 18 games just for the rights. They still have to produce it.

Only five years ago: NOV 9, 2012 Why ESPN Is Worth $40 Billion As The World's Most Valuable Media Property
October 31st, 2017 at 5:30:05 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 111
Posts: 12797
They're reporting that ESPN is losing 15,000
subscribers per day. That's $300,000 in real
money, out the window every 24 hours. How
long can this go on. 600 people an hour are
cutting the cord on ESPN.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
October 31st, 2017 at 5:51:15 PM permalink
DRich
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 18
Posts: 846
Quote: Pacomartin
Will the tech companies pay $1.9 billion a year for MNF? That is for 18 games just for the rights. They still have to produce it.

Only five years ago: NOV 9, 2012 Why ESPN Is Worth $40 Billion As The World's Most Valuable Media Property


I thought there was only 17 Monday night games. Two the first week and one each of the following 15 weeks unless they count one of the Thanksgiving games as MNF even though it is on a Thursday.
October 31st, 2017 at 10:55:08 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 774
Posts: 9178
Quote: DRich
I thought there was only 17 Monday night games. Two the first week and one each of the following 15 weeks unless they count one of the Thanksgiving games as MNF even though it is on a Thursday.


I think ESPN gets one wild card game in addition to the 17 MNF games
Page 12 of 12« First<9101112