What Movies Have You Seen Lately?
December 15th, 2014 at 12:51:19 PM permalink | |
Ayecarumba Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 89 Posts: 1744 |
But did Tom Cruise's character actually do the crime because he was told he was going to do the crime? I don't think so. Please give this film another look. I don't know if the plot hole was that big. The fact that folks were being tried and convicted prior to the crime actually occuring was the whole point of the movie, so I suppose viewers having a problem with it is a good thing from the writer's point of view. |
December 16th, 2014 at 7:39:50 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Hell, yes. He gets the notice from the McGuffins floating in the tubs (another sore point left unaddressed), and that sets him on a path to find out who this guy is he's supposed to kill. Absent the "precognition," there would have been no point to the movie. Tom Cruise would have kept working at his job like usual.
It was bigger than the diameter of the Solar System.
Yes and yes. But the movie completely ignores this tiny, little detail. Now, granted ethical issues are not exactly easy to deal with in an action movie, then why make it an action movie? ;) More seriously, there are all these grand ideas in SF wasted on movies like Minority Report (action), Species (terror), Prometheus (more terror), Artificial Intelligence (maudlin sentimentality and retelling a bad story; what if the movie had focused on Monica after she abandons her son?) Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 16th, 2014 at 12:17:36 PM permalink | |
jml24 Member since: Dec 6, 2012 Threads: 0 Posts: 26 |
The problem with SF movies is that the grand ideas appeal to thinking people, but the big profits are made from movies that focus on mindless entertainment. The less plot, the better, because then it is easy to sell the movie worldwide. Thinking movies can work with a small budget since they don't need to get a huge audience to break even. Unfortunately, science fiction usually comes with an expectation that we will see wonders of the future, which means a big budget. To help pay back the big budget the producers feel the need to dumb down the product. One SF movie of the last few years that I found to be fairly effective was "Moon." Not a real deep thinking one but not just mindless entertainment either. |
December 16th, 2014 at 1:43:36 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Babylon 5 managed with a modest budget by extensive use of CGI. granted that was on TV, and granted the effects look dated now, but it can be done. Speaking of which, that's why I prefer TV for science fiction over the movies. With so many episodes per season, there are bound to be some very good ones. This includes "thinking" episodes which can hash out ethical problems. Even Star Trek did this. Actually trek did it pretty well. I forget the title of the ep where Data undergoes a legal hearing to determine whether he's sentient. Great episode. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 16th, 2014 at 3:33:32 PM permalink | |
Ayecarumba Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 89 Posts: 1744 |
My response The twist in the resolution was that Tom Cruise's character actually did not commit the murder, but it was set up to make it appear so... So.... not so big a plot hole after all. |
December 16th, 2014 at 4:13:08 PM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 | Domestic - Worldwide (if different) *Minority Report [2002] $132.1m - $358.4m ($102 million production budget *Dark City [1998] $14.4m - $27.2m *Miller's Crossing [1990] $5.1m *Gattaca [1997] $12.5m *Strange Days [1995] $7.96m ($42 million production budget) I think partly you have to judge a movie by what it was trying to do. Minority Report was a big budget action movie. Like a lot of Tom Cruise movies the plot is incoherent and is secondary to the action. Strange Days was a little bit of a stretch. James Cameron and Kathryn Bigelow (who were together then) could afford to take some wild chances with a movie. It suffered from being difficult to follow, and was essentially a failure. But I think it deserves kudos for taking chances. The other three were all excellent small budget films. Very clear in their objectives and very emotionally moving. |
December 16th, 2014 at 4:20:41 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
I did notice that. But the point remains without the advance notice that he would kill someone, Tom Cruise would have spent the rest of the movie waiting to prevent another murder. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
December 24th, 2014 at 9:30:40 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18770 | Sold for scrap at 1 penny. The Ranger was in movies and television shows, including "The Six Million Dollar Man," "Flight of the Intruder" and "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" where it stood in for the USS Enterprise carrier. The Ranger’s most famous role was in the 1980’s Tom Cruise "Top Gun" You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
December 24th, 2014 at 10:14:09 PM permalink | |
Ayecarumba Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 89 Posts: 1744 |
There was a movie some time ago about an aircraft carrier that goes through a time warp and has a chance to stop the attack on Pearl Harbor... I can't recall the name of the film, but was the Ranger in that 80's movie too? |
December 24th, 2014 at 11:12:09 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18770 | Here http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080736/ Not sure if the same ship. Not much of a ship expert. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |