Climate Change -- conspiracy theory or is it time we all drive a Prius?

August 31st, 2023 at 5:37:31 AM permalink
Tanko
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 0
Posts: 1995
Vivek Ramaswamey Nukes Andrea Mitchell On Climate Change
August 31st, 2023 at 5:42:23 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18255
Quote: Tanko
Vivek Ramaswamey Nukes Andrea Mitchell On Climate Change


WOW. She did not know what hit her. She is the perfect example of the believers not thinking for themselves.
The President is a fink.
August 31st, 2023 at 6:05:39 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 30
Posts: 2509
Sounds familiar.

Overall, it's very good a young Patriot can see through the scam.

--------------------

‘I Mean This With Due Respect’: Vivek Ramaswamy Calls Out MSNBC Host For Linking Climate Change To Major Hurricane

August 29, 2023
.
.
.
“The right answer to all temperature-related deaths is more plentiful, abundant access to fossil fuels,” Ramaswamy continued. “The earth is covered by more green surface area today than it was a half a century or a century ago because carbon dioxide is plant food and carbon dioxide as a percentage of the atmosphere, is still at a relative low.”
.
.
.
https://dailycaller.com/2023/08/29/vivek-msnbc-climate-change-hurricane/

---------------------
August 31st, 2023 at 7:26:09 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18813
Quote: Tanko
Vivek Ramaswamey Nukes Andrea Mitchell On Climate Change


Ramaswamy has been given multiple chances to clarify that human caused warming is the actual hoax, but he won't because he's not a simple-minded thinker. He considers the hoax to be the approach to solving it. Maybe he will eventually say that right out, but he hasn't yet.


And I already caught on how this is going to be applied as I already addressed in an earlier post after watching the debate.


Quote: rxwine
Ramaswamy is suggesting a pivot, that's more or less mitigation. He is suggesting better air conditioning and heating will save people and other things along that line. I'll be interested to see if more Republicans start embracing this. It is perhaps a devious way to not explain why some will pivot from human caused global warming is not a problem or not real; to we've got a better way -- just forget we weren't on board that it was a problem to now we're acting like we have to do something. Drill drill drill is going to be a great answer to suddenly changing their position and hope no one notices.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
August 31st, 2023 at 8:13:27 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18813
Also there seems to be a misplaced assertion that elimination of fossil fuels is the only allowable goal. Maybe some are waving that assertion. But carbon neutral is not equivalent to eliminating fossil fuels.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
August 31st, 2023 at 8:24:54 AM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Reality getting in the way for California.

"He’s also blessed extensions of gas and nuclear power plants that were scheduled to be closed. Keeping the lights on takes precedence over California’s clean energy goals, at least for now.

Newsom is grappling with the same nuts-and-bolts challenges of running the electric grid as other blue-state officials in New York as well as the Biden administration. The pivot reflects the awkward reality faced by Newsom and other climate-minded governors: Politics moves far faster than the building of solar fields, wind farms and transmission lines, while power blackouts and electric bill spikes hit home immediately."
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
August 31st, 2023 at 9:44:08 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 30
Posts: 2509
Carbon dioxide is greening Earth, a biological woman will always be a woman, and Trump won by a landslide.

The elite want us to think the opposite.
September 10th, 2023 at 8:14:12 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Trust the real scientists.

"Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific," states the declaration signed by the 1,609 scientists, including Nobel laureates John F. Clauser from the US and Ivar Giaever from Norway/US.

"Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They... ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial... There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent." — 1,609 scientists, There is no Climate Emergency, clintel.org."
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
September 10th, 2023 at 8:50:57 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 189
Posts: 18813
Quote:
A document published in late June is currently making the rounds on social media: the document is signed by 1,107 scientists and expert members of the Climate Intelligence Foundation (Clintel), based in the Netherlands, who insist that “there is no climate emergency”. To make their case, they state that “warming is far slower than predicted”, that “climate policy relies on inadequate models”, that CO2 is “plant food”, and that global warming “has not increased natural disasters” (p. 3), among other false or misleading claims which have been thoroughly debunked by climate experts on numerous occasions.

For example, with regard to the reliability of models on which climate predictions are based, after consulting the available scientific literature, we conclude that the models have been very precise in their global warming predictions. Here we show that certain extreme phenomena, such as heat waves, have intensified in half a century.

What’s more, most of scientists who appear in the document have not been formally educated in the field of climate or meteorology. Rather, according to the document by Clintel, there are numerous engineers, biologists, chemists or physicists – signatories also include a commercial fisherman, a cardiologist, an air conditioning engineer and numerous retired geologists. There is also a Nobel laureate in Physics, Ivar Giaever, who received the award in the 1970s for his contributions to knowledge on the superconductivity of materials, which is unrelated to climate studies.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
September 11th, 2023 at 2:38:01 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18255
Quote: kenarman
Trust the real scientists.

"Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific," states the declaration signed by the 1,609 scientists, including Nobel laureates John F. Clauser from the US and Ivar Giaever from Norway/US.

"Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They... ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial... There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent." — 1,609 scientists, There is no Climate Emergency, clintel.org."


But the believers keep saying 98% of the scientists agree??
The President is a fink.